Jump to content

Pros vs Cons - The Range AFM


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for all the info. Is the hypertech system good?

It's a tune, so your drivetrain warranty will be in jeopardy

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

wow the crappy Range is still tripping warning messages. I couldn't stand that on my 2014, had to take to dealer to clear the message. I went full tune and never looked back. I wouldn't waste any money on the Range product.

 

Hypertech is good, tried one at first, but now I'm using Diablosport I2 and feel more of a difference vs. Hypertech.

Posted

wow the crappy Range is still tripping warning messages. I couldn't stand that on my 2014, had to take to dealer to clear the message. I went full tune and never looked back. I wouldn't waste any money on the Range product.

 

Hypertech is good, tried one at first, but now I'm using Diablosport I2 and feel more of a difference vs. Hypertech.

Yah, from what I understand, there really isn't s tuner yet for the '17.... Think I saw a couple threads on here somewhere.

 

Plus you're taking chances with your warranty if something does happen from your tune. I know they have to prove it, but not all shops are friendly.. :)

 

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks for all the info. Is the hypertech system good?

 

Hypertech Max Energy installed on '15. I've tried both the 92 octane tune and the regular fuel tune, 92 octane fuel may have been a tad quicker at WOT in the upper rpms, wasn't worth having to run premium fuel (JMHO). I think any tuner is going to accomplish a very limited seat of the pants feel in a 6000# truck. What I do like are the trans shift points and firmness adjustments as well as recalibrate tire diameter as well as ability to turn off AFM. My '15 has the 87 octane tune, stock shift points, +25% firmness, AFM disabled and tire size adjusted for 32" (275/65/18).

Posted

Well, it looks like I am now a Range AFM beta tester for the 2017 version. I'll let you know how it goes.

 

2017 Silverado 1500 Z71 4x4 Regular Cab Short Bed

Posted

Beta version is a no go. Took a few drives and the message is back.

Posted

Beta version is a no go. Took a few drives and the message is back.

That sucks....

 

Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Posted

That sucks....

 

Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

I'm gonna keep testing it and report back to them. Hopefully that can help them fix it.
Posted

As far as I understand there's a lot of misinformation in this thread.

If you use a tuner such as diablo sport or EFI Live (black bear peformance), both claim there is no evidence that flash count or other way to identify any tampering/tuning if you flash stock files before bringing back to a dealer.

Posted

Yah, from what I understand, there really isn't s tuner yet for the '17.... Think I saw a couple threads on here somewhere.

Plus you're taking chances with your warranty if something does happen from your tune. I know they have to prove it, but not all shops are friendly.. :)

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

BBP does a great job tuning 2017's.

 

Your taking a very small risk with a typical tune.

Quite different if your going for a 700hp+ supercharged build or something:

If your not comfortable then don't do it.

Posted

As far as I understand there's a lot of misinformation in this thread.

If you use a tuner such as diablo sport or EFI Live (black bear peformance), both claim there is no evidence that flash count or other way to identify any tampering/tuning if you flash stock files before bringing back to a dealer.

From what I understand, the Range claims it isn't suppose to write/alter anything either, but my report when I brought mine in to clear the reduced steering assist warning, the dealer wrote down, multiple codes in modules. Didn't list what the codes were and what modules, but it would seem, the Range ended up throwing codes, but didn't turn my CEL on....

 

When that key word, "claim", by EFI/Diablo turns into "guarantee", then spending that amount for a tuner will hurt less.. :D and that was one thing I really wanted from the tuner, the ability to undo the tunes if needing to bring it in for service and not worry about tripping something they can see to screw you out of warranty coverage. Some shops can be a pain.

 

BBP does a great job tuning 2017's.

 

Your taking a very small risk with a typical tune.

Quite different if your going for a 700hp+ supercharged build or something:

If your not comfortable then don't do it.

That's the problem, there's always a small risk, depending on the dealer I guess. The dealer I go to seems ok for now. It's not the comfort level, it's, is turning off the AFM before warranty runs out worth it or not. It's not like every truck with AFM is biting the dirt.

 

I'd rather do a tune then use a bandaid AFM, but at the time I was looking, there were no tuner available for the 2017, just like Range didn't quite have a working firmware.

 

I've been using M5 around town and then letting V4 kick in on freeway/interstate runs, which is not that often.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk

Posted

As far as I understand there's a lot of misinformation in this thread.

If you use a tuner such as diablo sport or EFI Live (black bear peformance), both claim there is no evidence that flash count or other way to identify any tampering/tuning if you flash stock files before bringing back to a dealer.

Their lying

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Their lying

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There is a huge thread debating it that spans many pages.

But having read it all as far as I am aware there has not been a single instance that someone was actually denied warranty coverage due to a tune being detected if following procedure.

Feel free to send an email to bbp if you have any questions, very knowledgeable and helpful people.

Like I said though if not comfortable don't do it. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...