Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I enjoyed it and didn’t mind paying for it but this truck just doesn’t receive it well at all. It’s all I listened to in the Avy


I don’t think it’s the truck, I think it’s the service cause I’ve noticed it past couple months too and called to complain. They said they were having updates which should soon fix the problem. I noticed mine going in and out sporadically.


Sent from above
Posted
12 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


I don’t think it’s the truck, I think it’s the service cause I’ve noticed it past couple months too and called to complain. They said they were having updates which should soon fix the problem. I noticed mine going in and out sporadically.


Sent from above

 

We will agree to disagree on this. My Accord in the garage is crystal clear, my truck sitting outside will barely (well if at all) pick up the demo channel. During my 3 month trial, I couldn’t even listen to 1 song in its entirety. Now I live in the same place I have for years and my 2008 Avalanche would never lose a signal unless I was in the Mobile tunnel or the airport covered parking garage. My neighbor has a 2010 Escalade and his place is surrounded by trees (I hate his leaves in my yard lol) and he has perfect reception. So I’m basing my opinion on my truck and what others have said. I think it’s the same antenna that the WiFi goes through too. While I’m in the truck I can’t get a WiFi signal from my phone hotspot but it will see the house WiFi. Maybe I’ll see what the dealer says about it on next visit?? Glad yours works and you’re right $140 for two cars isn’t bad IMHO ?

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have a 2014 Sierra. When I bought the truck it had Sirius xm installed and worked fine. I let the subscription expire. Last week I renewed it, and reception is crap. When I start the truck it takes 10-30 min for it to receive the signal. Once it does receive it, it drops out a lot, even with nothing blocking it. I’m thinking of checking the software to see if it needs updating. Any thoughts out there? Thank you!

Posted

Sounds like a signal issue... like your antenna can't/isn't providing signal to your radio.  Just had the antenna and radio replaced in my 17 recently.  Manufacturers are building crap these days.

Posted
On 2/4/2019 at 2:22 PM, SS502 said:

I feel sorry for SiriusXM...I know a lot of us just said screw it, never went past my 3 month trial with the crappy reception.

So quick update. I took it back in today and they replace my tuner. Guess what? Works better than any other SiriusXM radio I've had. I haven't been able to get it to cut out.

 

I would still argue that the factory antenna is weak because my after-market antenna shouldn't have fixed the problem if the tuner was the ONLY issue but regardless I'm happy. So, if you are having this issue as them to replace the tuner first and then the antenna.

  • 9 months later...
Posted
On 2/26/2019 at 3:39 PM, Kent Dillin said:

So quick update. I took it back in today and they replace my tuner. Guess what? Works better than any other SiriusXM radio I've had. I haven't been able to get it to cut out.

 

I would still argue that the factory antenna is weak because my after-market antenna shouldn't have fixed the problem if the tuner was the ONLY issue but regardless I'm happy. So, if you are having this issue as them to replace the tuner first and then the antenna.

What do you mean by “tuner”? The receiver? New receiver? Can I do as I’m past my warranty

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I have a 2017 GMC Terrain.  I recently started having problems with my SeriusXM going off and displaying a No XM Signal.

After numerous resets with Sirius Support, then sent me to the GMC Dealer.  After pulling the dashboard out of my car they determined that my car needs a new radio and/or antenna.  They informed me that my vehicle with 49,000 miles was out of warranty, and it would cost $1200 to replace the radio.  Naturally they went to the most expensive resolution first.  After arguing with them for a half hour, they called GM then came back with a $400. price.

They told me that the wires on the back of the radio were broken, and the one going to the XM module in the radio has intermittent connection to the physical radio.

This all sounds absurd to me.  How do wires wear out on the back of a radio.

I just opened a complaint issue with GM who promised to have a Sr. Agent call me back in 2 days.

 

I see that others have similar issues. 

 

Let me know if any of you have a resolution.

Thanks

 

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I had a 2010 silverado. The truck did not have the capability of replaying the last hour of broadcast (i love being able to jump past the chattering disc jockeys, my radio is for music) so i took my after market tuner out of my old truck and installed it. I had great sirius for 10 years. Now i bought a 2020 and i was delighted that i could replay the last hour or so of broadcast.  WHAT GARBAGE!! I live at the same place and drive the same places. 80 percent of the time i can not get anything to replay and 20 percent of the time i dont get reception!!!!  I am going do it again, move my old tuner into my brand new truck that already has sirius!!!

  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...