Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I did this on my old truck, 6L80E. would never do it again i will just pay the dealer, no matter how long you let it drain, once you take the pan off its still all gonna drip in your face, all over the floor. cleaning took longer than the filter change. I have also heard way to many horror stories about the trans flush machine. id say get the filter changed and the 6-7 quarts done more frequently than a flush. i plan on changing my filter at 30k and then every 30k after that. gotta take care of the trans in these trucks, unfortunetly they seem like the weak link

Posted

Just a quick update. I went ahead and got the flush done today. The transmission seems MUCH happier. Shifts seem more snappy and it just feels overall better. If something changes ill update this thread. Thanks to all who replied.

Posted

I was told on my 2006 the flush is all they do at the dealership unless the truck has been used for heavy duty towing then they do the filter also.

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

The math of the trans fluid change:

Your 6L80E holds, for sake of argument, 12 quarts. I want to fully replace all the fluid in the transmission. I have three options.

 

1.)  Remove the gearbox, disassemble as much as need to fully drain the box/converter and replace with fresh fluid. 12 quarts.

 

2.)  Do a service fill which is remove the pan, change the filter and refill. This takes 6 quarts but leaves 50% of the original fluid. If I repeat this process four times with mixing (drive time) between dump and fills it takes four six quart changes to displace 93.75%% of all the original fluid. 24 quarts.

 

3.) Power flush. While this sounds like a good idea to get to the same 6.25% contamination level of method 2 I would need to flush 192 quarts or 48 gallons or roughly a drum of fluid through the system and that is if I could assure good agitation during the process. An 18 quart power flush leaves 65% of the old fluid in the box.

 

The number of service fills below will give these percentages of fresh to foul fluid. Run the truck a day or so between services and the filter needs to be changed but once. In fact if you have a pump you can do this at home via the dip stick. 

 

1 = 50% / 50%

2 = 75% / 25%

3 = 87.5% / 12.5%

4 = 93.75% / 6.25%

5 = 96.88% / 3.12%

6 = 98.44% / 1.56%

7 = 99.22 % / 0.78%

8 = 99.61% / 0.39%

9 = 99.81% / 0.19

10 = 99.91% / 0.09%

Posted

I'm not sure how you're figuring this out mister but that seems overly complex.  I've seen fellas drop two lines, one in each buck, and fire the motor.  One fills up with old fluid, the other sucks up the 12 quarts and when the former bucket starts getting red fluid instead of brown, shut the motor off, re-connect the lines and top it off proper and you're done.

 

Any fluid remaining in the valve body would be inconsequential and not hurting anything as it will surely be dissolved into the new when the appropriate function dislodges it.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, swathdiver said:

I'm not sure how you're figuring this out mister but that seems overly complex.  I've seen fellas drop two lines, one in each buck, and fire the motor.  One fills up with old fluid, the other sucks up the 12 quarts and when the former bucket starts getting red fluid instead of brown, shut the motor off, re-connect the lines and top it off proper and you're done.

 

Any fluid remaining in the valve body would be inconsequential and not hurting anything as it will surely be dissolved into the new when the appropriate function dislodges it.

 

 

integration is the short answer. Longer answer....

 

Try this. Put a eight ounce glass of milk in a sink. Above it one of those 5 gallon water bottles with a valve and start draining the bottle into the glass allowing the glass to over flow. Keep track of how much water it takes to make the glass clear again. When you done with that think how convoluted the interior of a transmission compared to the simple shape of a cylinder. In the laboratory you would use an 'opacity' meter to quantify the degree of cleanliness and not your eye which will lie to you. 

 

Next fill that glass with milk and dump it out. Fill it with water and dump it out. Over 90%. Repeat two more times and it will be 97% clear. This would simulate an overhaul fill. They taught you this in chemistry labs. 

 

Repeat that process with only removing 1/2 of the liquid each time. You'll get the point the math is supplied in the post. They taught you this in middle school math. 

 

The type of process the power or pump flush is trying to simulate is something similar to what the oil industry does to pipelines when flushing large transmission lines between liquid types. But most either don't know or don't remember they do this with a device called a 'pig' or a plug that fully displaces the lines volume in one sweep. Why? Refer the running water in a milk glass paragraph. A 24" pipeline is a much simpler shape than a gear box. 

 

Power flushing a brake system is a bit different due to line size and capillary action. Assuming you suck out the reservoir and refill three times before attaching the power head. Biology would have hinted at this. 

 

What your observing is an illusion of clean without actually being clean. That said accepting it is a whole different thing. It's your gear box. Do as you please. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Well then it looks like you know more than I on this subject.  My memory has long since forgotten such schoolin' as you mention, if I ever was schooled that way to begin with.  

 

As for me and my truck, maybe next time I'll drop the pan and do it old school, if physically unable to again, it goes back to the dealer and to the Trans Flow machine.

Posted
4 hours ago, swathdiver said:

Well then it looks like you know more than I on this subject.  My memory has long since forgotten such schoolin' as you mention, if I ever was schooled that way to begin with.  

 

As for me and my truck, maybe next time I'll drop the pan and do it old school, if physically unable to again, it goes back to the dealer and to the Trans Flow machine.

Dad has this pump he worked up to draw it from the dipstick tube. A metered 6 quarts. He's 89 and likely in better shape than I am. What most I know I learned from him. The milk trick is just fun to do. Try it. :seeya:

  • Like 2
  • 2 years later...
Posted

For those of us that just bought a used Silverado, I have a 2014 5.3L LTZ. I want to share the dealership costs with everyone. I had the transmission fluid and filter service done. I was charged $350.05. $132.12 in parts and $217.93 in labor. I was going to do it myself but I decided to be lazy and pay, I just dont have the time these days.  I have no issues on my transmission at all, just bought the truck with 68k miles and now its at 75k. Never know if the other owner treated it like I do. I live in Montana. 

Posted

Well, i dropped my pan and changed the filter at 40,000 miles...cleaned the magnet. To my surprise the thing actually seems to be shifting a little smoother now (probably my imagination). I'll just do simple drain and fills from here on out, once a year or so.

 

Magnet was fairly "clean", filter looked "good". If you ever change your filter, do yourself a favor...leave the little filter gasket in the transmission and don't try to replace it...it's a royal pain to get the old one out.   

  • 3 months later...
Posted

New to the forum.  I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 SLT 4WD 5.3L Gas engine with the 6 speed auto.  Just recently had the transmission fluid exchange (flush) done at my dealership, with ~ 51,000 miles on it.  So far I noticed much smoother shifts and quiter all around.  You can see the total cost was $252.50 (I live in CaliPOORnia and do not have the means to do a fluid change myself).  When I asked what this entails he said it completely exchanges out the old transmission fluid replacing it with new fluid, including what is in the torque converter.  He then said at ~100,000 miles they can do a fluid change, including the transmission filter.  However, I noticed one of the line items in the details is '1 6600 ATF Kit'.  When searching this nothing definitive comes up, but seems it could be a cleaning agent they use.  Thoughts?  Anyhow, as mentioned earlier so far so good using the flush.  From what I gather doing the flush with relatively low miles, like on my truck, is okay, just don't want to do it with higher mileage, since can push dirt and debris that have accumalated over time into places where it shouldn't be.  It's my opinion doing regular fluid changes will be beneficial in the long run, despite the manual saying can go to 150,000 for non-severe duty, which I think they say so people think they will save $$ by waiting that long, but seems that would be asking for trouble, and better to do more frequently.

fullsizeoutput_69b.jpeg

Posted
36 minutes ago, Outdoor 74 said:

New to the forum.  I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 SLT 4WD 5.3L Gas engine with the 6 speed auto.  Just recently had the transmission fluid exchange (flush) done at my dealership, with ~ 51,000 miles on it.  So far I noticed much smoother shifts and quiter all around.  You can see the total cost was $252.50 (I live in CaliPOORnia and do not have the means to do a fluid change myself).  When I asked what this entails he said it completely exchanges out the old transmission fluid replacing it with new fluid, including what is in the torque converter.  He then said at ~100,000 miles they can do a fluid change, including the transmission filter.  However, I noticed one of the line items in the details is '1 6600 ATF Kit'.  When searching this nothing definitive comes up, but seems it could be a cleaning agent they use.  Thoughts?  Anyhow, as mentioned earlier so far so good using the flush.  From what I gather doing the flush with relatively low miles, like on my truck, is okay, just don't want to do it with higher mileage, since can push dirt and debris that have accumalated over time into places where it shouldn't be.  It's my opinion doing regular fluid changes will be beneficial in the long run, despite the manual saying can go to 150,000 for non-severe duty, which I think they say so people think they will save $$ by waiting that long, but seems that would be asking for trouble, and better to do more frequently.

fullsizeoutput_69b.jpeg

Here in N.C. I had the transmission on our 2016 Suburban's fluid exchanged.  No pan drop, just fluid exchange.  I provided the AMSOIL fluid and they did the work.  Cost me $100. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

Here in N.C. I had the transmission on our 2016 Suburban's fluid exchanged.  No pan drop, just fluid exchange.  I provided the AMSOIL fluid and they did the work.  Cost me $100. 

That's a great price, wish I could get that deal where I live.  Have any issues arisen since the exchange?  I've only put about 100 miles since I had mine done but so far so good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...