Jump to content

Load Causes F150 Aluminum Bed to Break


joejoe11

Recommended Posts

Posted

He Split his pants for sure.   But I’m in agreement with those that say that force would likely have caused a problem in a steel bed.   

Posted

The bed is beer can thin aluminum, not that the beer can thin steel is much better in gm's product but it just shows that the f-150 cant take any abuse.

Posted
1 hour ago, BIGDOGx said:

The bed is beer can thin aluminum, not that the beer can thin steel is much better in gm's product but it just shows that the f-150 cant take any abuse.

The key word here is ABUSE. That which is not within the scope of the products design. 

 

Posted

Ive seen some steel beds Abused and mangled ...never one peeled apart like a bud lite can at a campsite bonfire. I expect the Box on a Truck should be made with the lowest common denominator owner in mind. Steel bends and contorts but doesent tear so easily. Good luck with that aluminum fellas.

Posted

Really now, you guys don't buy into Ford's hype on military grade aluminum?  There's a reason that the Ford ad on raising the bar and white knuckles ad about towing doesn't mention hauling, they won't stand up to it. If towing is all Fords are good for any more, they should give up their pick-up line and just sell Expeditions and Explorers, of course there are the diehard Ford fans that could still haul potato chips around in the bed of their p/u, those Ford beds may hold up to a bag or two of Frito-Lay.

Posted

Yet another reason I won’t even consider a FERD .. I buy a truck so I can do truck stuff : with that said : secure your damn load regardless..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

If the Ford can't withstand the abuse that caused this and be classified sub par, junk then can I conclude that a Chevy whose steel body dents in a hailstorm is also junk?

 

No one is going to convince me that this Fords bed damage was the result of 'normal' use anymore than hail damage could be considered normal.

 

Hate from unknown context...really???? 

Posted
5 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

If the Ford can't withstand the abuse that caused this and be classified sub par, junk then can I conclude that a Chevy whose steel body dents in a hailstorm is also junk?

 

No one is going to convince me that this Fords bed damage was the result of 'normal' use anymore than hail damage could be considered normal.

 

Hate from unknown context...really???? 

Really tough to say without knowing all that was factored in but, I gotta think that a steel bed would have held up better... Aluminum tears much easier than steel... W/ that said all these dang cars are sporting such thin sheet metal these days in the name of a few better MPG... It sucks... We will not know if the use was abuse without know what what being hauled and how the 'incident' happened.. Details withstanding: steel will take more abuse than aluminum  in terms of a truck bed application, would that extra strength have been enough to prevent the bed from blowing apart?? We will never know!

Posted

So what we learned here is if you're going to be a moron and drive with a heavy unsecured load, don't buy a Ford? 

 

 

Posted

I suppose this was inevitable with the incentives to make trucks lighter and lighter to meet economy standards. I wonder if the plastic beds we're seeing out now on some of the other brands would be more durable, or less? I do believe the Toyota Tacoma bed is made of plastic now, right? 

Also, isn't the new 2019+ GM beds aluminum?

 

I'd be devastated if this happened to me. That was a pretty truck before it got hurt. I think trucks need more tie down hooks and things standard. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Ashleyfox118 said:

I suppose this was inevitable with the incentives to make trucks lighter and lighter to meet economy standards. I wonder if the plastic beds we're seeing out now on some of the other brands would be more durable, or less? I do believe the Toyota Tacoma bed is made of plastic now, right? 

Also, isn't the new 2019+ GM beds aluminum?

 

I'd be devastated if this happened to me. That was a pretty truck before it got hurt. I think trucks need more tie down hooks and things standard. 

The load was unsecured. Not sure more tie downs would help. As for the other trucks, GM is only using aluminum on "things that open"- hood, doors, tailgate. The Taco has had the composite bed since like 2005 and has proven to be plenty durable. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,661 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...