Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 14 Silverado ltz z71. I added front and side cameras. One of the issues IS the resolution of the screen. But, I overlook that at night. One thing I did was to add BRIGHT led reverse lights from Diode Dynamics. Not cheapo led's. I also have the Putco LED tailgate light bar which does running,  brake, turn, and reverse lights. That makes a huge difference with the camera. I need the cameras because of dark window tint. I agree with the people who complain about NOT having a quality in our trucks, especially our high trim/price models. But I also agree with others that its there, it may not be great, but its better than having nothing.  Some say that they dont trust their cameras and they just use mirrors. I dont get that one. Can you see the trailer hitch using your mirrors?? No, you cant.  There will always be some people who say that something is terrible and then on the same item, others say its great. I bet if you took those two and put them right next to each other, i bet they would most likely be the same. Thats just the way it is... WE JUST HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT.... Would you go buy a different brand truck ONLY because the backup camera is better? If so, ill see ya on the ford truck forums too. I dont let this stuff bother me. Complain sometimes, yes, make me get rid of my awesome trucks, NO.

Posted

You will definitely have to overlook the lack of contrast control at night because there is no alternative, there is no adjustment in settings. My main complaint is that you cannot control the contrast, and try to navigate using the back up camera  day or night when its raining.  Impossible to safely rely on the camera.

If Toyota can manage to install a much superior camera system than GM something is wrong in Detroit!! 

 

  • 6 months later...
Posted (edited)

62k for a GMC 2500 2018 Duramax and the camera has a picture like it came from the clearance rack at Walmart.  Does anyone make a good replacement camera?

Edited by Cta
Spelling
  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

I never noticed how bad the image quality was in my 16 Silverado until I rented a 19 Nissan Vogue. Now I keep going back and wiping off the lens thinking it's coated with crud but it doesn't help. C'mon GM, you can't do any better than this?? And what's up with the outside temp readout? Almost never right.

Posted

the camera has been better than any of our other cars, so it feels like a step up. now our infiniti QX60...what an absolute POS. I remember we used to think it was so great until we got the sierra. 

Posted

we never had back up cameras for 100 years, now everybody cant park without one.. lol  I fixed mine.. I took out the headrests from the back seats and leave my tail gate down , I now have to twist my body around and look behind me when backing up.. Like the old fukin days lol : )

problem solved

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Yep, my 2018 Sierra 3500HD backup camera is awful/ dangerous at night, and just acceptable during the day. Camera flares-out with any overhead lighting and my own license-plate light at night, making it virtually unusable. Literally can't see my trailer's hitch in my driveway (fortunately bumper sensors tell me). Screen is WAY TOO BRIGHT when shifting into reverse at night (NAV screen dims just fine with dash gauges, but NOT when it switches to camera display while in reverse); blinding. I rented a POS Hyundai Elantra last week for work, and the camera was SPECTACULAR at night, highlighting how awful GM's system is in my $80K truck. An information display should not display bad information; relying on this camera is a recipe for impaling otherwise obvious stuff while in reverse at night.

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

 

Where's my trailer's tongue / giant-red-lock??!  I can (and do) clean the camera every single trip, but it makes no difference. This system has no decent contrast and has terrible lighting dynamic range, like late '90s camera quality. GM continues to choose price over quality, exampled by what they've done to Cadillac... I think this is my last GM product.

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Took my 2018 Z71 LT to dealership and had them do a "radio fix" on camera I forget the name of the thing....it is better not as good as HD but, better.

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 267 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...