Jump to content

Fuel Economy for 2019'


Recommended Posts

Posted

They are in another thread already here, but:
 

https://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/en/chevrolet/home.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2018/jun/0628-silverado-pricing.html

 

Quote

 

The first engines to be produced will be the 5.3L V-8 equipped with an eight-speed automatic, and the 6.2L V-8 equipped with a 10-speed automatic. Both offer more than 5 percent improvement in city fuel economy, for an improvement of 1 mile per gallon based on EPA estimates.

 

Models equipped with the 5.3L V-8 and rear-wheel drive offer an EPA-estimated 17 miles per gallon city, 23 highway and 19 combined. Models equipped with four-wheel drive and the 6.2L V-8 offer an EPA-estimated 16 miles per gallon city, 20 highway and 17 combined.

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
3 hours ago, Gagliano7 said:

So the auto stop and multiple cylinder deactivition  and only 1 mpg gain. 

Apparently, and that is even with the 400 or so plus pounds of reduced weight as well.

Disappointing for all that expensive technology if you ask me.

Posted

Something must have changed in the EPA's fuel economy testing parameters. The 2018 F-150 lost 1 MPG on some models compared 2017's, even when very little changed. The 2019 Ram 1500's fuel economy is the same as the 2018 Ram 1500 despite losing 225 lbs and gaining a bunch of aerodynamic improvements like the super low-slung active air dam. From what I recall, the EPA frequently updates the parameters used to calculate fuel economy.

Posted
On 8/7/2018 at 7:50 AM, Gagliano7 said:

So the auto stop and multiple cylinder deactivition  and only 1 mpg gain. 

It doesn't sound like a lot but I believe a 1 mpg improvement, especially when added to other recent improvements, is significant.  The improvement in efficiency, power and longevity of pickup trucks has been astounding. 

Posted

The longevity part, you may have to wait awhile. The current redesign of the 5.3, 4.3 just happened in 2014. There’re coming out with another one this year. The 5.3 prior to cylinder deactivation would routinely go 300K miles. I doubt to many after 2014 have gone past 200K yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
14 hours ago, KARNUT said:

The longevity part, you may have to wait awhile. The current redesign of the 5.3, 4.3 just happened in 2014. There’re coming out with another one this year. The 5.3 prior to cylinder deactivation would routinely go 300K miles. I doubt to many after 2014 have gone past 200K yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

:thumbs:

Posted
On 7/27/2018 at 4:35 PM, Keazer said:

Does anyone know the fuel economy numbers for the 2019's? Specifically the 5.3L and 6.2L. Thanks!

I have a 2019 LT TrailBoss, I am averaging 16.5 around town and 20 on they highway. I only put about 200 miles on so far though. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The government testing is done in an enclosed space with no wind and air drag to overcome. The faster you drive the less likely you are to begin to approach the EPA numbers. Any way you look at it, with a pickup truck the engine is having to push a brick through the air and that takes horsepower and fuel.

 

For my part I use a 16 MPG diesel truck, a 22 MPG gas SUV, and a 45 MPG gas hybrid Prius sedan. We put about a third of our miles driven each year on each of these vehicles. Now if I used the 2500HD as my daily driver I would be buying a lot more fuel and spending at least twice as much on maintenance and repairs.

Posted

Also for 2019; they got rid of the 3.08 gears which likely lowered their MPG rating. 

 

I think a few things are at play here; no more MPG gearing (lowers mpg), likely EPA testing changes (lowers mpg), yet they improved mpg with weight loss, aerodynamics, new cylinder deactivation, and possibly start/stop.

 

I am not an engineer; but I have heard a vehicle at idle uses little fuel.  So, the S/S tech may be more of an emissions thing than aimed at improving mpg.

Posted
On 8/12/2018 at 10:28 PM, Cmillerjr said:

I have a 2019 LT TrailBoss, I am averaging 16.5 around town and 20 on they highway. I only put about 200 miles on so far though. 

I am doing better than this with my 2014.

You even have Stop Start and Dynamic Skip fire.

Its an awesome looking truck though sir!

Posted
6 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

I am doing better than this with my 2014.

You even have Stop Start and Dynamic Skip fire.

Its an awesome looking truck though sir!

Maybe it’s the way I drive, but my 2014 averaged 14.9 lifetime. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Cmillerjr said:

Maybe it’s the way I drive, but my 2014 averaged 14.9 lifetime. 

Amen to that.

When i run E85 and put my foot into it, my average is about 11.5! :loser:

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,835
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ballencd
    Newest Member
    ballencd
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 685 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m doing an experiment on a vehicle I don’t have much money in. I’m going by the premise that after they last 100K miles they were no mechanical problems with assembly. Or defects with the parts. With oil changes by the minder for the first 127K miles when I acquired it. I quickly went through low mileage oil changes then settled on 5k oil changes with close to 170K miles on the vehicle currently. I did have the option to turn off the cylinder deactivation. I didn’t on this vehicle because in ECONOMY mode at least half the time. It should be a no brainer frequent oil changes are the key. The manufacturer gets away with the long oil changes with its severe service  maintenance. Just ask them what is normal. 
    • Even set to "recirculated", the air pushes out and is hot. I have noticed that sometime it doesn't want to switch between recirculated/vented air. Say it is set to Circulated Air and I want to switch to Vented, when I click the Vented button, it just quickly lights up/clicks and immediatly switches back to Circulated. It's done this a few times now. So maybe it is an actuator getting stuck? But then, that doesn't explain the hot air when everything is off does it?
    • I wonder what the price is out at the coast, Big Sur or other out of the way locations as I bet they are charging quite a premium over the in land pumps. 
    • Were you looking at the HD trucks on the GM website or the half tons as that makes all the difference. As far as I know there are only two options for the HD trucks and that is the standard 2 speed transfer case or the 2 speed transfer case that has the added 4 high auto feature and they put that transfer case by default into the LTZ and High Country although its optional in the LT and not sure if its available in the work trucks.    The half tons, that is where its been a total mess in my estimation for a few years now with most trucks below the top trim having the single speed transfer case as standard but with the option of having the two speed such as one would get by choosing the Z71 package, however then not being able to get the two speed transfer case with the towing package unless it was a higher trim truck AND had the 6.2 gas so one could combine the towing package gearing diffs with the two speed transfer case. Having said that if its a trail boss package then it gets the two speed transfer case but not necessarily able to get the tow package as it would depend on trim level and engine chosen. Believe me, people have bought the GM half tons assuming "of course it will have a two speed transfer case" only to find out after when they really pay attention to what they now own .... crap, there is NO low range !.    I don't believe Ford or Ram have gone that way yet with their half tons but like I say its been a few years now that GM has done this with the half tons. 
    • $5.19 for regular...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...