Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I made an account just to post the fix for this, couldn't find it anywhere.... Your mileage may vary but this is what worked for me.

 

After having my alarm go off continuously with the hood ajar message I unplugged the hood latch sensor to fix the issue but in doing so I lost my factory remote start, not an big deal during the summer but now that its 20 degrees out its an issue. I dislike spending $100-$200 to replace a part that works fine because the $1 electrical switch integrated into it broke. The BCM seems to use logic on that pin other than high/low so the fix isn't as simple as twist the wires together. I ended up cutting the sensor/switch pigtail and wiring in a 10k ohm potentiometer and turning it till it worked. For my truck that was ~2100 ohms. The truck harness only utilizes two wires of the three pin connector and one of them is a ground. Solder in the 2100 ohm resistor in between the red and black wires as shown attached (don't forget to put the shrink tube on before) plug it in and the hood switch will be bypassed in the  "hood closed" position. keep in mind that you can now remote start with the hood open and peoples hands in there. Use at your own risk.

 

2015 GMC Sierra 1500 SLE 4x4 5.3L

Hood Bypass.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Hey im having the same exact problem on my 2015 chevy silverado 3500. I bought a new sensor and still have the same problem. So would your fix still work for mine?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Linden16 said:

Hey im having the same exact problem on my 2015 chevy silverado 3500. I bought a new sensor and still have the same problem. So would your fix still work for mine?

Its possible, but if its a new switch the problem could be elsewhere, like the BCM. I would put a multimeter on the new switch and see what it says for resistance in both positions.

Posted

Yeah i put a new sensor in hoping it would fix the problem but nope. And its weird. It only does it when the truck is cold. Once I start going after 2-4 minutes it just stops and doesn’t ring again.. its still annoying though when it rings

Posted
2 minutes ago, Linden16 said:

Yeah i put a new sensor in hoping it would fix the problem but nope. And its weird. It only does it when the truck is cold. Once I start going after 2-4 minutes it just stops and doesn’t ring again.. its still annoying though when it rings

is the switch on the 3500 not integrated into the hood latch? Did you replace the whole latch or just the switch?

Posted

732 ohms open, 2312 ohms closed is the spec. Give or take some in real life.

Posted
6 minutes ago, TenshiWingusu said:

is the switch on the 3500 not integrated into the hood latch? Did you replace the whole latch or just the switch?

Yeah its the whole late assembly correct. So i installed that and still have the same problem yup.. not sure what else could be causing it. And like i said it only rings when the trucks cold. After a few minutes of driving it stops

Posted
21 hours ago, TenshiWingusu said:

is the switch on the 3500 not integrated into the hood latch? Did you replace the whole latch or just the switch?

So how come you cant just hook the wires together without a resistor? What would happen if you did that

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Linden16 said:

So how come you cant just hook the wires together without a resistor? What would happen if you did that

The Control module is looking for a specific voltage/current for hood open and closed. Not just continuity. They use additional logic for fault diagnosis. That's how it knows the difference between being closed vs unplugged. Just twisting the wires together sends 12vdc to the module which likely won't damaged it but possibly could if it's made for less input.

Edited by TenshiWingusu
Posted
9 minutes ago, TenshiWingusu said:

The Control module is looking for a specific voltage/current for hood open and closed. Not just continuity. They use additional logic for fault diagnosis. That's how it knows the difference between being closed vs unplugged. Just twisting the wires together sends 12vdc to the module which likely won't damaged it but possibly could if it's made for less input.

Oh ok makese sense. I wonder if theres a way to silence alarms that would work. Cause i mean it only does it for like 3-4 minutes when the trucks cold then it stops. Its so weird idk what would cause that.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Linden16 said:

Oh ok makese sense. I wonder if theres a way to silence alarms that would work. Cause i mean it only does it for like 3-4 minutes when the trucks cold then it stops. Its so weird idk what would cause that.

You should be able to unplug it and have no issues other than no remote start.

Posted
8 minutes ago, TenshiWingusu said:

You should be able to unplug it and have no issues other than no remote start.

But yeah i want my remote start thats handy lol. Buy a $60000 truck and have no remote start cause of a stupid hood sensor. Ill have to call the dealership and see. But i know theyll just charge you a arm and a leg to fix it

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Linden16 said:

But yeah i want my remote start thats handy lol. Buy a $60000 truck and have no remote start cause of a stupid hood sensor. Ill have to call the dealership and see. But i know theyll just charge you a arm and a leg to fix it

I hear ya. I would check the resistance on the new switch in both positions, you can force the latch closed with a screwdriver then pop it with the interior hood release. If the switch is in the spec mentioned above it's either bad wires somewhere or the control module has issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...