Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/24/2019 at 9:36 PM, Shannon said:

I’m having the same issue on my 2019 Sierra SLT, which I bought specifically with the 6.2L engine to tow our camper that we can’t tow safely now. GMC is no help at all. The dealership is no help at all. Maybe it’s time for a lawsuit.

I've been in this fight with GM since December with no success. My advice is to rely on your camera manufacturer. Furrion, Haloview and Voyager (ASA Electronics) are all coming up with fixes. I imagine yours is one of those. As to a lawsuit, I say go for it and, if you do, please keep me updated annually on the status. Sorry for the sarcasm, but as a lawyer myself I can tell when a battle isn't worth fighting and this is one. 

 

BTW, I have not heard from ASA Electronics since their earlier post on this thread, at which time they also offered to send me their prototype to test. 

Posted
3 hours ago, bshort said:

You do not need a back-up camera to safely tow a camper.  People have been safely towing for decades without them.  

Really? That's the best you have to offer? Why even post?

 

1)  People have been towing for decades without weight distribution hitches, anti-lock brakes, traction control, all-wheel drive, blind-spot monitors, lane departure warning systems and even automatic transmissions. Does that mean we should not take advantage of current technology to be safer? 

 

2)  It's a rear camera, not a back-up camera. A back-up camera only comes on when the tow vehicle in in reverse. But that brings up its other use, which is to assist in backing up in to tight spaces. Yes, I know, people have been backing up safely for decades.

 

3)  Whether the $400-500 camera is a "need" or a "want", the point is that it was bought on the rational assumption it would work. That a $60,000-70,000 tow vehicle can't adequately power it is an absurdity.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, J-Stroke said:

I've been in this fight with GM since December with no success. My advice is to rely on your camera manufacturer. Furrion, Haloview and Voyager (ASA Electronics) are all coming up with fixes. I imagine yours is one of those. As to a lawsuit, I say go for it and, if you do, please keep me updated annually on the status. Sorry for the sarcasm, but as a lawyer myself I can tell when a battle isn't worth fighting and this is one. 

 

BTW, I have not heard from ASA Electronics since their earlier post on this thread, at which time they also offered to send me their prototype to test. 

I realize a lawsuit is not feasible. I’ve just been telling everyone and posting all over about the crappy service and products GMC has. I’m in the process of swapping to a Ford. No more GM products for us. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, J-Stroke said:

Really? That's the best you have to offer? Why even post?

 

 

 

 

My response was in regard to the "file a lawsuit" portion of the post.  Guess you could've just scrolled on by, but.....

Posted

I wired  battery 12 volt to a relay that switched from light circuit. Relay squeezed into the maker light hole just above the camera. Put on 2000 miles this summer without any issues. Total time spent was an hour. 

Posted

It is definitely a voltage problem. Just got a 2019 ltz and my wireless rear observation and side marker cameras all stopped working. After multiple tests and working past dusk I noticed the trailer running lights looked a bit dimmer than normal. Long story short the voltage going to the running lights is low. This camera is wired to the running lights. Has brought to illuminate the power light, but the camera needs a specific minimum voltage to work. You can verify by hooking up a truck that works and connect a voltmeter to measure the voltage. Then do the same with the 2019 Silverado. It will be lower. The issue now is getting Chevy to address it. The other solution is connecting the camera to the trailer battery instead of the running lights. 

Posted
On 8/26/2019 at 8:19 PM, J-Stroke said:

I've been in this fight with GM since December with no success. My advice is to rely on your camera manufacturer. Furrion, Haloview and Voyager (ASA Electronics) are all coming up with fixes. I imagine yours is one of those. As to a lawsuit, I say go for it and, if you do, please keep me updated annually on the status. Sorry for the sarcasm, but as a lawyer myself I can tell when a battle isn't worth fighting and this is one. 

 

BTW, I have not heard from ASA Electronics since their earlier post on this thread, at which time they also offered to send me their prototype to test. 

I was also offered the prototype, but haven't received anything to date. We're not towing again for several more weeks, but it would be nice to have the fix before we go, so we can test it prior to the end of the camping season. The good thing is that the factory mirrors on the 2019's are very good for towing.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Jack D said:

I was also offered the prototype, but haven't received anything to date. We're not towing again for several more weeks, but it would be nice to have the fix before we go, so we can test it prior to the end of the camping season. The good thing is that the factory mirrors on the 2019's are very good for towing.  

Which type of Camera do you have?  Furrion sent us a prototype and it worked great on a 6,000 mile trip! Solved the whole problem.

Posted
1 hour ago, Jack D said:

I was also offered the prototype, but haven't received anything to date. We're not towing again for several more weeks, but it would be nice to have the fix before we go, so we can test it prior to the end of the camping season. The good thing is that the factory mirrors on the 2019's are very good for towing.  

Which type of Camera do you have?  Furrion sent us a prototype and it worked great on a 6,000 mile trip! Solved the whole problem.

Posted
28 minutes ago, VDR928 said:

Which type of Camera do you have?  Furrion sent us a prototype and it worked great on a 6,000 mile trip! Solved the whole problem.

Jack and I both have the Voyager which is made by ASA Electronics. ASA was a bit behind Furrion in coming up with a fix. ASA has offered Jack and me the opportunity to test the prototype for free. We've accepted the offer but have not yet received our prototypes.

Posted

Same issue. Definitely a voltage problem. My trailer lights run dimmer plugged into the 2019 Silverado. I wired the trailer camera to the trailer battery and it works. This proves it is a power issue not an interference issue. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...