Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Controller23 said:

Mine has code XCK “All Terrain Tires”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Then you should have AT tires. Simple.

Posted

I would say the sooner you contact the dealer, the easier bit will be to swap them out. Once they have a couple hundred miles on them, they couldn't put them on a new truck.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted
I would say the sooner you contact the dealer, the easier bit will be to swap them out. Once they have a couple hundred miles on them, they couldn't put them on a new truck.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk



I’ve already put 2500 miles on it in the first month. I’m not sure how this will play out really


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

If you put on that many miles, drive the cheap highway tires all summer then get a good set of all terrain tires later this year. They will probably be better than the all terrain tires the truck should have come with. Bring it up to the dealer and see if they can give you a discount on new tires. Ultimately they will say you took delivery of the truck as is. Once you take delivery, your leverage goes way down as they have already moved on to selling the next truck on the lot.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted

There is an earlier thread here that, if memory serves, includes some information about Fortitude being considered an AT tire by Chev. I seem to remember some guys already getting into a pissing contest over this.

Posted (edited)

Search the K2 forums and there are a couple threads about this same thing. Bottom line is this: GM put sh*t tires on ALL the Z-71 trucks and they still put the words, "all terrain" tires on the window sticker. That's just the way it is, like the sky is blue and grass is green. No point wasting your time arguing with the dealer who has nothing to do with it. Some people have tried to raise a fuss to no avail. The time to argue was before purchase. Some dealers might offer you an upgraded tire for a couple hundred $.

 

Do yourself a favor, sell the OEM tires, buy what you want and move on with life. I believe Discount Tire will give you a trade-in. I sold mine on facebook marketplace for $200 after putting 30k miles on them.

Edited by aseibel
Posted
16 minutes ago, aseibel said:

Search the K2 forums and there are a couple threads about this same thing. Bottom line is this: GM put sh*t tires on ALL the Z-71 trucks and they still put the words, "all terrain" tires on the window sticker. That's just the way it is, like the sky is blue and grass is green. No point wasting your time arguing with the dealer who has nothing to do with it. Some people have tried to raise a fuss to no avail. The time to argue was before purchase. Some dealers might offer you an upgraded tire for a couple hundred $.

 

Do yourself a favor, sell the OEM tires, buy what you want and move on with life. I believe Discount Tire will give you a trade-in. I sold mine on facebook marketplace for $200 after putting 30k miles on them.

 

Indeed. I reviewed the thread I referred to. Z71 (at least in '17) come equipped with Fortitude (18") or SR-A (20"), neither of which is considered to be an AT tire by anyone. Except Chevrolet that is.

Posted
 
Indeed. I reviewed the thread I referred to. Z71 (at least in '17) come equipped with Fortitude (18") or SR-A (20"), neither of which is considered to be an AT tire by anyone. Except Chevrolet that is.

I guess if this is how it came from the factory, I’m not terribly concerned. I mainly felt there’s something up with clearly non AT tires being on my truck which should have came with AT


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
6 minutes ago, Controller23 said:


I guess if this is how it came from the factory, I’m not terribly concerned. I mainly felt there’s something up with clearly non AT tires being on my truck which should have came with AT


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

It's a semantics thing. Chevrolet says they qualify as AT so that's that. You aren't the first guy to feel raped.

  • Like 1
Posted
 
It's a semantics thing. Chevrolet says they qualify as AT so that's that. You aren't the first guy to feel raped.


I’ll probably run these until they wear out, then replace with some LT ATs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Its not even chevrolet's problem, its the mothership: General Motors. I don't know why they do this. There is not a single truck owner who would call Goodyear SRA's all terrain tires. The other brands do the same thing. 

 

But maybe they figure people will want to replace them no matter what they do, so they just negotiated a cheap deal with goodyear for bottom of the barrel tires and leave it up to us to get what we really want.

 

3 minutes ago, Controller23 said:

I’ll probably run these until they wear out, then replace with some LT ATs

 

To the OP: the OEM tires are basically chosen for highway performance and fuel mileage. If you are okay with that, then there's really no problem. But these tires are not intended for serious off-road, or inclement weather. So I recommend doing what I did, rack up some miles while the tread is good, then dump them in the fall before the snow comes. I got a buy 3 get 1 free deal on Cooper AT3's at Fleet Farm last fall so I pulled the trigger. after selling my old set, I paid about $500 for a brand new set of rubber. I couldn't be happier.

(I see you are from WI, so you'll know what Fleet Farm is. :D)

Posted
Its not even chevrolet's problem, its the mothership: General Motors. I don't know why they do this. There is not a single truck owner who would call Goodyear SRA's all terrain tires. The other brands do the same thing. 
 
But maybe they figure people will want to replace them no matter what they do, so they just negotiated a cheap deal with goodyear for bottom of the barrel tires and leave it up to us to get what we really want.
 
 
To the OP: the OEM tires are basically chosen for highway performance and fuel mileage. If you are okay with that, then there's really no problem. But these tires are not intended for serious off-road, or inclement weather. So I recommend doing what I did, rack up some miles while the tread is good, then dump them in the fall before the snow comes. I got a buy 3 get 1 free deal on Cooper AT3's at Fleet Farm last fall so I pulled the trigger. after selling my old set, I paid about $500 for a brand new set of rubber. I couldn't be happier.
(I see you are from WI, so you'll know what Fleet Farm is. [emoji3])


That’s a steal for those Coopers. How is the noise?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
7 minutes ago, Controller23 said:

That’s a steal for those Coopers. How is the noise?

 

No noise at all when the tread is good. I had the previous version of them on my old truck, with I think 50k miles on them miles at time of sale and still no road noise. I'm a huge fan of Cooper tires, great traction in snow and long tread life. 

Posted
No noise at all when the tread is good. I had the previous version of them on my old truck, with I think 50k miles on them miles at time of sale and still no road noise. I'm a huge fan of Cooper tires, great traction in snow and long tread life. 

I think I’ve eventually ended up with coopers on every car I’ve owned


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

The TB, AT4 , Z71 and X31 trucks that come on an All terrain 20 switched sometime recently from from Bridgestone RHS to Goodyear Trail Runner AT 275/60/20. Both AT but more highway focused.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...