Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Still not responsive to the request. 

 

And what authority do you have over me? 😒

 

 

 

 

Apologies for that term.Trying to answer your scatter shot posts is why my responses seem shotgunned by OnTheReel. The only authority is I got paid for 40+ years to analyze lubricants. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, customboss said:

We are talking Redline non api non acea licensed formulas with POE that used to be st least 30% or more  now a cut probably of 10% or less. The formulas to ran in Honda and others for years. 

 

Red Line HP carries no license from anyone. Never has. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, customboss said:

Another lab ? 

 

Results on the left are the CUMMINS and those on the right RL0W20 both after 5K Miles. 

 

Not showing you what you wanted is it? 😬

 

Are you thinking the VOA from your blending of CUMMINS you shared with me? You want that as well?

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted
5 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Results on the left are the CUMMINS and those on the right RL0W20 both after 5K Miles. 

 

Not showing you what you wanted is it? 😬

 

Are you thinking the VOA from your blending of CUMMINS you shared with me? You want that as well?

Give me a chance to open the big computer. Can’t do this public analysis on a phone! 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Results on the left are the CUMMINS and those on the right RL0W20 both after 5K Miles. 

 

Not showing you what you wanted is it? 😬

 

Are you thinking the VOA from your blending of CUMMINS you shared with me? You want that as well?

Post up the VOA if post 2014 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, customboss said:

Post up the VOA if post 2014 

 

This is what you gave me as a VOA from you research during development. 

 

image.png.c06bcf012ad4cc33900cbaaded9a2fea.png

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

This is what you gave me as a VOA from you research during development. 

 

image.png.c06bcf012ad4cc33900cbaaded9a2fea.png

Just in case people are monitoring this exchange that could be concerned about proprietary issues this is a sample of the formula produced by Cummins/Valvoline in 2018-19  procured in El Paso TX  Cummins in 2018 0r 2019. 

 

This is a HD diesel engine oil using CJ4 add pack designed to clean up to 90% of carbon deposits out of the ISX engine series. 

 

Now lets go back to Grumpy's test results with Redline. Note the wear and fuels dilujte of the HD oil in 10w30 worked better than Grumpys run of Redline 5w20?  

Posted
On 2/12/2025 at 9:55 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Just not to a party I care to go to. Any idea how many times I've heard that story? 

 

Directionally NOACK tells a story of how light the base oils are. At 11% we have allot of OCP polymer to make a 5W30 and more for a 5W40 and given the 'advertised' below SAE spec HTHS values it misses on many factors I've found to be quite important. You disagree? Fine, you use it. Let me know the actual measured wear results in say a half million miles of continuous use, not the one change at a time thing you like to do. 

 

I'll keep my track record proven "over added" 5W30 with a HTHS of a 10W40 over a low ash 5W30 with a D6616 of an SAE20 and an HTHS value of who knows what....

 

The double speak in their advertising is dizzying. I'm not interested. I see one advantage of RLI over QSUD. Polarity. I'll give it that. 

 

 

  

Just saw this comment, DIRECTIONALLY  is what engineers say when they don't really know yet.  Hypothesis vs theory vs science based fact. 

 

Not attacking you just making a note. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Is this what you are looking for? A RLHP 5W30 Post 2014 VOA?

 

image.thumb.png.81f4d8f14750b8add4b9b3b75793cc6e.png

No wanted to see a follow up to your cummins oil test in the 4.3 but this is helpful. TY 

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, customboss said:

Now lets go back to Grumpy's test results with Redline. Note the wear and fuels dilujte of the HD oil in 10w30 worked better than Grumpys run of Redline 5w20?  

 

Not what I see. BTW not 5W20 but 0W20

 

I see two wear test so close to identical as to be laughable. If anything it tips in the direction of more VISCOSITY.

 

 :crackup:

 

I see two test 80K miles apart ON TWO DIFFERNT FUELS. Was on E-85 for that second test FOR THE INTIRE RUN and have been ever since. 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, customboss said:

Just saw this comment, DIRECTIONALLY  is what engineers say when they don't really know yet.  Hypothesis vs theory vs science based fact. 

 

Not attacking you just making a note. 

 

Lord, not what that means and you know it. Means they ALL, TYPES, follow the same PATTERN. 

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 6.) Check the play in the back seat cushion.   I stuffed a towel in-between the seat back and the window/rear wall and that cured the rattle.  Of course, that's not a permanent fix but it clearly identified the problem in my truck.  Realistically, I'll probably just shove something behind there and leave it at that, but the better solution would be to remove the seat and figure out how to tighten up that connection.
    • And how the Panthers platform is holding up on used cars, long after we die potentially 😜
    • Bro, you still got that truck? I'm not seeing any m rust or flaking, which rusted metal flakes. Everyone thinks the wax "is rusty" but it absorbs its surrounding environment, creating a hard, natural shell that you can literally shoot with a bullet and won't flake off. It'll last 50 years like that as long as the barrier isn't compromised by getting in a wreck or meets a chemical that disolves wax. My 09's frame is even duller looking than that, and is holding up better than my rockers or 3rd set of painted shocks. 
    • No.   That would be an LT and higher trim.  Passive entry.  There would be a little button on the door handle and you can program it to proximity lock or unlock.     WT and Custom do not get this feature.  
    • Mediocre, how much did they lose on the poorly conceived EV strategy?   I wonder how much the stock price is being 'inflated' by all the buy-backs?   Cadillac literally looks like a brand without a rudder, no clear goals or product direction - performance or luxury? I guess performance because we can throw a small block in whatever we can and call it a day. Certainly not luxury when a Denali or High Country is reasonably cross shoppable. The Celestiq - no way - no vehicle can command quarter million prices when something wearing the same badge is on the buy here pay here lot across town.   Notice the 'base' Escalade doesn't even come with the 'leather-appointed' seating surfaces.   Hummer EV - fail Silverado EV - fail Sierra EV - fail Bolt/Volt EV (The most successful EV cancelled, restarted, cancelled, whatever its current status it)   Hybrids - none Sedans - none Medium duty - not anymore Minivan - none Coupe - none Convertible - none CUVs - 20+/-   6.2 Recall that landed squarely on the GMs highest seller - and specifically the fattest margin higher trims of the Yukon, Escalade, et. al. The most critical product line they fumbled big time. In the Escalade segment, are those buyers forgiving GM for a bad engine and patiently waiting for the fixes and dealing with the headaches? Nope, they dump them and go straight to the other premium brands.   In the ENTIRE GM portfolio how many aspirational vehicles are there? Corvette, Escalade (quickly being superseded by the obvious better value Denali)...   I posted somewhere else... what if Cadillac left the luxury game and became a performance brand similar to AMG or (gasp) Ferrari? Cut all the entry-level and base models from their line up and focus on the V-series or Blackwing or whatever they call it now. Of course, those would have the pre-requisite luxury and technology as standard equipment. This opens the floor for Buick to step in/up as the luxury brand (like they are in China), no 'performance pretenses' get rid of the 'entry-level' models with equally 'entry-level' power trains and become the Maybach to Cadillacs AMG. With those two brands effectively out of the way Chevrolet, the 'entry-level' brand has the floor to itself and GMC can take over as 'professional grade'.    Now each brand has a focus, no in-fighting, clear direction, and customer targets.   Just need to sneakily slide Corvette into the Cadillac brand and dump the vestigial script writing.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...