Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Jacob,

       what year is your truck and is it the 5.3?  I believe this lower oil pressure is on the 2014 to 2018 trucks. 

    My 2001 never goes below 30 psi. 

I agree 15 is nerving thou.

Posted

79Mercy, 

   Good to know that your truck does the same thing as mine. Another step closer to thinking it’s normal to go this low. Hope it’s a piece of mind for you as well.

Posted
5 hours ago, Paintor said:

In the old days, 12 volts was sent to alternator to kick on charging system when key turned on. Resulted in overcharging of batteries. PCM now cycles alternator on and off to keep from boiling the battery off.

 

0 weight oil in Cali in hot temps getting low oil pressure....no fear. 

 

You can get a 5.3 with 20k miles from a crashed truck on Ebay for $2k. Keep trusting GM and just drive it. Insufficient Oil Pressure= AFM lifter failures via the Melling Bulletin from last year. They make the collapsible lifters for 4 cylinder shut down.

 

https://www.melling.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Melling-tech-bulletin-on-GM-LS-Deactivation-Lifter-Issues-3.1.18-1.pdf

 

Read what Melling says oil pressure is supposed to be.

 

 

 

That bulletin is for Gen IV LS engines.  The oiling system and pump is different in the Gen V LT engines.

Posted
 DirtyAndy, it would be great if you got back to me on this.  Problem is you have to drive it for over 30 to 40 minutes to get the readings that low, as far as how mine is. 
 
Thank you guys for all these great replies. So you guys are actually getting as low as around 15 pounds PSI according to the lines on the gauge in the dash?
 The more people that chime in on these low oil pressure’s of about 15 PSi,  on this model year, I think, will make a lot of us feel better that it’s very likely normal .  I would’ve been OK  in the first place, if it was a little above 20 psi at the lowest reading .  All my other previous trucks, never went below around 30 psi stopped, at idle, in gear, after a long drive. 
 The more people that chime in, give us a better idea of how these new trucks really are or what to expect...
   


This is mine after a slightly spirited 30 minute drive and after idling for about 15-20 seconds in gear.

7de7b2ae722eb349f2cba893f6e45023.jpg
Posted

 Thank you for the update DirtyAndy. Yours looks to be about in the 21/22 psi range. That’s where I think mine should be, but mine may read around what you have if I drove for 30 minutes in  somewhat colder weather. Here in California today we have low 90s weather and in 30 to 40 minutes of driving it does go to 15/16 PSI. 

     Do you guys think that I should bring the truck in for this low of pressure? I would be much more OK  about it, if it was to rarely go below 20 psi 

Posted
17 hours ago, Lucchini said:

Jacob,

       what year is your truck and is it the 5.3?  I believe this lower oil pressure is on the 2014 to 2018 trucks. 

    My 2001 never goes below 30 psi. 

I agree 15 is nerving thou.

2017 5.3L

 

I don’t run 0w-20 oil either. No reason to run an oil that thin in the TX heat. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I ran 7quarts of royal purple 0w20 and dropped under 15psi. Last quart was a additive I got from a guy involved with the performance engine development. Said run it for a week then check oil and adda oil to cover what is missing.
I thought about a thicker oil. But he and others said don't do it. There are good reasons they spec that oil and that pump. Absolutely it voids warranty if they catch it. And they do send samples out for testing. The clearance, temps, and weight is picked based on engineering specs. Will heavier oil hurt your motor short term? Maybe not but maybe. I just don't see a reason other then seeing the needle looks better on dash.
I added a gauge that data logs and has adjustable levels for temp and pressure. So I will know. And as insaid I would worry more if I had afm/DOD

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

1Slow1500,  What year truck and size engine do you have?  If you had my truck (2018 Sierra SLT Z71 CC 5.3) brand new with only a couple hundred miles on it when you noticed it. and have oil pressure go to as low as 15 psi (according to the factory gauge in the dash) at stop lights after fully being heated up (30/40 minutes of driving) with OEM 0w20 oil, would you take it in to have it looked at? 

Posted

 Jacoby,   Thank you for that updated info on your first answer.  I’m sure if I put thicker oil it would bring the gauge to more of what I would like to see. I would say this because when the engine is cold and the idle just drops to 500/600 RPM, and the 0w20 oil is thicker. I get between 30 to 40 psi while idling in gear.  Of course when it heats up to full temperature that changes ....

Posted
1Slow1500,  What year truck and size engine do you have?  If you had my truck (2018 Sierra SLT Z71 CC 5.3) brand new with only a couple hundred miles on it when you noticed it. and have oil pressure go to as low as 15 psi (according to the factory gauge in the dash) at stop lights after fully being heated up (30/40 minutes of driving) with OEM 0w20 oil, would you take it in to have it looked at? 
Great question and the answer is involved. But answer in short is no. I would research as you are,keep a eye on it. And stay on good oil changes with the bill of each oil change saved in a fill. After the break in and oil change done i would then and only if it still worried me have it dropped off for service.
And when I did that know what you.want the written complaint to state and get your full printed code report and the copy of the service invoice. So if if has.to go back your perfectly prepared and if GM reviews it all they see the the most perfect service complaint and document.
Like the old saying always be the smartest man in the room or keep your mouth shut long enough to learn, then state you point.
Number one reason a gm service complaint is denied is the written service request
Number two is the customer

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

My 2015 5.3 at 80K miles 

Lowest I see on mine is 30 Hot. 

I do run a 5w30 but when I switched there wasnt much of a  difference  in pressure , 2psi. 

  Have a buddy with 2018 , 6.2  8spd 

 His drops between 15 and 20 when hot . 

Posted

     1Slow1500, Thank you for your suggestion.

Sounds like you feel it’s normal, but to have it at least documented would be a good idea.  That’s why I started this thread is to see if other people are getting the same pressure using the suggested 0w20 oil.  If enough people chimed in saying they get similar results (well under 20psi) under the same circumstances, I would not even take it in.  So when other people see this thread they will easily be able to tell if they’re concern with oil pressure  in these new trucks  is legit or not. 

            So far I think I may just take it in to get documented like you had suggested. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

FlipZ71, Maybe they changed something with the 2018 models for the oil pressure? Did your buddy do anything about it with the dealer on oil pressure that low on his 2018?

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Lucchini said:

 Jacoby,   Thank you for that updated info on your first answer.  I’m sure if I put thicker oil it would bring the gauge to more of what I would like to see. I would say this because when the engine is cold and the idle just drops to 500/600 RPM, and the 0w20 oil is thicker. I get between 30 to 40 psi while idling in gear.  Of course when it heats up to full temperature that changes ....

They only spec 0w-20 on these trucks to obtain their unachievable fuel mileage numbers. Plenty of other models that share this motor (block) that spec 5w-30. So there is no issue running a heavier oil despite what one other person said. There is a multi page thread on here somewhere about using a heavier oil for obvious reasons and the consensus is that it won’t cause any issues. With that said I probably wouldn’t run a 40-50 weight though. No issues running 30

10 hours ago, FlipZ71 said:

My 2015 5.3 at 80K miles 

Lowest I see on mine is 30 Hot. 

I do run a 5w30 but when I switched there wasnt much of a  difference  in pressure , 2psi. 

  Have a buddy with 2018 , 6.2  8spd 

 His drops between 15 and 20 when hot . 

Same with me when I made the switch. With 0w-20 I wasn’t getting low pressure, was still seeing around 30psi hot idle. I simply made the switch because I think 0w-20 is too thin of an oil for hot TX climate. 

Edited by Jacoby

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,564 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...