Jump to content

Reverse cam guide lines missing!

Controller23
 Share

Recommended Posts

Controller23 Enthusiast

Controller23

Posted
Posted

Had this one a few times now so I’ll bring it up. Switching to reverse the guide lines are missing, switching out of reverse brings the guide lines up on a white background for a few seconds(with no camera) before going back to the normal screen. Once seeing this, the behavior will repeat until the truck is turned off and restarted. Pretty annoying when I’ve come to rely on these guides to back into my garage. Anyone else have this one?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted (edited)

Did you go to the camera mode and click off trailer mode. 

Edited by Black02Silverado
Controller23 Enthusiast

Controller23

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Did you go to the camera mode and click off trailer mode. 

No, driven regularly then put into reverse


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted
Just now, Controller23 said:


No, driven regularly then put into reverse


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

At least on mine, it you have gone in the camera on the Mylink and hit the various modes, if you put it in trailer and forget to take it out it will remove the backup lines.

Daverado Enthusiast

Daverado

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Controller23 said:

No, driven regularly then put into reverse

 

There are bugs that will cause this regardless.  Workaround is to go to the camera views and turn the lines back on.

  • 4 years later...
2022LiftedRST Enthusiast

2022LiftedRST

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, alpral said:

My 24 GMC SIERRA DOES THE SAME THING. Than later if I don’t shut it off and go to reverse they are there.

My 2022 refresh has done this on and off since new. Now the lines have been gone for a couple of weeks, and according to the dealer won’t ever return. They are blaming it on my lift kit even though it worked 90% of the time… Is your truck lifted?

 

 

image0.jpeg

  • 2 weeks later...
CarlBC New Member

CarlBC

Posted
Posted

Mine start to do this about 2-3 weeks. The dealer try to make an update on my radio and the mechanic was unable to connect his computer to my radio 🙄 on a next appointment and when they receive a new front camera, they will try this. Absolutely not certain that would correct the situation. Sierra 2024 Denali 3.5 inch lift with 38 000km. Exactly the same problem with blue hourglass in the screen. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Edward ASUNCION New Member

Edward ASUNCION

Posted
Posted

I have the same issue on 2022 LTZ. Service guy at the dealership says a front camera is on order and then go from there. It’s been in the service for warranty now 3 times to troubleshoot. I’ll update if it corrects

  • 1 month later...
TxWaldo New Member

TxWaldo

Posted
Posted

Brand new 24 GMC 1500 (-650 miles) and the guidelines have never worked. The selector for this option is ‘greyed’ out on the reverse camera screen, and I have the blue hourglass in the top-left of the screen. 
any ideas on how to get them back on without a trip to the dealership? 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, TxWaldo said:

Brand new 24 GMC 1500 (-650 miles) and the guidelines have never worked. The selector for this option is ‘greyed’ out on the reverse camera screen, and I have the blue hourglass in the top-left of the screen. 
any ideas on how to get them back on without a trip to the dealership? 

 

 

You can try one thing yourself, otherwise its got to go back.

 

Press and hold the end phone call button on your steering wheel for about 20 seconds.  This will reboot the entire infotainment system.  If the camera function does not change, its got to go back .  

TxWaldo New Member

TxWaldo

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

You can try one thing yourself, otherwise its got to go back.

 

Press and hold the end phone call button on your steering wheel for about 20 seconds.  This will reboot the entire infotainment system.  If the camera function does not change, its got to go back .  

I tried this and it did not correct the issue. Really sucks to have to deal with this on a 2 week old truck. 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TxWaldo said:

I tried this and it did not correct the issue. Really sucks to have to deal with this on a 2 week old truck. 

 

 

$hit happens.  More than likely they will try either to see if there is a software update or diagnose if the camera is faulty or something with the radio.  

TxWaldo New Member

TxWaldo

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

$hit happens.  More than likely they will try either to see if there is a software update or diagnose if the camera is faulty or something with the radio.  

Can a radio issue cause this malfunction of the rear backup lines?!  Seems odd. I understand that this entire truck is a computer so nothing is beyond by imagination. 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, TxWaldo said:

Can a radio issue cause this malfunction of the rear backup lines?!  Seems odd. I understand that this entire truck is a computer so nothing is beyond by imagination. 

 

 

Quite a bit of the vehicle is controlled or processed through the radio.  Both with just the regular backup camera and if you have the 360 surround but those also use a video processing module.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 644 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...