Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

I purchased the Scosche Magic Mount and if you don’t have the trailer brake it works perfect on that blank panel. It sticks on with adhesive back and you just put on provided skinny metal plate to your phone to make it connect with magnet. I like this location because it doesn’t block any buttons on dash and it’s close to the USB ports (BTW I use the USB C port). Here’s link to the mount:

 

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DBAVHH0?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_dt_b_asin_title

9930B484-AA33-4153-9AF3-607984E2F16C.jpeg

Edited by RST Mike
Posted

Out of curiosity, why do you need to mount your phone when the truck comes with Android Auto and Apple Carplay?

 

Do the base models not offer those?

Posted
2 hours ago, UGADawgs said:

Saw this on instagram :)

image.thumb.png.4fe59f2909afde0010c62cc797641bb9.png

Lol

 

To each, their own, but to the guy who commented “cleaaaaaaaan”...WTF?!?  Like it or not, it’s anything but clean...

 

on a related note, I do actually like some of these machined molle panels. Especially for the bed and some limited interior use. Haven’t seen anything compatible for our trucks yet though. Would like to see a bracket for the dash cubby from BuiltRight someday...

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, UGADawgs said:

Out of curiosity, why do you need to mount your phone when the truck comes with Android Auto and Apple Carplay?

 

Do the base models not offer those?

CarPlay is too locked down. Constantly finding myself using the phone to pick music or find contacts. I like to have it beside the main screen for these tasks. They need to stop with the nanny controls. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, MidWestAT4 said:

CarPlay is too locked down. Constantly finding myself using the phone to pick music or find contacts. I like to have it beside the main screen for these tasks. They need to stop with the nanny controls. 

Would you expect anything else from Apple but to be locked down with nanny controls ? 

Android gives you wings ?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, UGADawgs said:

Out of curiosity, why do you need to mount your phone when the truck comes with Android Auto and Apple Carplay?

 

Do the base models not offer those?

For me I have the jump seat and didn’t like the usb cable strung across the middle of the truck because you need it plugged in for Apple CarPlay to work. 

Posted
44 minutes ago, UGADawgs said:

Would you expect anything else from Apple but to be locked down with nanny controls ? 

Android gives you wings ?

...broken wings, on a drunken chicken that can’t fly anyway. ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, RST Mike said:

For me I have the jump seat and didn’t like the usb cable strung across the middle of the truck because you need it plugged in for Apple CarPlay to work. 

Don’t understand on a truck with Bluetooth and WiFi why you still need to plug your phone in...

 

Not that I’d even consider switching, but does AndroidAuto work wirelessly in our trucks yet, or are we both still in the stone ages?

Posted
3 minutes ago, MidWestAT4 said:

Don’t understand on a truck with Bluetooth and WiFi why you still need to plug your phone in...

 

Not that I’d even consider switching, but does AndroidAuto work wirelessly in our trucks yet, or are we both still in the stone ages?

I agree! Unfortunately, my understanding is that both CarPlay and android auto must be connected with usb to work. Sounds like we are in the stone ages still. ?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RST Mike said:

For me I have the jump seat and didn’t like the usb cable strung across the middle of the truck because you need it plugged in for Apple CarPlay to work. 

Ahhh, the jump seat, ok, that makes perfect sense. ?

1 hour ago, MidWestAT4 said:

...broken wings, on a drunken chicken that can’t fly anyway. ?

I've owned three different iPhones (4S, 5S, 6 Plus) and had them over 7 years, but switched to Pixel 2XL and now use a 3XL and prefer the Google pure Android experience. For me it is better integrated with Google apps and I don't own a macbook and always hated iTunes. The ability to tune notifications is another thing of beauty. We currently have both iPhones and Androids in our house and some prefer one or the other. As a tech person in the tech field, Androids are just easier to deal with for usability, support, and customization. ymmv. ?

1 hour ago, RST Mike said:

I agree! Unfortunately, my understanding is that both CarPlay and android auto must be connected with usb to work. Sounds like we are in the stone ages still. ?

Correct on these trucks at this time. Which makes it even weirder when the truck has wireless charging, but have to use the cable for the smart-integration. I usually put my phone in the cup holder space between the two cups when plugged in or use the wireless charge spot for short runs and just use SXM and no maps.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, UGADawgs said:

I've owned three different iPhones (4S, 5S, 6 Plus) and had them over 7 years, but switched to Pixel 2XL and now use a 3XL and prefer the Google pure Android experience. For me it is better integrated with Google apps and I don't own a macbook and always hated iTunes. The ability to tune notifications is another thing of beauty. We currently have both iPhones and Androids in our house and some prefer one or the other. As a tech person in the tech field, Androids are just easier to deal with for usability, support, and customization. ymmv. ?

 

I've owned a number of different Android phones over the years as well.  Most recently a Galaxy S8, for a few months. Could never stand the inconsistency between different manufacturers versions of Android and the subsequent battle to figure out which app or config menu to change the exact same setting.  Owning tablets AND phones, this gets to be quite annoying, especially when you switch both out on different cycles close to every year.  On that note, swapping an old device with a new one is very clunky and the importing of data can be very hit or miss.  On iPhones and iPads it's simply a non-event.  I do have a MacBook, though also a ThinkPad, HP ProBook, Microsoft Surface and about 5-6 other desktops, so that really isn't a factor.  Also, I can't really think of any ways I even interface my mobile devices with my laptop, outside of Outlook/Exchange.  

 

As someone who is quite tech-savvy, having owned smart phone's since the iPaq and old Blackberry days and having owned literally 40+ smart phones(No exaggeration), I am fully capable of figuring out how to use them.  I just decided five or six years ago that I no longer wanted to HAVE to learn a new device every time I buy one.  I'll save that tinkering for my trucks, computers and guns.  I just want my phone to work.

 

Really nothing against Android though, but I've been down that road and simply prefer the iPhone/iPad life.

 

Wireless CarPlay/AndroidAuto NEED to get figured out though.  No excuses.  I think wireless CarPlay was actually implemented in a recent BMW as well, so it DOES work.  Probably just a cost-saving measure by GM.  On that note, has anyone used one of these?  https://carplay2air.com/?sca_ref=93288.fQQ4Wbgfh0

Want to buy one, but afraid that a simple phone update could make this a paperweight, since I'm assuming it's just cloning the USB connection.  Seems as though that could be misinterpreted by the device as a security threat.  

 

Edited by MidWestAT4
Posted
14 minutes ago, MidWestAT4 said:

I've owned a number of different Android phones over the years as well.  Most recently a Galaxy S8, for a few months. Could never stand the inconsistency between different manufacturers versions of Android and the subsequent battle to figure out which app or config menu to change the exact same setting.  Owning tablets AND phones, this gets to be quite annoying, especially when you switch both out on different cycles close to every year.  On that note, swapping an old device with a new one is very clunky and the importing of data can be very hit or miss.  On iPhones and iPads it's simply a non-event.  I do have a MacBook, though also a ThinkPad, HP ProBook, Microsoft Surface and about 5-6 other desktops, so that really isn't a factor.  Also, I can't really think of any ways I even interface my mobile devices with my laptop, outside of Outlook/Exchange.  

 

As someone who is quite tech-savvy, having owned smart phone's since the iPaq and old Blackberry days and having owned literally 40+ smart phones(No exaggeration), I am fully capable of figuring out how to use them.  I just decided five or six years ago that I no longer wanted to HAVE to learn a new device every time I buy one.  I'll save that tinkering for my trucks, computers and guns.  I just want my phone to work.

 

Really nothing against Android though, but I've been down that road and simply prefer the iPhone/iPad life.

 

Wireless CarPlay/AndroidAuto NEED to get figured out though.  No excuses.  I think wireless CarPlay was actually implemented in a recent BMW as well, so it DOES work.  Probably just a cost-saving measure by GM.  On that note, has anyone used one of these?  https://carplay2air.com/?sca_ref=93288.fQQ4Wbgfh0

Want to buy one, but afraid that a simple phone update could make this a paperweight, since I'm assuming it's just cloning the USB connection.  Seems as though that could be misinterpreted by the device as a security threat.  

 

I'm with you on that. Unless using a Google Pixel, I'd probably go back to an iPhone. Won't use a Samsung or LG. I've played with other Android phones and they can't come close to the experience on a Pixel. But after experiencing pure Android on the Pixel, plus complete seamlessness with all the Google apps and sites, I just don't think I'd want to go back. Never know though, anything is possible. ??

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, MidWestAT4 said:

I've owned a number of different Android phones over the years as well.  Most recently a Galaxy S8, for a few months. Could never stand the inconsistency between different manufacturers versions of Android and the subsequent battle to figure out which app or config menu to change the exact same setting.  Owning tablets AND phones, this gets to be quite annoying, especially when you switch both out on different cycles close to every year.  On that note, swapping an old device with a new one is very clunky and the importing of data can be very hit or miss.  On iPhones and iPads it's simply a non-event.  I do have a MacBook, though also a ThinkPad, HP ProBook, Microsoft Surface and about 5-6 other desktops, so that really isn't a factor.  Also, I can't really think of any ways I even interface my mobile devices with my laptop, outside of Outlook/Exchange.  

 

As someone who is quite tech-savvy, having owned smart phone's since the iPaq and old Blackberry days and having owned literally 40+ smart phones(No exaggeration), I am fully capable of figuring out how to use them.  I just decided five or six years ago that I no longer wanted to HAVE to learn a new device every time I buy one.  I'll save that tinkering for my trucks, computers and guns.  I just want my phone to work.

 

Really nothing against Android though, but I've been down that road and simply prefer the iPhone/iPad life.

 

Wireless CarPlay/AndroidAuto NEED to get figured out though.  No excuses.  I think wireless CarPlay was actually implemented in a recent BMW as well, so it DOES work.  Probably just a cost-saving measure by GM.  On that note, has anyone used one of these?  https://carplay2air.com/?sca_ref=93288.fQQ4Wbgfh0

Want to buy one, but afraid that a simple phone update could make this a paperweight, since I'm assuming it's just cloning the USB connection.  Seems as though that could be misinterpreted by the device as a security threat.  

 

I have looked at the carplay2air as well but just not sure about it. There is a thread on here about that where a couple people are about to test them out and some have used it and don’t have great reviews. Here’s a link if you want to follow: 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,532 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...