Jump to content

Following a Hopeful Stretch UAW Now Says Strike Deal Moving Backwards


Recommended Posts

Posted

GM Flint new Silverado70.jpg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
10-7-2019

The United Auto Workers (UAW) strike against General Motors has entered its fourth week. After initial reports a week ago, and also last Friday, union negotiators now say that the bargaining has "Taken a turn for the worse." The union claims GM backtracked on some provisions that were important to the union. 

 

"The leadership is a little bit nervous about being able to ratify and so everything is taking longer. You don't have the leadership leading, they're looking over their shoulder at the membership all the time wondering if the deal is gonna fly," said economist Patrick Anderson. The leadership is also being arrested for corruption. This weekend, the UAW announced it had put a 17-state union manager, Vance Pearson, on leave.  Pearson is being charged in a federal corruption probe.

 

Related Story: UAW Strike Results In Closure Of Mexican GM Truck Plants

Posted
11 minutes ago, Gorehamj said:

GM Flint new Silverado70.jpg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
10-7-2019

The United Auto Workers (UAW) strike against General Motors has entered its fourth week. After initial reports a week ago, and also last Friday, union negotiators now say that the bargaining has "Taken a turn for the worse." The union claims GM backtracked on some provisions that were important to the union. 

 

"The leadership is a little bit nervous about being able to ratify and so everything is taking longer. You don't have the leadership leading, they're looking over their shoulder at the membership all the time wondering if the deal is gonna fly," said economist Patrick Anderson. The leadership is also being arrested for corruption. This weekend, the UAW announced it had put a 17-state union manager, Vance Pearson, on leave.  Pearson is being charged in a federal corruption probe.

 

Related Story: UAW Strike Results In Closure Of Mexican GM Truck Plants

I would steer clear of any GM product at this time, i can't imagine moral and quality were good with the last few weeks of work done at their plants.

Posted
58 minutes ago, BIGDOGx said:

I would steer clear of any GM product at this time, i can't imagine moral and quality were good with the last few weeks of work done at their plants.

I would agree with that to a point and it's probably the viewpoint of the union as a whole.  But individually I would still maintain my ethics, integrity, and professionalism.  I couldn't see myself sacrificing safety in one of these trucks because of a union fight.  Just my personal view, results in a good nights sleep.

Posted

I'm all in for the rights of workers, including a strike.

At the end it's just a show off how's got the longest breath.

My bets are on GM.

If I was "GM", I'd drag this thing out until the strike fund is getting thin and then I'd offer a personal deal to any worker willing to return to work..

I don't think that the workers in the US facilities are under-paid or anything like that.

I think that most of them just see the profit that the company makes and are getting jealous.

 

My boss makes a shitload of money. But when the topic comes up within my co-workers, I say "You live in a society where you have all the chances to do the same. Just quit drinking beer with your buddy's after work and keep working. Leave your family alone on the weekend and keep working. Stop looking at your watch at 3pm and keep working. Leave your phone on at night and answer the call and keep working. ... " ...and so on.

 

You live in a free country and you don't leave out anything to show it to the world. You despise socialism and communism. Fair enough. But don't start to cry when the system is falling down on you.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

Posted

Well it doesn’t help when your truck has been in the service department for over 3 weeks awaiting parts because of this BS! They need to get a move on and figure it out!! 

Posted
15 hours ago, j-ten-ner said:

I'm all in for the rights of workers, including a strike.

At the end it's just a show off how's got the longest breath.

My bets are on GM.

If I was "GM", I'd drag this thing out until the strike fund is getting thin and then I'd offer a personal deal to any worker willing to return to work..

I don't think that the workers in the US facilities are under-paid or anything like that.

I think that most of them just see the profit that the company makes and are getting jealous.

 

My boss makes a shitload of money. But when the topic comes up within my co-workers, I say "You live in a society where you have all the chances to do the same. Just quit drinking beer with your buddy's after work and keep working. Leave your family alone on the weekend and keep working. Stop looking at your watch at 3pm and keep working. Leave your phone on at night and answer the call and keep working. ... " ...and so on.

 

You live in a free country and you don't leave out anything to show it to the world. You despise socialism and communism. Fair enough. But don't start to cry when the system is falling down on you.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

I tend to agree with this logic. I live down the road from the largest GM facility in North America which is in Spring Hill, TN (near Nashville). I've run into many of these guys and had lengthy conversations; please no one make the generic statement that I am going purely on anecdotal evidence or anything - it's just using common sense and my interactions with a "focus group" if you will. Also I have seen/met other facilities including GM Arlington, Toyota San Antonio, GM Fort Wayne.

 

I tend to take complaints with a grain of salt because it's true, jealously does play a role; and the major fact is yes, choices make all the difference. So many forget/ignore the difficulties and sacrifices that it does take to 'get to the top/higher up' and like so many other industries, it's very easy to complain/claim that you're so undervalued or paid and also that he got a hand out. This is true too - there is a buddy/buddy system but it exists everywhere, ie bet you wouldn't complain if your friend who was a cop didn't write you a ticket because you were friends.

Posted

You know, back when unions actually genuinely helped the worker, instead of funneling money straight to the democrat party, and breaking people's legs or showing up at their house in the middle of the night that didn't comply with their wishes, I'd be on board. These days, I think the days of the union are behind us. This may or may not be true of the smaller ones, but is definitely true of the larger ones. They've become bloated and corrupt, and in bed with their bloated and corrupt friends in government.

 

Why does a new truck cost $50 LARGE (and up ...)? There's your answer. I'm all for making a great wage, but when it sucks the life out of the company you work for, what good is it?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Jsdirt said:

You know, back when unions actually genuinely helped the worker, instead of funneling money straight to the democrat party, and breaking people's legs or showing up at their house in the middle of the night that didn't comply with their wishes, I'd be on board. These days, I think the days of the union are behind us. This may or may not be true of the smaller ones, but is definitely true of the larger ones. They've become bloated and corrupt, and in bed with their bloated and corrupt friends in government.

 

Why does a new truck cost $50 LARGE (and up ...)? There's your answer. I'm all for making a great wage, but when it sucks the life out of the company you work for, what good is it?

I can agree - but a point could be made with the old adage power corrupts... and as the cyclical nature of history has shown it's not the first time nor will it be the last. Also the adage of don't bite the hand that feeds seems appropriate  then again greed does set in as well as necessity - if many are  using and abusing the union or system, you'd be losing money/purchasing power if you didn't. Terrible really.

Posted

The problem will correct itself.  Pickups are already being priced out of the market.  Dealers are offering seven year financing and leases are driving leasers further and further underwater.  People can’t afford them anymore.  

Posted

leasing is the worst thing you can do.  You end up paying for the depreciation and lots more. 

Posted

I agree ... but people still keep doing it, Ryan! ?

Posted

Yes they do.  But some people only learn the hard way.

Posted
6 hours ago, Colossus said:

Yes they do.  But some people only learn the hard way.

Yeh, and while they are learning they  continually roll their unpaid balance into their new lease making their note ever larger.  It’s crazy. Reminds me of the parable “The Frog In A Pot Of Water”....

Posted

I've never been part of a union so I'm not pro or con.  But is the union skilled, experienced workers?  If so, does the the union make up the company?  If not, does the company not acknowledge the union and sacrifice credibility and hire non-skilled, inexperienced workers?  The result of the strike, we may hear both sides got what they wanted, the company will be a few million light in the pocket, and the union members may be late with a house payment.  Both the company and union will land on their feet and the loser in all this will probably be the consumer.

Posted

I’m not anti union.  I’m ok with workers joining a union if they want.  I’m not for a closed shop though.  I believe people should have the right to work whether they’re in a union or not.  It should be an employees choice.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 693 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...