Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Nice!  How many miles are on it?  Don't forget the transfer case fluid.  Easy to change out and the ATL comes in a squeeze pack which makes it easy to do.



43k miles. I didn’t know Amsoil made transfer case fluid for these.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
9 minutes ago, Daryl Z71 said:

 

 


43k miles. I didn’t know Amsoil made transfer case fluid for these.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes,  I have been running it in both my 2002 and now my 2019.    AMSOIL ATL

 

ATLPK.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

 Nice dude.  That 6.2 is no joke in that big truck.  I do miss my ‘14 6.2 Sierra.

  • Like 1
Posted
Yes,  I have been running it in both my 2002 and now my 2019.    AMSOIL ATL
 
ATLPK.jpg.0e44c236479ee60cb7f1c231a7582e79.jpg




So this is okay to use in place of the autotrac fluid?
Posted
 Nice dude.  That 6.2 is no joke in that big truck.  I do miss my ‘14 6.2 Sierra.



Yea this thing is impressive for a pickup weighing over 5k lbs!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Daryl Z71 said:

 

 

 


So this is okay to use in place of the autotrac fluid?

Yes, AMSOIL's ATL is good to go in place of the Auto Trac II.  My 2002 called for the Auto Trac II and I used that until AMSOIL came out with the ATL and then I switched over to it.  No issues at all. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Yes, AMSOIL's ATL is good to go in place of the Auto Trac II.  My 2002 called for the Auto Trac II and I used that until AMSOIL came out with the ATL and then I switched over to it.  No issues at all. 




Okay. So is it ATL or ATF? The link that you posted I went to was for ATF.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
8 minutes ago, Daryl Z71 said:

 

 

 


Okay. So is it ATL or ATF? The link that you posted I went to was for ATF.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, it is the ATL which is the low viscosity ATF.   It is what goes in the transfer case.

Posted
Yes, it is the ATL which is the low viscosity ATF.   It is what goes in the transfer case.



Okay. How many quarts did your 2019 take?
Posted
8 hours ago, Daryl Z71 said:

 

 


Okay. How many quarts did your 2019 take?

Just over a qt.  So 2 qts will over the T case.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

Just over a qt.  So 2 qts will over the T case.

 

 

Okay sounds good. Thanks!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/7/2019 at 6:03 PM, Daryl Z71 said:

 

 

 


Okay. So is it ATL or ATF? The link that you posted I went to was for ATF.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

 

GM Spec is Dex VI ATF, so Nick's got you covered.

  • Like 1
Posted

Got the intake tube installed. Sure does make a difference in engine noise, and I love it!


dd450c817d79c41a78162687dd39fdc6.jpg

bec060d386f3cba179587c7773ce8e7c.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...