Jump to content

Trying to decide if should trade in 2500hd 6.0 gas for new 3.0 diesel, have same tow capacity


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, ckes2500 said:

When I first bought the trailer I had an Avalanche and I understand about the difference between 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton towing, night and day, I've considered the 5.3 with max tow but not real sure how i'd like since same hp and tq as current truck and now with the motors having the DFM, those electronics scare me more then the new 3.0 diesel. From what i've researched the 5.3's only get a little better then my current 6.0, maybe 15-17 mpg in the real world, I could be wrong but that's what I have seen a lot of. I'm sure the 6.2l would be fun but not to thrilled about have to always run premium fuel.  Currently my truck is not my daily driver, I have a little beater car that gets 30 mpg, but who knows how long it will be till that thing needs some $ put into it.  Thought of having another 3 year bumper to bumper warranty is nice but one way or another your still paying.  Anybody tow with both the 5.3 max tow and a 3/4 ton with gas motor, just curious how it handled.  I probably shouldn't be worried about the tow factor too much considering its gonna be a while before getting new travel trailer, just like to plan ahead and have option available if need be.  Once again appreciate the responses and opinions, its helping me decide whether to do 

Over the last 4600 miles I have gotten 18.6 mpg.  I daily the truck in heavy traffic (for example, a worst case last week it took me 2.5 hrs to go 26 miles, normally it takes me around 1.25 hrs).  Best tank has been 19.4mpg, worst tank was 15 (2nd fuel up).  

 

If you're putting 15000 miles a year on your truck, the difference yearly fuel cost difference 13 mpg for the 2500 HD gasser, and 29mpg for the 3.0L diesel 1500 at prices $2/regular, $2.65 diesel (that's my fuel prices locally) would be ~$940/year fuel savings.  Since it is not your daily driver, and we assume about 5000 miles a year in truck driving, it's $313/year in savings.  

 

Don't go into this thinking that fuel economy is going to be some sort of world changing number.  If you're only driving 5k/year in the truck it's ~$300/year or about $25/month.  

If you want it because you want it, that's the only reason.  Capability and financially it doesn't make any sense though.

 

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I wish gas was only 2 bucks a gallon, I'm paying over 4 bucks a gallon for regular and diesel is a hair cheaper

Posted
12 minutes ago, ckes2500 said:

I wish gas was only 2 bucks a gallon, I'm paying over 4 bucks a gallon for regular and diesel is a hair cheaper

At $4/gal for reg, $3.95/gal for diesel and 5k year, you'll save $850/year in fuel or about $72/month.

 

fixed a typo

Posted
On 11/3/2019 at 1:42 PM, ckes2500 said:

Currently have 2014 GMC 2500hd with 6.0 gas and 3.73 gears, no longer have travel trailer that was 7800 lbs., so I don't necessarily need the HD now but  will probably get another one in a few years down the road around the same weight.  Went and test drove the 2020 Chevy 1500 with 3.0 diesel, drove real good, power was smooth and strong, I know when I get new trailer payload will be a factor but towing capacity will be the same considering my current truck only has a tow capacity of 9400 lbs. and so does the new 3.0 diesel.  The better fuel mileage would be huge plus considering only 13 mpg in truck now and thats being gently on throttle.  Just don't want to get rid of current truck and regret when I go to tow with only 1/2 ton truck.  Even when I was towing only usually went around 100-200 miles round trip but there is a lot of hilly areas in my area. Another consideration is dependability of the new diesel.  Any responses are appreciated

Towing and empty comparison of the 3.0 chev and 3.9 ram.  Same day same trailer.  Not quite as heavy you had.  They said this one was about 7000lb

This seems to be on relatively flat ground but it is with cruise on at 70 mph. They are pulling an enclosed trailer weighted with a water tank.  Also has a rack on top which will increase drag.

Chev was running along at 1500 rpm...so I'd assume that means it was in 10th.

My '16 5.3L max tow 8 speed would not have been in 8th.

Posted
1 hour ago, ckes2500 said:

What kind of gas milage you get on the 5.3 with max towing, wont be towing anything for at least couple years

Towed a 14 x 7 v-nose tandem (smooth sided) from Port Huron to Phoenix on the interstate. 

 

It would have been lighter than the one they tested, and it did not have a rack on top. 

 

Typically 0 - 5 above posted speeds.  So a lot of 70 - 75, similar to what they tested.  Truck always it was able to maintain speed (ie it got the job done) but entire trip it was probably in 8th for less than 15 miles. 6/7 common, 5th occasionally.

 

Mileage was usually between 8.5 and 9.5.  Makes for a lot of 'early' fills when stations are further apart (don't really need fuel, but can't quite be sure of making the next fuel location)

 

Posted

Have about 3200 miles on mine now, still Loving the power, sound, and mileage. Granted my mileage did take a hit when I put larger duratracs on. Current tank im on I'm averaging close to 21 with a good amount of idling and short trips. Have no problem getting over 23 with a little longer city trips and less idling time. Now before the duratracs I was averaging 26-27 only on town so I may switch out to a set of Summer tires come spring. I have not towed anything larger than a pontoon for longer than a few miles so can't comment there.

For me in the summer months I put a lot of city miles on in the construction industry so the money saved was an easy choice. Diesel around here is 2.80 which is about 30 cents more expensive than regular and 30 cents cheaper than premium. From my old 6.2 which required premium there is a pretty significant cost savings per mile.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted

If it is any consolation I did a 2,000 mile round trip pulling 7K. I didn't even consider taking my 6.2L 1500 even though it would have towed stronger than my 2500 6oh and better on gas. The benefits to the 2500 chassis are totally noticeable. More stable, better braking, even if the power is way less adequate the truck still feels better and safer. If you're a towing or payload guy, 2500 is a necessity. If you're only going a few hundred miles per year, the 1500 would suit you better on a day to day basis. You cant compare the livability of driving the 1500 vs. the 2500 in a daily driven situation. 

 

If you put on serious miles, stay with a 2500, if your just going to the lake out of town a couple times per year, go 1500. 

Posted

As an '18 Ram EcoDiesel owner I say WAIT on the 3.0L Duramax. The EcoDiesel had (and still has) all kinds of problems, including a nationwide recall on all '14-18 models due to EGR cooler failures and subsequent fires. 

 

Let the new Duramax mature a couple years before trading away your tried and true 6.0L.

 

Posted

Thanks for all the feed back, never really was interested in the ram eco diesels. Sucks for all the problems, do you regret getting the 1/2 ton diesel.  What kind of MPG is anyone getting with the  newer 5.3 with max tow and the 8 speed trans.  The more I look at the trucks I am seeing crazy deals on the 2019's with 5.3 and max tow.  The DEF systems seem to keep screwing up the diesels.  Still looking

Posted

No regrets on the half ton diesel here. Averaging 26 mpg (and there are tunes available to turn off the EGR system). I've heard nothing but praise for the Chevy 3.0L diesel so far, even from the RAM guys. I think it will be a fine engine but I'd still give it a year or two before getting into one. 

Posted

For you guys that have had a 6.2L, how does the lack of power feel on the 3.0L.. the HP difference is really noticeable on paper.. wondering how it feels in the truck? 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,782
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Newest Member
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 6,762 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was around and remember that era very well, so I'm calling b/s on that statement. If they were that bad no police department or taxi company would've bought a single one ... but they were used in both services (and fire) for DECADES. They were bulletproof and proven. Even the early 21st century ones weren't too bad! The early models were legendary.   Mine is proof, but people like atlas are blinded by agenda and refuse to believe facts right before their very eyes.   Even decades after they were built, a new generation started driving them, posting all their builds and shenanigans on Grandmarq.net and Crownvic.net. The failures would show up then, since they all were deep past 100k-150k miles by that point, and younger drivers tend to be a little aggressive, especially with vehicles than can lay a one-tire fire for as long as you hold your foot in it. They've more than proven themselves over the decades.   The only thing that'll really take them out is road salt. The bodies and sheet metal were garbage. A victim of the cheapout FoMoCo and GM have been partaking in before then, and since.   Today it's the stuff that counts - the undercarriage that rots away first!    GMs Caprice was no slouch either. Reliable as a stone ax - the opposite of what they build now.    
    • Let me know how your vehicles do in 10 years. You don't know ******, kid. 😂    There's a reason that Panther platform was used as police, fire, and taxi service for DECADES ... long before you were born, apparently.
    • If your connector also has a big lever to get the connector on and off, you don't want to force the lever either way, as it becomes a bigger problem if you bust the lever or the mechanism it works.
    • It's just useful to disconnect the battery to prevent odd shorting out when unplugging/plugging stuff together.  I also  touch the two cable ends together (after disonnecting) to drain the small amount of stored battery energy in various modules.   I believe the main system where you need to be more concerned with, so you need to do the above and then wait some time, iss when you are working on the air bag system, to prevent inadvertent firing of the air bags.   The in-cab switches are just that, plain switches, it's generally not a problem to swap them in/out.  For my '12, I'll get an error message on the dash if I power up the truck w them unplugged, but that's it (power up= turn the ignition on).   The ITBC located above the spare tire is a computer that manages the trailer brake system.  That is probably more important to have the battery disconnected.  It does have to be programmed to the truck, either before or after it's installed, for it to work.  For my '12, I had a very hard time reinstalling the main connector to it (IDK if yours is the same or not), it turned out the silicon seal was jamming up, preventing it from going on all the way.  I finally got it fully installed by lubing the seal with a bit of dielectric grease, then it slid on and latched in place easily.
    • JR ! I just got the truck back from the Dealership today . The technician did a cold remote start on the truck this morning and it made the noise . It was determined that it was a starter issue and replaced it under warranty . Of course   it did not make the sound after a new starter was put in because the truck was not cold . We will we see what happens tomorrow morning when I start the truck cold  . Keep tuned !   Oh I found a video on YouTube of a cold start and it did the same thing your truck and mine do , I will see if I can find it and post it up
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...