Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok I just bought a new 2020 GMC 3500HD, so far  I am very happy with this truck. GMC really did a lot of thinking on building this truck. I am just amazed with all the technology on this truck. Now I have run into one problem. I am not much of a tech guy but I will try to explain this problem. I have an apple I phone. I am able to use voice command  on the truck and I am able to send a text message. but when it comes to receiving a text message it only shows up on my phone and not on the screen and no notifications sounds that you have received a text message. I called GMC and they told me that the only way your text message will work is if you are connected to apple car play. Well I did it and it works with the USB cord plug in.  I fine it hard to believe that it won't work with out the cord.  Has anyone else experiencing this problem.

Posted

Apple CarPlay only works with the iPhone plugged in, unfortunately.

GM also got rid of the native text app, which is a PITA also.

Posted

I just don't get this how unsafe, now lets see my wife alexis is 3 years olds and you are able to send a text message through the voice command. I find it really hard to believe that GMC would cheap out on this. Unbelievable. How unsafe for GMC to do this.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Pat Papasergia said:

I just don't get this how unsafe, now lets see my wife alexis is 3 years olds and you are able to send a text message through the voice command. I find it really hard to believe that GMC would cheap out on this. Unbelievable. How unsafe for GMC to do this.

Frustrating you cant do it wireless but certainly nothing unsafe about connecting via usb before you start driving, works fine.

  • Like 1
Posted
I just don't get this how unsafe, now lets see my wife alexis is 3 years olds and you are able to send a text message through the voice command. I find it really hard to believe that GMC would cheap out on this. Unbelievable. How unsafe for GMC to do this.

It’s still hands free via Apple CarPlay. Your texts will still be read to you but you have to plug your phone in so the vehicle can connect to CarPlay.
There’s just no longer a native app.
Posted

Many other manufacturers are starting to do this as well, it's not just GM. I have friends with other makes they've purchased recently and their vehicle does the same in regards to texts. If it's plugged in, you can also send and reply to FB Messages, too.

Posted

Well with this technology nowadays, I just find it hard to believe GMC would do this.  I don't text that often so I don't have a need to plug my cord into the usb port, for car play, that just me. Now you received a text on your phone instead on the screen..  Such a great truck but this would of made it a better truck. Ya I know its not that big of a deal, I will get use to it. I am glad I found an answer to my question. Thanks guys

Posted

Has anyone linked it Bluetooth and then not allow it to send and receive messages, etc? Maybe that is an answer, but it may also not allow calls to go through, either.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

2019 AT4 and mine only works plugged in.   Pretty stupid if you ask me. You put in a wireless charger that I can’t use.... I have a 2018 Jeep and a 2018 Ford and both those vehicles let you hear your text and respond to via Bluetooth. 

Posted
Can't you just ask Siri to send a text for you?

That’s what I’ve been doing to compensate. I’ll just “Hey Siri...” and have her read/send texts for me. It’s less than ideal but at least it’s still hands free & through the vehicle speakers when connected via Bluetooth.
  • 8 months later...
Posted

I traded my 2017 F250 for a 2020 GMC Sierra Denali....Fully loaded and when you connect the phone bluetooth not only does it not reccognize or play text messages it also mutes them so you don't even know they came in. It has a wireless charger but I have to plug it is to use Android Auto?? When I use Android Auto the texts sometimes come in and sometimes it asks if I want to reply and 1 out of 100 times it actually lets me reply. My 2017 F250 worked flawlessly wirelessly. I could not reply to them through the truck but at least I knew they came in, I could hear them and could see if they were important. And if needed I would call the person through the controls on the steering wheel. I run a small business with my phone and I have 700 miles on a $80k truck and I am thinking about trading it in. Otherwise I will need to disconnect the bluetooth and use the phone in my hand like it's 2005. Who is the idiot that programmed these trucks ????

Posted

I just picked my truck up yesterday. 

Is there not a way to have  text message notifications or to listen to them?

 

My Ram would alert me and would read them to me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...