Jump to content

6.2 intake


Chewy21

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm debating on buying an s&b intake for my 2017 6.2. Only performance mods are a full Corsa sport exhaust and Range AFM disabler and gets pretty decent fuel mileage and a lot smiles per gallon. Catch can will be in the future as well. 
 

I know in the past that a MIT tube and drop in filter did wonders for the nnbs but I've seen the Blackbear dyno sheet saying the MIT tube doesn't really do much for the k2 platforms. I know I'm not looking for 5 mpg gain, but just seeing if it's worth spending the 300 on the intake. I'll do a tune down the road, but til the warranty runs out I'm waiting. 

3FDD603A-B045-4B1A-808D-6E31CE1D0778.jpeg

Posted

I'm contemplating the same thing. I've got the 6.2 also.

 

Do intakes show gain in HP and TQ? Yes, they do. But why do they gain? These Gen V DI motors run very rich in open loop WOT, especially above 3500 rpms. When you add more airflow that actually leans it out causing the power bump. Makes me think if you just properly tune you'd get a very similar power bump.

 

Another point. All to often mods are discussed in terms of WOT gains. How often do you actually drive wide open? With my 6.2 any speed under 25 and over 50% throttle I'm burning rubber. Is a CAI going to improve part throttle low speed driveability? Idk. Will it improve HP and TQ? Yes. But is that primarily because it's big rich to begin with? Idk. Will it make some great sounds and give you a warm fuzzy feeling? 100%. 

 

Do it for the aesthetics and the soundtrack!

Posted
9 hours ago, lucas287 said:

Do intakes show gain in HP and TQ? Yes, they do. But why do they gain? These Gen V  With my 6.2 any speed under 25 and over 50% throttle I'm burning rubber. 

I think you need some new tires

Posted
8 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

I think you need some new tires

Ha...yes I do. Crappy GY Eagle ls2... gotta be the worst tire ever. After I read that comment again it was a bit dramatic. 

 

My point is to illustrate that most of us probably don't hoon around like were Ken Block 24/7. I've cammed two different V8s, one a 5.7 Hemi and the other a 2v 4.6. Did I pick up some screaming top end? Hell yes! But i also lost some dynamic compression which hurt low speed torque and I think I missed that more. 

 

I'm much more focused now on doing mods that help with every day driving. Wife approved driving as I call it. For that, I'm positive the stock setup flows plenty. 

Posted

Well if that's the case, I'll just look into a drop in filter for now instead of buying a full cai.

Posted

2 more cents of advice: stick with something dry flow. Oiled filters CAN cost a MAF which can impact fueling. It's a redundant system getting feedback from the O2 sensors so it should be "fine" but the airflow tables populate a lot of other things like driver demand and shift schedules. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

for what its worth. Ive had blackbear tunes for a few years. On my last tahoe I had the airraid setup and an aggressive tune. Sounded great. Performed very well.

I just got a 17 sierra denali about a month ago. Moved just fine. But I wanted a bit more. And planning on holding off on a tune until fall at least. Blackbear showed the AFE yielded the most gain. And didn't require a tune. Based on my experience with them I was sold. 

Install was simple. And yes. It feels different. It does seem to like the increased flow. From about 20% throttle on you feel it. It definitely sounds more aggressive. More than I expected. Its got a bit of a growl when in v4. But I dont see a way around it. But my vote is worth the price of admission. According to BB dyno test. Decent cost for return. Getting power from a gasser is never cheap.

Posted

As a project, a group of students asked me if they could do a test on 4 CAI. It was the AFE GT, Airraid MIT, K&N and some weird name cheap thing off Amazon. They tapped in a sensor a little before the TB to check flow and temps. There was definitely a flow increase compared to stock, with the MIT producing the least amount of increase. There was also only a 3% difference comparing the other 3 against each other. The K&N and other one did have some increased air temps detected. Now when the stock air filter was replaced with a higher flowing one, the MIT was even closer to the other three. Then they cut out the plate in the stock air box and the MIT was equal with the other three.

So my opinion is that CAI systems are a complete waste of money. The stock box is just as good as any of the aftermarket ones, with a tiny mod that a 10yr old can do. The restriction mainly comes from the tube and filter. Change those out, quick mod, and save money.

One last thing, the Amazon one was out of spec and didn't line up the best and took some forcing, so I would just stay away from those cheap never heard of ones.

All my opinion

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
On 6/20/2020 at 8:13 PM, CMC76 said:

for what its worth. Ive had blackbear tunes for a few years. On my last tahoe I had the airraid setup and an aggressive tune. Sounded great. Performed very well.

I just got a 17 sierra denali about a month ago. Moved just fine. But I wanted a bit more. And planning on holding off on a tune until fall at least. Blackbear showed the AFE yielded the most gain. And didn't require a tune. Based on my experience with them I was sold. 

Install was simple. And yes. It feels different. It does seem to like the increased flow. From about 20% throttle on you feel it. It definitely sounds more aggressive. More than I expected. Its got a bit of a growl when in v4. But I dont see a way around it. But my vote is worth the price of admission. According to BB dyno test. Decent cost for return. Getting power from a gasser is never cheap.

 

Heard some good reviews on the AFE CAI......might get one myself in the near future.

Posted

25whp for $400, nothig

On 5/22/2020 at 11:55 PM, lucas287 said:

I'm contemplating the same thing. I've got the 6.2 also.

 

 

Do intakes show gain in HP and TQ? Yes, they do. But why do they gain? These Gen V DI motors run very rich in open loop WOT, especially above 3500 rpms. When you add more airflow that actually leans it out causing the power bump. Makes me think if you just properly tune you'd get a very similar power bump.

That’s a big nope

 

you can look at dyno charts and tell the difference between increased air flow and bullshit lean conditions.

 

An increase in flow will show little gains down low and start to shine as rpm’s increase. Why....because airflow is low at low rpm and a shitty oem intake would not be restricted at low flow.

 

if you look at the blackbear dyno’s, it is clear as day that pretty much all of them relieve the intake path of a restriction. Where that restriction is I don’t know.

Posted

I went with the AFE GT based on BB's dyno test and talking to a couple other guys. If you are truly going after more HP/TQ, spend your money on a tune and new headers/exhaust first. If you want something that makes your 6.2 sound even better (I really love how it woke it up - not overbearing but a great balanced rumble), makes your engine bay look cool, and *might* give you some additional gains then go with the AFE GT. I also like that it opened up my engine bay more to get to other areas if I need. I added a catch can after I took this picture as well. Can also chat about that if you have questions.

 

image.thumb.png.0db2d810dd1b4b3eef2d271e40dd4c4c.png

Posted

I feel that the catch can is a whole can of worms itself. A lot of guys run one and seen that catch quite a bit while others have caught very lil or none at all. I have a buddy with a 2020 Silverado 6.2 ltz and said he hasn't caught anything with it. I'm sure my 2017 would be a different story. 
 

I haven't ordered a intake for mine 6.2 yet and I was going to do a dry filter since I live in Oklahoma and it's more of a drier/dusty area. As for a catch can, I haven't added one but I'm debating on getting a amazon one with upgraded fuel lines. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Chewy21 said:

I feel that the catch can is a whole can of worms itself. A lot of guys run one and seen that catch quite a bit while others have caught very lil or none at all. I have a buddy with a 2020 Silverado 6.2 ltz and said he hasn't caught anything with it. I'm sure my 2017 would be a different story. 
 

I haven't ordered a intake for mine 6.2 yet and I was going to do a dry filter since I live in Oklahoma and it's more of a drier/dusty area. As for a catch can, I haven't added one but I'm debating on getting a amazon one with upgraded fuel lines. 

Yeah a catch can really is an entirely different conversation. I put mine in after the top end of my engine had to be rebuilt (coolant leaking internally through both heads - GM covered the bill). Figured with everything cleaned up and new, it was the perfect time to install one. Here's a pic of how much my catch can has caught in roughly 25k miles. Don't mean to derail the thread, just thought I'd make a quick comment about it since you mentioned debating installing one along with the cai. And take all this for what you will, I know catch cans are hotly debated. I just figured why not try it, could be a waste of money but certainly won't hurt anything.

 

image.thumb.png.5202bd20a95ef0cd12e37a7fe4b11e45.png

Posted
7 minutes ago, midwestdenaliguy said:

Yeah a catch can really is an entirely different conversation. I put mine in after the top end of my engine had to be rebuilt (coolant leaking internally through both heads - GM covered the bill). Figured with everything cleaned up and new, it was the perfect time to install one. Here's a pic of how much my catch can has caught in roughly 25k miles. Don't mean to derail the thread, just thought I'd make a quick comment about it since you mentioned debating installing one along with the cai. And take all this for what you will, I know catch cans are hotly debated. I just figured why not try it, could be a waste of money but certainly won't hurt anything.

 

image.thumb.png.5202bd20a95ef0cd12e37a7fe4b11e45.png

For sure. I mean a lot of guys run the amazon one and works just as well as a elite supposedly. I may actually order one today. I did however see a few guys say that it voided the warranty by doing that. If I wasn't moving from my dealership I wouldn't be worried about it. I guess I could just take it off before it goes in. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 488 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...