Jump to content

First trip with the 3.0L Duramax

swervin36
 Share

Recommended Posts

swervin36 Enthusiast

swervin36

Posted
Posted

I usually make a trip from Colorado to Alabama in March-April to do some fishing and help my mother do some stuff around the house.  This year I had to wait till July due to everything going on.  To say the least I was very pleased with how the truck performed on the trip.  I like to take the southern route cutting down through New Mexico and picking up I-40 in Amarillo.  Last year I made the same trip in a 18 Crew Cab 4wd Sierra with a 5.3.  For that trip the MPG going out was about 18-21.  On the return after passing Oklahoma City, I had a head wind and best the truck would do was about 16.  With the Baby Duramax the trip average was 22-24.  I was easily able to go over 500 miles between fillups.  With a little prior planning I was also able to find diesel between 1.99-2.09 a gal.  Total trip was 3100 miles and DEF usage was 2.5 gal.

  • Like 1
TNTSierra Senior Enthusiast

TNTSierra

Posted
Posted

I have read nothing but good things about this motor. I think GM hit a home run on this motor. Really glad they took their time on it, did lots of research, and built it from the ground up. Unlike what Furd did with their diesel and just brought it over from Land Rover. Congrats on the truck MPG's. 

  • Like 1
deepsouth New Member

deepsouth

Posted
Posted

What was your best millage when going thru the mostly flat interstate driving? I would have thought that with all those highway miles your average would have been better.

swervin36 Enthusiast

swervin36

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 hours ago, deepsouth said:

What was your best millage when going thru the mostly flat interstate driving? I would have thought that with all those highway miles your average would have been better.

Me too.  I was expecting closer to 27-30 for the trip.  Especially after passing Ok City on the trip out.  Now I do have a lead foot and had the cruise set at 80 for most of the trip.  If I had kept it at 75 or below that would have probably gotten me into the 27 range.  Still pretty impressed with the mileage I did get.  I have also made a few trips to Denver and seen a 30 mpg average.    

tonto340 Enthusiast

tonto340

Posted
Posted

I have made one trip in my 20 Silverado with the 3L diesel. From south of the Roanoke area in Virginia to the Baltimore area in Maryland on I-81, I-66, I-495 and I-95 I averaged 29 mpg (hand calculated) with a few speed runs to 95mph. The trip was 325 miles. ?

 

SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, swervin36 said:

Me too.  I was expecting closer to 27-30 for the trip.  Especially after passing Ok City on the trip out.  Now I do have a lead foot and had the cruise set at 80 for most of the trip.  If I had kept it at 75 or below that would have probably gotten me into the 27 range.  Still pretty impressed with the mileage I did get.  I have also made a few trips to Denver and seen a 30 mpg average.    

Every time I see a 3.0 post that says low to mid lows on highway,  I'm always disappointed to hear,  then I find out that was at or near 80mph.  Now that is impressive MPG at that speed.   My 6.2 would be a couple mpg off its highway rating too if I kept it around 80.

 

The fact that you can do 80 in a truck and comfortably get over 20mpg is impressive - especially with your leveling kit and tires.

Phatty Enthusiast

Phatty

Posted
Posted

Note the cruise control setting.  I had just exited freeway.  These trucks are ridiculous. 

A9CCF170-57DE-45FA-8D7A-2455984BE541.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Duramax3oh Enthusiast

Duramax3oh

Posted
Posted
On 7/16/2020 at 12:09 AM, swervin36 said:

Me too.  I was expecting closer to 27-30 for the trip.  Especially after passing Ok City on the trip out.  Now I do have a lead foot and had the cruise set at 80 for most of the trip.  If I had kept it at 75 or below that would have probably gotten me into the 27 range.  Still pretty impressed with the mileage I did get.  I have also made a few trips to Denver and seen a 30 mpg average.    

Nice. My wife drove the truck on our last trip back home. She has a lead foot and was absolutely screaming down the highway. I thought for sure a trooper would bust her but luckily not. Definitely 80+ with a heavy foot. I just looked at the DIC for the 280 miles after reset and it shows 24 mpg which I was pleasantly surprised by. Little city majority highway all flat land

gf2020 Enthusiast

gf2020

Posted
Posted

Just got my RST 3.0 last week and already have nearly 500 miles.  First lengthy drive was all highway from Mass to Maine on Monday, cruise control set at 7 over, so 72 or 77 MPH depending.  Trip computer showed 25.6 MPG, which I thought was pretty good for a brand new engine but I topped it off and hand calculated was even better: 249 miles / 9.2 gallons = 27 MPG.

 

tonto340 Enthusiast

tonto340

Posted
Posted

I recently completed two more trips from SW Virginia to Maryland and got 28 and 29 MPG. I'm satisfied with that.

Duramax3oh Enthusiast

Duramax3oh

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, gf2020 said:

Just got my RST 3.0 last week and already have nearly 500 miles.  First lengthy drive was all highway from Mass to Maine on Monday, cruise control set at 7 over, so 72 or 77 MPH depending.  Trip computer showed 25.6 MPG, which I thought was pretty good for a brand new engine but I topped it off and hand calculated was even better: 249 miles / 9.2 gallons = 27 MPG.

 

Awesome! Welcome to the 3.0 family. I don't hand calculate often, but everytime I do it has been better than what the DIC indicates. Not staggering by any means but a little higher which is great

  • Like 1
redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Duramax3oh said:

Awesome! Welcome to the 3.0 family. I don't hand calculate often, but everytime I do it has been better than what the DIC indicates. Not staggering by any means but a little higher which is great

I've noticed that from many of those that have reported DIC vs hand calc for the 3.0L.

swervin36 Enthusiast

swervin36

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, Duramax3oh said:

Awesome! Welcome to the 3.0 family. I don't hand calculate often, but everytime I do it has been better than what the DIC indicates. Not staggering by any means but a little higher which is great

It was the opposite with my 18 5.3.  The DIC always showed about .5 - 1 mile better than the hand cal.

 

mikedege Enthusiast

mikedege

Posted
Posted

I  just went on a 500 mile round trip, and averaged 26.4 for the whole trip in my 3.0L 4x4, with 5 peeps in the truck and cruise set on 79mph most of the time. 

I was pretty happy, my last 2015 6.2L 4x4 averaged between 21-22 mph to the same destination. Very happy with the baby D-max!!!

 

Mike

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 2,187 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...