Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It’s interesting to me all the complaining with the interior. I’ve got the 8” screen and while the analog buttons seem a bit out of place, the interior is light years better than my last 3 trucks.

I guess it’s all relative. We’re officially in a time where a truck is measured by unlock buttons and screen size.

Loving my ‘19 Sierra


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, Anakalypto said:

It’s interesting to me all the complaining with the interior. I’ve got the 8” screen and while the analog buttons seem a bit out of place, the interior is light years better than my last 3 trucks.

I guess it’s all relative. We’re officially in a time where a truck is measured by unlock buttons and screen size.

Loving my ‘19 Sierra


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where GM has earned the complaints for screen size is in how they trimmed the center stack. They converge the lines in the whole stock right around the screen. It just makes it APPEAR smaller than it really is, thus making it look cheaper and less impressive. 
 

Any objective person who spends time in the new GM interior will almost always give it a thumbs up, even if unenthusiastically. It really works well. But it just looks measly. And looks / perceptions very much matter in a competitive market with fickle buyers. 

Posted
Where GM has earned the complaints for screen size is in how they trimmed the center stack. They converge the lines in the whole stock right around the screen. It just makes it APPEAR smaller than it really is, thus making it look cheaper and less impressive. 
 
Any objective person who spends time in the new GM interior will almost always give it a thumbs up, even if unenthusiastically. It really works well. But it just looks measly. And looks / perceptions very much matter in a competitive market with fickle buyers. 

I get it. My 85 GMC had power windows, which was cool. Had a stacked carburetor too, sweet lines. [emoji16] All modern trucks are pretty nice. You’re right though, the truck consumer market is much more broad and dynamic these days. These nuances seem to be an arms race, not sure where it ends, but neat to watch.

In the mean time I’ll keep building out this ‘19 6.2 SLT like it’s 1985 lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Weren't the 2014-2015 Silverado headlights really lousy? 

I came from a ram. Those were lousy but i still drove and survived


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Just saw this: https://www.gm-trucks.com/spy-shots-2022-chevy-silverado-and-gmc-sierra-convoy-caught/ 

 

Looks, to me, like GM is moving back to projector style bulbs in the headlamp assemblies. Also changing up the DRL look to look more like the DRL on the outgoing SUVs. 

 

To me, those would both be steps backwards. The 19-21 LED DRLs and headlamps are EXCELLENT. Way better than the 16-18 projector style headlamps. 

Posted
2 hours ago, econometrics said:

Just saw this: https://www.gm-trucks.com/spy-shots-2022-chevy-silverado-and-gmc-sierra-convoy-caught/ 

 

Looks, to me, like GM is moving back to projector style bulbs in the headlamp assemblies. Also changing up the DRL look to look more like the DRL on the outgoing SUVs. 

 

To me, those would both be steps backwards. The 19-21 LED DRLs and headlamps are EXCELLENT. Way better than the 16-18 projector style headlamps. 

GM Authority refers to them as “placeholder” headlights so they probably aren’t production parts.

 

CE2CB1FD-0E9D-4602-9A3E-D3374A3347BF.thumb.jpeg.986eb2a7d0d224ec97903f19cebfbebc.jpeg

Posted
19 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

GM Authority refers to them as “placeholder” headlights so they probably aren’t production parts.

 

CE2CB1FD-0E9D-4602-9A3E-D3374A3347BF.thumb.jpeg.986eb2a7d0d224ec97903f19cebfbebc.jpeg

I missed that. Good news. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,959
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Matt Parker
    Newest Member
    Matt Parker
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 878 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...