Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Whats up guys, new to the truck life, just picked up at 2017 Silverado LT 5.3 it came with 24s and i believe its a 4/6 or a 5/7 drop. But the ride is terrible. Need help, i read some forums on here about belltech or belstein but everyone who recommended them said “i think they are better” or “its a bit nicer” nothing too convincing. Please only recommend something you truly like or love. Also, has anyone tried putting the QA1 shocks from older GM trucks into their new one? People swear by those QA1’s! 

86034B95-D964-4134-83C8-18B281C3FE70.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Welcome to the forum. The 24" rims and little skinny tires are probably causing most of the harsh ride. The taller the sidewall the nicer it will ride. I have 11000 km on my Belltech Street Performance shocks, and absolutely love the ride. It's better than stock. I would try their Street Performance shocks, or they have the Nitro Drop shocks for a little softer ride. I remember reading somewhere that the Nitro's are better for the Reg Cabs. There are also a few manufacturers making softer coil springs for our trucks, as well as custom leaf spring packs too.

 

BTW, your truck is sexy!

Posted

Welcome. I personally like mcgaughys. Coil overs I heard are a lot better but also a lot more expensive. Here’s my truck with Mcgaughys 

911C02B5-0B07-4E64-85FB-3A639EC8FDE0.jpeg

Posted

Here's my truck with the Mcgaughys kit #34270. First picture is at 4/7 and second at 3/6. Rides like a dream, it probably rides better than stock. I have a buddy who had a IHC kit and the ride was not pleasant, he also swapped out that kit for a Mcgaughys.1422d0a65191e9a58031152d6323c34e.jpgc8fe4bec411d74c2f9850c6e47220ed5.jpg

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks guys!!! I also have a buddy who has an 04 sierra with qa1s and he recommended seeing if those will fit this year trucks. Do you guys think they will? I have everyone with older trucks swearing by the QA1s

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
Thanks guys!!! I also have a buddy who has an 04 sierra with qa1s and he recommended seeing if those will fit this year trucks. Do you guys think they will? I have everyone with older trucks swearing by the QA1s

Just measure the length and order away. I ordered a set of Belltech Nitro Drop shocks for a C10 and they fit. Might have to use some fender washers on the top mount, but should work fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

With lowering a single cab you have to keep in mind that even the best parts out there are all going to be intended for a 4 door because that is the vast majority out on the road.What parts you should use really depend on your use of the truck and how soft you can make the ride before it effects your use of the truck as a truck.If you use your truck for heavy work duty and riding around mostly loaded up its a little easier to make the ride tolerable even with sporty shocks meant for a 4door but if you ride around with an empty bed, on skinny tires, low on fuel, and with the spare tire out its going to ride like its on the rims.Every single cab ive had has been a little different and took a little playing around with parts before I was happy with the compromise in ride.Check out this thread as it might help :

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...