Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 2018 Sierra with 40k miles vibrates between 60 and 65 mph. I have had it balanced twice and aligned but it hasn't helped.  Can anyone shed some light on what may be going on?

Posted
2 minutes ago, rossgonyer said:

My 2018 Sierra with 40k miles vibrates between 60 and 65 mph. I have had it balanced twice and aligned but it hasn't helped.  Can anyone shed some light on what may be going on?

8 speed?

Posted

it might be the freeways  your driving on. the long wheelbase syncs up with the ripples and waves. = high speed vibration.  

try going to a smog station dydno and get it up to 80mph  slowly. this will confirm the road surface is the variable

Posted
4 hours ago, rossgonyer said:

My 2018 Sierra with 40k miles vibrates between 60 and 65 mph. I have had it balanced twice and aligned but it hasn't helped.  Can anyone shed some light on what may be going on?

Has it done this from new or just recently started? 

Posted
18 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Has it done this from new or just recently started? 

Yea, bout what I thought. 

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, rossgonyer said:

Fairly recently.  Im guessing that its in the transmission.

I had the same issue start to vibrate at 75mph on most freeways. then I took a trip out to my local dry lake bed, its smooth as glass.... did three passes until I hit rev limiter or speed limiter. not a single bad vibration at all! it was amazingly smooth.  so that experiment put to rest any driveline vibrations for me. I recommend going to a dyno shop and try it for yourself.

Edited by flyingfool
Posted

What tires do you have on there?  I know a lot of guys have had luck with changing tires or getting a road force balance (myself included).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...