Jump to content

Heavy Duty Front Spring for Travel Trailer?

ARM3

By ARM3
in 2020-2026 Silverado HD & Sierra HD

 Share

Recommended Posts

6.6HD Enthusiast

6.6HD

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, MTU Alum said:

Cranking the torsion bars doesn't change the spring rate, only the check height so that won't change your ride.

 

I'm not sure the model and tire you are running.  If you have a 18 or 20 inch tire, snow plow prep will bump up your front spring rate two steps (three on reg cabs) and you get the diesel front shock.  If you have 17 inch tires you get the same suspension changes but also about 10 to 15 psi tire pressure increase.  

 

I haven't rode any bilstein shocks before.  A shock can only do so much with higher spring rate.  The higher spring rate not allow you to use full length of travel in compression due to you not having enough mass for that spring rate.

 

I probably would look at a torsion bar change first.  You would have to realign vehicle after the tbar change.  This would lower your FGAWR to 4400 or 4800 lbs from 5600lbs as well.

 

#iworkforGM 

 

I have 18's.  Crew cab.  Any idea on part number for the torsion bars I would need?

 

Maybe I will just mount a couple hundred pounds in iron blocks under the front bumper!  LOL

Stand By Enthusiast

Stand By

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, 6.6HD said:

I have 18's.  Crew cab.  Any idea on part number for the torsion bars I would need?

 

Maybe I will just mount a couple hundred pounds in iron blocks under the front bumper!  LOL

Put a winch bumper on it. 

I have a gas crew cab with plow prep. Rides not as bad as I thought, but plan on bilsteins after a court priority add ons.

  • 2 months later...
Steph 6.6 HD gas Enthusiast

Steph 6.6 HD gas

Posted
Posted

Hi Everyone,

I also have the same front stiffness issue on my Chevy Crew 2020 HD 6.6 gas with plow prep. I don'plow.I only tow a 27' toy hauler. Dealer cant tell me what part number i would need to change them to a standard torsion rate. My right side torsion PN #84745487 and the torsion key PN #84634344. Not sure if the bump-stops  are different . mine are PN# 20781438 . I forgot the left side#. need to crawl back under tomorrow.

 

 

Any insight would help.

Steph

MidwestKevin New Member

MidwestKevin

Posted
Posted

Hello

I have the same 6.6 gas with snow plow prep. 21 HD Denali. Do we need to change the torsion bars and the springs?

Any idea on cost? Has anyone done it and did it make much different in the ride?

 

Thanks

MWK

GMC4Zee Enthusiast

GMC4Zee

Posted
Posted

Dam, let the salesman talk me into getting the camper/snow plow prep package and now I may regret that decision. I plan on going with fox 2.0 shocks but may have to look into the Cognito comfort torsion bars. I tow a 12K 5th wheel. Will have to see how it rides when I get delivery in 3 weeks. Getting a '21 GMC 3500 AT4.

 

MTU Alum Enthusiast

MTU Alum

Posted
Posted

You should only order the camper package with pickup campers.  You need the higher front GAWR for pickup campers and the higher spring rates for roll.  On diesels, the torsion bar only goes up one size whereas on gas trucks it's two to three sizes.

 

I wouldn't recommend cognito setup.  GM has five different torsion bar rates and there is no way you can replace with one rate like cognito does.  It will probably ride nice but, you could have some handling or roll issues due lack of spring rate.

 

#iworkforGM 

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
FLDawg Enthusiast

FLDawg

Posted
Posted

Does choosing Z71 suspension over over base Z85 suspension increase front spring rate or FGAWR?

Regards to a 2500hd, 2020+

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

No. Only the shocks are different.  The torsion springs for the truck and the FGAWR are set based on the basic truck configuration, then there are two options - heavy duty camper springs (400 lbs higher FGAWR), and plow pkg (400 to 1200 lbs higher FGAWR depending on base configuration). 
 

For my 3500 cclb srw gas, for example, base FGAWR is 5200. I ordered camper springs, which are 5600, and plow package for my truck would be 6000. After a year of driving it I have decided I don’t need the camper springs for my lightweight popup truck camper, which it turns out only adds 100 lbs of load to the front axle, so I just ordered the 5200 torsion bars to modify it back to the base configuration for a little better ride.  I’ll post on how the mod goes in a few weeks. I’m going to get the Autozone loaner torsion bar tool and try it this weekend to make sure it’s the right one for the new trucks. Reviews say it is the right one. 

  • Like 1
sheath Enthusiast

sheath

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've noticed with the VYU Option, when pulling the 5th wheel (14,300 lbs with about 2,400lbs on the pin) that the front end rides pretty high, and the steering is light / less responsive.  Thinking it is most likely higher than it would be with the standard suspension.   I'd venture to guess it would be even more pronounced with a hitch pull trailer, unless the weight distribution bars are cranked down tight.

Just something to consider. 

I'm adding a front hitch, and plan to carry some weight up there to help settle the front end when pulling the 5th wheel.

 

Truck is a CC/SB 3500HD Gas engine. 

Hope this info is helpful.

 

Truck-&-Trailer-Hooked-Up.jpg

Edited by sheath
add picture
  • 2 weeks later...
Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted
On 3/26/2021 at 4:01 PM, MidwestKevin said:

Hello

I have the same 6.6 gas with snow plow prep. 21 HD Denali. Do we need to change the torsion bars and the springs?

Any idea on cost? Has anyone done it and did it make much different in the ride?

 

Thanks

MWK

I just changed my torsion springs from the original heavy duty camper springs I ordered (5600 FGAWR) to the base springs for my model (5200 FGAWR).  I posted a detailed description of the job in the mods subforum. Bottom line it was surprisingly easy, took me 2.5 hours (now that I’ve done it once I could do it again in 90 minutes), and the two new springs cost about $520 shipped plus whatever tax applies.  Autozone loans the special tool you need. See my post for the tool number. 
 

The ride is noticeably a little better, but the big difference is when I go over speed bumps and other large dips and bumps. It’s definitely softer, which is what I wanted. I would imagine going from the 6000 FGAWR bars to the 5200 bars would be a very noticeable improvement in ride with no plow attached. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,872 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...