Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Buy a can of Daubert Nox-Rust (same as the factory coating) and touch up a few times a year. Entering my third salty WI winter and my frame is still looking great. All you can really do is try to keep up with it and slow it down. Every time the truck is on a lift, the pads wear off the frame coating so I touch up those places and then hit the edges of body mounts where the coating was thin. It’s all superficial anyway.

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, Daly said:

All your post tells me is that with out a little preventative maintenance, a truck that could last a long time, only lasted 14-16 years. And thats not a good time frame in my mind, thats actually pretty bad. 

In 2015 I bought a 1991 C2500, that had been religiously undercoated since day one, off of the second owner (the first owners son). This was an Ontario truck and was daily driven year round. The frame was perfect and rust free, it had the original fuel and brake line, no rust on the body, even the bushings were original. That's 29 years with no sign of "I might get 2 more years out of it". 

Just because it's a snow belt truck doesn't mean it has to have a limited life span. 

To go on a tangent here, what exactly are you using?  I ask because I have had undercoatings on other vehicles and they look pretty until you put it on a lift and realize everything under the coating has rotted away and the vehicle is essentially held together by what's left of the frame and undercoating.  Could poke a finger right through

Posted

All your post tells me is, we have a difference in opinions Daly.

Posted (edited)

The 91 was done with Ziebart, not my choice, but I wasn't the original owner. The benefit to Ziebart is (or use to be, not sure if it's still the same) if you have it done from when the vehicle is new and have it touched up by them every year, then they fix any rust that happens. They stood behind their product, again not the product I prefer and I'm not sure if the still offer that kind of warranty. 

On my new trucks I've used Krown. My ATV is done with Krown every year and it has no rust. I use my ATV to push snow all winter. My dad's 2004 2500HD was done with Krown every other year and it's in the same shape as my old 91. Except he's had to replace the  brake lines, but 99-06 trucks are notorious for brake lines rotting. 

Edited by Daly
Posted

That video is why I don't like Ziebart, it's a rubber based product. It has to be maintained, if not it will rot from underneath. 

Once I bought the 91, I cleaned a lot of it offhand the frame was good, but I resprayed with Krown. You should use an oil based product not a rubberized product. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Daly said:

The 91 was done with Ziebart, not my choice, but I wasn't the original owner. The benefit to Ziebart is (or use to be, not sure if it's still the same) if you have it done from when the vehicle is new and have it touched up by them every year, then the fix any rust that happens. They stood behind their product, again not the product I prefer and I'm not sure if the still offer that kind of warranty. 

On my new trucks I've used Krown. My ATV is done with Krown every year and it has now rust. I use my ATV to push snow all winter. My dad's 2004 2500HD was done with Krown every other year and it's in the same shape as my old 91. Except he's had to replace the  brake lines, but 99-06 trucks are notorious for brake lines rotting. 

Krown does seem to be a much better product.  It's not just an inch thick coating of tar.  Will do more research.. thanks!

Posted

I should make an undercoating how-to thread.  I use this stuff: https://www.theruststore.com/Cortec-VpCI-368D-P83.aspx

 

I buy the 5-gallon pail & use a fluid film gun w/attachments.  Pull the wheel liners, body plugs, skid shields, tail lamps, spare tire, etc.  Get the truck on jackstands, pull the wheels & tires, put on some old clothes, respirator, dustmask &  go to town with the stuff.

 

I probably have 16 hours into the job, but it is well worth it.

 

 

Posted

Heh.. ironically enough, the guy making the anti-Ziebart video, made a video about a Krown-like product
 

 

Posted

The science is...Iron, water, oxygen.

Remove one of these and there is no rust.

Anything past this is marketing. 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

The science is...Iron, water, oxygen.

Remove one of these and there is no rust.

Anything past this is marketing. 

Correct, but some products work better than others.  Some will allow a tiny bit of water in, and never let it out (eg Ziebart and the like).  Suppose that is what I am trying to find out.  Which will block out water and salt/other ingredients the speed up electrolysis and/or burn through the finish that you've applied.

In the end, the OP was concerned about a little rust and I personally would like to prevent it as long as I can, as inexpensively as I can :) 

Edited by Rob Mugs
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

Correct, but some products work better than others.  Some will allow a tiny bit of water in, and never let it out (eg Ziebart and the like).  Suppose that is what I am trying to find out.  Which will block out water and salt/other ingredients the speed up electrolysis and/or burn through the finish that you've applied.

In the end, the OP was concerned about a little rust and I personally would like to prevent it as long as I can, as inexpensively as I can :) 

Most product failures are application failures and most of those failures to understand that you can't apply preventatives like Ziebart over wet metal AND it must be maintained. Once upon a time Ziebart would not even touch a car that was not squeaky fresh new right from the dealership. They all will take your money now. 

 

Single stage Rust controls either displace or seal.  Some surfaces flex and some don't. Each has it's own methods and materials. People in general want the benefits without the effort and inconvenience. They don't like oil because it collects dust. They don't like wax because under stress it cracks. They don't like most because they require maintenance. Ziebart requires maintenance. Annual maintenance. Don't do it and you get stories about how it lets water in. Yes it does. Just like a scratch in you paint compromises it's rust preventive effectiveness. 

 

But what they ALL do like is rust free.

Pick a poison. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Most product failures are application failures and most of those failures to understand that you can't apply preventatives like Ziebart over wet metal AND it must be maintained. Once upon a time Ziebart would not even touch a car that was not squeaky fresh new right from the dealership. They all will take your money now. 

 

Single stage Rust controls either displace or seal.  Some surfaces flex and some don't. Each has it's own methods and materials. People in general want the benefits without the effort and inconvenience. They don't like oil because it collects dust. They don't like wax because under stress it cracks. They don't like most because they require maintenance. Ziebart requires maintenance. Annual maintenance. Don't do it and you get stories about how it lets water in. Yes it does. Just like a scratch in you paint compromises it's rust preventive effectiveness. 

 

But what they ALL do like is rust free.

Pick a poison. 

 

 

I've had Ziebart and "Rusty Jones" and neither were worth the gas I spent bringing the cars in with.  Areas coated rotted faster than those that weren't.  These were on an 81 K5 and 85 Trans Am with Rusty Jones/Ziebart 

 

Both were done on brand new cars just after leaving the dealer.  (Had to think back there.. been awhile) :)  Both ended up with replaced panels  that rotted but it was an uphill battle and they never matched the paint properly.....

To each their own, I wouldn't put that stuff on anything 

Edited by Rob Mugs
Posted

Just need to wash the damn thing once in awhile and keep up on maintenance. Why spray a bunch of junk on the frame that’s going to react with the factory coating and make a huge mess. Again, entering my third winter of salt and brine here. You can see where I touched up around the lift pads last month but that’s it. If you didn’t know better you’d think it’s new off the lot.

 

BAB6AB20-D3DE-4E8C-AEF7-FED855F6687C.thumb.jpeg.fa5a10289ff4e3274da732375d635039.jpeg699A48F1-147D-41B5-B521-44A7D1401A90.thumb.jpeg.1e9bd70a68bc2707425aae71150ffd7f.jpegB68A749D-AFE3-482F-807F-78E7CAB197BE.thumb.jpeg.2dc03159497bfbf5c4cd20eabf7e70f9.jpeg7D69A42F-2463-43C3-97B7-1C62D0BFD0A0.thumb.jpeg.902509dbf37938bd6840a44362fdddd3.jpeg


As someone else said, I’m pretty sure even if you do nothing, the frame will outlive the truck. As I see it, these aren’t gonna be much fun to own 10 years from now anyway. Fancy brake by wire system alongside all the other aging electronics, a transmission they didn’t even bother giving you a dipstick for, and DFM (which is still somewhat unproven, especially when you’re talking over 100k miles)...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Fred was in the fertilized egg business. He had several hundred young pullets, and ten roosters to fertilize the eggs He kept records, and any rooster not performing went into the soup pot and was replaced. This took a lot of time, so he bought some tiny bells and attached them to his roosters. Each bell had a different tone, so he could tell from a distance, which rooster was performing. Now, he could sit on the porch and fill out an efficiency report by just listening to the bells. Fred's favourite rooster, old Butch, was a very fine specimen, but this morning he noticed old Butch's bell hadn't rung at all! When he went to investigate, he saw the other roosters were busy chasing pullets, bells-a-ringing, but the pullets, hearing the roosters coming, would run for cover. To Fred's amazement, old Butch had his bell in his beak, so it couldn't ring. He'd sneak up on a pullet, do his job and walk on to the next one. Fred was so proud of old Butch, he entered him in the City Show and he became an overnight sensation among the judges. The result was the judges not only awarded old Butch the "No Bell Piece Prize," but they also awarded him the "Pulletsurprise" as well. Clearly old Butch was a politician in the making. Who else but a politician could figure out how to win two of the most coveted awards on our planet by being the best at sneaking up on the unsuspecting populace and screwing them when they weren't paying attention. Vote carefully in the next election, you can't always hear the bells.
    • Can someone confirm if the GM order workbench terminal is able to validate a custom build sequence:   1) Initialize the Allocation Base: Open a new vehicle build queue, select the 2026 Chevrolet Suburban 4WD, and pick the High Country (3LZ Preferred Equipment Group).   2) Select the Diesel Powertrain: Go directly to the engine configuration screen and choose RPO code LZ0 (3.0L Duramax Turbo-Diesel). Ensure it maps to the MHS 10-speed automatic transmission.   3) Deploy the Seating Swap: Navigate to the Interior Options screen and enter RPO code ATT to replace the standard captain's chairs with the power-release 60/40 bench seat. Because you are not trying to force a separate luxury or air-suspension bundle, the standard, premium D07 Fixed Floor Console remains active. The system will accept this change immediately without triggering a warning message.   3)Apply Heavy-Duty Hauling Capability: Input RPO code NHT (Max Trailering Package). The commercial terminal will automatically bundle the required trailering hardware and software modules to support the diesel engine's maximum towing capacity.   5) Layer the Premium Tech and Glass: Separately add code C3U (Panoramic Power Sunroof) and code UKL (Super Cruise) to the order screen.   6) Run the Final Validation: Click the "Validate Order" button at the bottom of the interface.
    • Spent the last hour or 2 googling and reading up on the spacer thing. I don't like the loss of thread contact on the slip on spacers, but it appears you can get "extended" lug nuts that reach into the hole of the wheel to get back the lost threads. Looks like the only true hubcentric slip on spacers are at least .375". I'd want as little as I could get away with and don't want to cause other clearance issues going any thicker. Bora seems to offer what appears to be a well made .375" spacer and extended lug nuts. I searched here and did find a couple threads recommending Bora. But not cheap. By the time I buy spacers and lugs, new TPMS sensors, then pay a tire shop to install the new sensors, I suspect I'm going to be in over $400. Thinking about running out and getting some washers to put behind the wheel to see if .375" is enough to clear calipers, turn lock to lock without rubbing, and to see if the wheels/tires look strange pushed out a little. This would just be to check fitment.
    • Roadmaster makes some quality parts; I have their sway bar. I considered the RAS, but I ended up bagging. I didn't know what kind of ride I'd get with RAS, and the bags have interior jounce bumpers, so I can run 0 pounds pressure. I figured I'd have the best of normal suspension ride with assist on-demand. But it seems you got pretty much the same in one item.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...