Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You guy realize those Yenko Silverado’s are $80k PLUS the price of the truck that you want to modify. So for my truck is would have been $140k!!!!!  That right there is ludicrous! 

Posted

That’s the price to pay for performance and uniqueness.... I figure my build will be in +/-$100k once I’m done. 
 

GM could build the truck with a LT4/5 and sell it for $79k and make a killing. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Descartian said:

That’s the price to pay for performance and uniqueness.... I figure my build will be in +/-$100k once I’m done. 
 

GM could build the truck with a LT4/5 and sell it for $79k and make a killing. 

I totally agree with you!  I’d sign on the dotted line. But $79k is a hell of a lot cheaper than $140k that my truck would have cost with the Yenko conversion. 
 

it’s awesome you can afford to build your own truck like that. That’s a ton of coin. 

Posted

I did the math back in the day. Bought a regular truck. A 99 Ford sport 5 speed 4.6. The vortec kit was 3800$. My trusted shop installed it. 2 years later and 100K miles of fun I traded it in. Never a problem with it. The add ons that you don’t need are price drivers. I believe the kits are about 6K now. The kind of horse power you’re starting with now plus 5 lbs of boost of a basic kit. No brainer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

IMO

It's about money. The sales of high performance factory trucks would be minimal compared to the overall sales. I'm personally not interested. If I want to go fast I would buy a sports car, not a truck. Or a motorcycle. So I believe GM thinks the market is to small.

Edited by diyer2
Posted
5 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

IMO

It's about money. The sales of high performance factory trucks would be minimal compared to the overall sales. I'm personally not interested. If I want to go fast I would buy a sports car, not a truck. Or a motorcycle. So I believe GM thinks the market is to small.

A. It’s not just overall sales but also developing brand recognition and associating your brand with a higher end product. 
 

B. I’m lucky in that I buy pretty much any car I want. I had my eye on a MB GT-C convertible. Amazing car but I just don’t see myself in it (a tad doush’y and flamboyant).  People won’t know what my truck costs, I like that and it’ll be faster than the GT-C. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

IMO

It's about money. The sales of high performance factory trucks would be minimal compared to the overall sales. I'm personally not interested. If I want to go fast I would buy a sports car, not a truck. Or a motorcycle. So I believe GM thinks the market is to small.

Over 10 years of Ford Raptor sales and now Ram with TRXs would counter that argument from you. I also would argue because not only is Ford bringing back the a raptor for year 11 but also for year 12 bringing a Raptor R model with a supercharged V8. There is a demand for high performance trucks. And not everyone’s cup of tea is a sports car.
Most are 2 seaters and if they do have back seats they are really cramped. If you have a family, it’s tough and they also can’t tow anything. For toys I have a boat and jet skis and when you hit the water it doesn’t hurt as bad a pavement.  A motorcycle in my opinion is a death trap.  I survived one totaled motor cycle crash and will never own one or drive one again. No thanks. 
GM has all the small block heritage and inventory on it’s shelves to produce 2 high performance variant trucks. One sport and one off-road to compete and make a profit in the market. 

Posted

I see raptors all over. There’s two parked at my old business every day. The starting price point on those are a bargain, comparably.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
24 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I see raptors all over.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Same here down in Texas. You want to see some expensive trucks, go out to the oil fields when oil is high. They’d drop $140k in a heartbeat and you’d see a lot of them to boot. 

Posted
Same here down in Texas. You want to see some expensive trucks, go out to the oil fields when oil is high. They’d drop $140k in a heartbeat and you’d see a lot of them to boot. 

I’m in Texas. I worked the oil pipelines for 40 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)

A tiny Ford dealership in Hillsdale Michigan regularly has Baha Raptors, lifted 5.0 Roush supercharged trucks and lowered Roush supercharged “sport” trucks.   Montrose Ford in Akron Ohio regularly sell rcsb 2wd 5.0 Roush supercharged trucks, and they are listed in the low $40k’s.  It’s a good time to be a Ford fan. 

Edited by SILVER SLED
  • Like 1
Posted

If GM just unlocked the L87 (6.2L) computer, the aftermarket would be flooded with performance options.  But since we are reliant on GM, the progress is super F'ing slow! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,978 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...