Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all. I'm looking to get back into a Chevy truck after 2 Rams. The only engine I want is the 6.2 with the 10spd and max tow. We will probably be towing a travel trailer down the road and was looking to see what the payload is on the LTZ and RST trucks. As everyone knows there are zero trucks around to look at so I'm looking for some help. Thanks

Posted

My LTZ max tow 6.2 payload is 1,914 pounds.

 

You can figure a lighter equipped LTZ or RST would be bit higher.

Posted

My max tow LTZ has 1910 lbs of payload.  But you need to look at the yellow driver door jamb sticker of each truck you're interested in in order to get the exact payload capacity of that particular truck.  But the real question is, how much does your trailer weigh fully loaded?  Multiply that amount by 13 percent for a WAG on your tongue weight if it's a travel trailer you're looking to tow.  Too many people try to push the extreme limits of a half ton when they really should be looking at a 3/4 ton or one ton.

Posted
1 hour ago, redwngr said:

Trailer rating for 6.2 max tow crew cab 4wd will be around 11,900

The problem with that figure is it's based on a 10 percent tongue weight.  A travel trailer will be closer to a 13 percent tongue weight, meaning you'll exceed hitch weight limit if you try to tow 11,900 lbs.

Posted
Trailer rating for 6.2 max tow crew cab 4wd will be around 11,900
I thought GM said a RST 6.2 Max Tow crew cab 4wd was 13,300

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
11 hours ago, AlaskaErik said:

My max tow LTZ has 1910 lbs of payload.  But you need to look at the yellow driver door jamb sticker of each truck you're interested in in order to get the exact payload capacity of that particular truck.  But the real question is, how much does your trailer weigh fully loaded?  Multiply that amount by 13 percent for a WAG on your tongue weight if it's a travel trailer you're looking to tow.  Too many people try to push the extreme limits of a half ton when they really should be looking at a 3/4 ton or one ton.

Yes I guess I should have asked for everyone to respond with their door sticker. We are looking at a TT around 5k unload. Thanks

Posted

As far as max payload we don't plan on getting near that. If I can get at least 1900 payload from a LTZ then a RST I would think be just a little higher. This where the Ram falls short but they offer a bigger fuel tank which takes away from their smaller payload a little more.

Posted (edited)

I don’t know why so many people b!tch@ about the small fuel tank??  It’s the perfect size, it keeps weight down, which increases payload and fuel economy. 
So what if you have to stop one more time.  90% or higher who have trucks, have families and it’s a great time to get out, stretch your legs, get a snack and a restroom break. I’ve never found it as a hinderance when driving up I29 going to my lake house
Oh and I would go with an LTZ fully loaded. I like the chrome bumper. My High Country is painted and it’s got a little road rash. My 2018 SLT Sierra had a chrome bumper and it was perfect after 2 harsh winters. Good luck with your decision 

Edited by TNTSilverado
Posted

TNTSilverado I agree about the fuel tank size. Nowadays I like to stop and stretch my retired body haha. I didn't tow with either Ram truck and didn't have the the larger tank. My main thing is getting the highest payload and performance I can get from a 1/2 ton and have a comfy interior without going to a 3/4 ton.

  • Like 1
Posted

I agree with TNT, but for the reasons JJ wants. The LTZ is more comfy. You'll pay more for it, too. LTZ has heated and cooled seats. RST will only have heated seats. LTZ has factory navigation and Android Auto/Apple Carplay. RST will only have Android Auto/Apple Carplay. There are a few other creature comforts the LTZ has. It all depends on what you want and how much you're willing to spend.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Transient said:

I thought GM said a RST 6.2 Max Tow crew cab 4wd was 13,300

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

The only one in the chart that shows 13,300 is on the 6.2  DC 4wd with NHT (CK10753)

Requires 20" wheels.  When equipped with 18: wheels the rating of the CK10753 drops to 12,100. 

 

Chart ignores trim level truck weight differences.

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted

Payload and towing will depend on configuration and options. My RST has a crew cab, 6.5 bed, 6.2, 10 speed, max tow. Trailering capacity is 11,900 and payload is 1806. It has the fancy tailgate and moonroof so that's eating up some payload. A couple options that I could do without but its what was available. Coming from a Lariat Ultimate to an RST I do miss some of the creature comforts, but all that comes with a cost. I guess it depends on what you are used to and what options are important. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Transient said:

I agree with TNT, but for the reasons JJ wants. The LTZ is more comfy. You'll pay more for it, too. LTZ has heated and cooled seats. RST will only have heated seats. LTZ has factory navigation and Android Auto/Apple Carplay. RST will only have Android Auto/Apple Carplay. There are a few other creature comforts the LTZ has. It all depends on what you want and how much you're willing to spend.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

My LTZ does not have factory nav.

Posted

Navigation comes in LTZ Convenience Package II, which is also a part of the LTZ Premium Package.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still $3.01 with even more places at this price
    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...