Jump to content

Towing at the limit

nominion
 Share

Recommended Posts

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, dieselfan1 said:

Call it what you want, it's still a half ton.


Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

Yeah, so?

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

JimCost2014
JimCost2014

No, one thing that you can never replace is a life, yours, family, or an innocent victim if things go wrong.   At the limits, your truck will never respond like it does without a load or tra

ic3man5
ic3man5

Amsoil is my choice in everything also. I usually cheap out if I don't plan on running it for a long time or I know the engine will last forever even if you piss in the oil tank. I've actually been ru

diyer2
diyer2

I'm not trying to start an oil debate. And no need to get turn to foul language. According to the testing Rat performed in your link, Amsoil rated number 4 and 5 for wear. That's my point. 

Posted Images

pokismoki Senior Enthusiast

pokismoki

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, swathdiver said:

That is the Maximum Towing Package and in a previous generation, GMT900, came with the 6.2 motor, 3.73 gears and the increased capacity cooling system with an engine oil cooler and external transmission cooler.  It has an extra leaf in the rear spring pack bringing the rear axle rating from 3950 to 4200 pounds.  The K2s are similar though I do not know what gears they used.  Towing capacity is 10,400 to almost 11,000 pounds for the RWD models.  The K2s were rated even higher if memory serves.

any chance the MTP  has a larger radiator than our K2  trucks with 5.3 motors? I find the stock rad is a bit under performing when towing and at WOT not towing

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, pokismoki said:

any chance the MTP  has a larger radiator than our K2  trucks with 5.3 motors? I find the stock rad is a bit under performing when towing and at WOT not towing

According to ACDelco's parts website, yes, the NHT has a different radiator.  It is 21907 versus 21927.  I selected a 2017 with the 6.2 of course.  Don't see dimensions listed there like they have for mine, maybe Rock Auto has them.

 

https://parts-catalog.acdelco.com/catalog/catalog_search.php

 

  • Like 1
asilverblazer Senior Enthusiast

asilverblazer

Posted
Posted

Towing at the limit half a dozen times a year will  never justify the added cost of upgrading trucks. Especially when its an otherwise daily driver.

 

If the limit is 10000 lbs, the limit is 10000 lbs, I'm not going to stop at 5000 lbs to make a bunch of worry warts feel warm and fuzzy.

 

If everything is set up correctly, the weight is distributed correctly, brakes are working sway is minimal... go for it.

  • Like 2
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, pokismoki said:

whats the part number for the larger radiator that drops into our 1500 trucks?

You have a K2 right?  If so, it is 21907.

don67 Enthusiast

don67

Posted
Posted

My 2018 Silverado has the same setup as the OP, and one occasion I've towed at the limit (tractor + float).   

 

Braking was fine, as was handling at speeds below 50mph.  Above 50mph however felt a little squirrely... not something I'd want to do for hours on end.    Especially not with a boxy trailer that catches a lot of sidewind.   7,000 to 8,000 lb is probably the 'comfort limit' for long-distance hauling. 

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 4/6/2021 at 10:56 AM, don67 said:

My 2018 Silverado has the same setup as the OP, and one occasion I've towed at the limit (tractor + float).   

 

Braking was fine, as was handling at speeds below 50mph.  Above 50mph however felt a little squirrely... not something I'd want to do for hours on end.    Especially not with a boxy trailer that catches a lot of sidewind.   7,000 to 8,000 lb is probably the 'comfort limit' for long-distance hauling. 

Was that with a weight distribution hitch or without?

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, don67 said:

Without

Ok, makes sense.  Your generation truck requires a weight distribution hitch for loads over 7,000 pounds and is optional below that.

ic3man5 Enthusiast

ic3man5

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 4/2/2021 at 12:37 PM, asilverblazer said:

Towing at the limit half a dozen times a year will  never justify the added cost of upgrading trucks. Especially when its an otherwise daily driver.

 

If the limit is 10000 lbs, the limit is 10000 lbs, I'm not going to stop at 5000 lbs to make a bunch of worry warts feel warm and fuzzy.

 

If everything is set up correctly, the weight is distributed correctly, brakes are working sway is minimal... go for it.

I can only assume this comment is indirectly directed towards me since I'm the only one that mentioned the divide by half rule; so here comes the information to fill in your ignorance:

 

Tow rating is determined by the following (J2807 Specification):

-0-30 mph in 12 seconds

-0-60 mph in 30 seconds

-40-60 mph in 18 seconds

-must be able to brake from 20 mph to zero in 45 feet with trailer brakes, or 80 feet without.

-needs to be able to maintain understeer as it accelerates on a circular skid pad from 0.1 g to 0.3 g of lateral acceleration.

-needs be able to tow its maximum trailer weight up a specific 11.4-mile uphill stretch of road in Arizona. For this test to be run correctly, it must be at least 100 degrees Fahrenheit outside, and the air conditioning must be on its maximum setting using outside air. The truck must maintain a minimum speed of 40 mph, and it can't throw any error codes or burn any fluids during the test. Grade of test is between 3-7% on the David Dam test.

 

None of this testing really covers real world testing with long distance or long duration travel. The most stressful test only lasts 15.2 minutes (11.4/45=0.2533). What makes this even worse is the Vehicle Warm-up is Optional or not specified in the test. 

 

So now that we have established a baseline we can see that tow limit specification doesn't specifically cover pushing the truck to its limits in all situations. Multiple people have already stated (including myself) the truck CAN NOT successfully tow extended distances at max tow rating without doing damage. Its already an established fact the TCC is weak in the K2 and is ran too hot to begin with. $300 tranny cooler vs $3000-5000 transmission rebuild because you decided to tow your daily driver a couple times a year at the limit; I know which one I'd pick. Sometimes it pays to be a worry wart and feel warm and fuzzy, but that is just me.

 

J2807 specification can be found here for further reading:

https://fifthwheelst.com/documents/tow-test-standards-2016-02.pdf

Edited by ic3man5
  • Like 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

Hummm. A truck can’t tow at maximum limits for extended times without breaking down. I did for 20 years with multiple vehicles for a minimum of 100K miles each. My half tons had max payload from brand new until trade in. My trailers were capable of stopping their load and the truck. Diesels were the primary workhorses. The early gassers were 390s,454s, a couple V-10s. Honestly they all were over max limits. Of course that was until the mid 2000s. Payload and tow loads have increased. I would have been within the new ratings.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ic3man5 Enthusiast

ic3man5

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Hummm. A truck can’t tow at maximum limits for extended times without breaking down. I did for 20 years with multiple vehicles for a minimum of 100K miles each. My half tons had max payload from brand new until trade in. My trailers were capable of stopping their load and the truck. Diesels were the primary workhorses. The early gassers were 390s,454s, a couple V-10s. Honestly the all were over max limits. Of course that was until the mid 2000s. Payload and tow loads have increased. I would have been within the new ratings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Those trucks weren't at the thermal limits and were essentially built better out of mechanical tolerances and limitations. Your truck 20 years ago more than likely had over 100hp/torque less power, bigger block, lighter, worse brakes, etc. I wouldn't say that is a fair comparison as I used to do the same without issue; now with the EPA and push for efficacy we are reaching more limits in the designs. I've seen my fair share of 4L60s be destroyed because of towing.

 

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
 
Those trucks weren't at the thermal limits and were essentially built better out of mechanical tolerances and limitations. Your truck 20 years ago more than likely had over 100hp/torque less power, bigger block, lighter, worse brakes, etc. I wouldn't say that is a fair comparison as I used to do the same without issue; now with the EPA and push for efficacy we are reaching more limits in the designs. I've seen my fair share of 4L60s be destroyed because of towing.
 

My shop see examples of heavy towing daily. Non of my trucks were stock. 0195e6033da8110ef4209a0f2d478081.jpg
I just stopped towing in the mid 2000s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,793 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • B14Sierra
      Cam chain tensioner question

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • dna9656
      No low range 4 x 4

      By dna9656 · Posted

      My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • asilverblazer
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...