Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just looking to see if anyone else is having the problems I am with my automatic highbeams in my 2020 AT4. Since taking delivery of the truck the intellibeam system has been malfunctioning. At first it was all the safety systems including the lane keep, the automatic cruise control and the forward collision detection. After multiple trips to dealer (as always, unable to duplicate problems) they eventually replaced the forward facing camera at the suggestion of a system engineer from GM and that seemed fix all the problems except the intellibeam. The system sometimes will not engage even though all requirements are met. Sometimes it will be on and then just shut itself off randomly then will not turn on anymore during the drive with switch. It will randomly then just reactivate itself and turn on and off with no intervention from me. To be clear, I am not saying the highbeams are turning on and off, I mean the actual intellibeam system as indicated by the headlight symbol with the "A" in it on the DIC. When the system is on, the highbeams most of the time will work 100% as expected activating and deactivating when appropriate, but then will just get locked on and will not shut off the highbeams with approaching vehicles or when someone is in front of me. Sometimes they will cycle on and off and be flashing the highbeams causing people to think i am flashing at them and they pull over. When this is occurring I am unable to turn the system off with the switch. It has been to dealer countless times and they had my truck for 2 weeks once with the shop foreman taking it home and driving it every night and they say they were unable to duplicate it, but the day I picked it up it was doing it so I am not sure why they can not duplicate it. GM engineers have been involved with no luck. I have countless videos of they system malfunctioning and have been told that the videos mean nothing unless it happens when they check the vehicle and are able to catch data with a recorder to find the problem. But they do admit the videos show the system not working as designed. I have read other posts of the same problem and people said the dealer replaced the ambient light sensor on the dash and it was fixed but I replaced the sensor with no change. I have had automatic high been in all 5 of my vehicles since 2007 so I fully understand how they work. If anyone else has had this issue or currently has it please let me know what the fix was/is. At this point I am not even bringing it back to the dealer because they say they are unable to duplicate everytime and its a huge waste of my time and a huge inconvenience. I do report it everytime it is in for other services though. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by G$$Money
Addition
Posted

Since you had the windshield camera replaced, the dealership probably downloaded the latest calibration data for the module. But you should ask to ensure they did. If I remember correctly, once the camera was replaced the tech had to drive the vehicle for a few miles with the computer connected to step thru some procedural steps to calibrate the camera. Then it took a few days for the system to calibrate itself for proper operation. Have them check for proper alignment of the camera.

Posted

It was replaced with the newest model and updated to the latest software provided directly by the GM tech. It was a version the dealer didn't even have access to yet. And it has been calibrated at least 3 times since attempting to correct the issue with no luck. But thanks for the suggestions.

Posted

I had some initial issues with mine where it seemed to be a little late in switching back to low beam with on-coming traffic.  After a few miles it stabilized and seems to react based on speed, ambient light and the presence of vehicles in front.  The way yours is acting seems to me like it's the turn signal switch itself or maybe the module it communicates with.  The system is acting like it's getting commands to turn it on and off?  That comes from the button on the stalk right?  Maybe a ground issue (old style seemed to be full of issues in that way)?  Maybe a BCM? 

 

Not sure about the architecture of this system but it seems like the BCM is the hub...it responds to user inputs and creates outputs.  It responds to sensor inputs and creates similar outputs.  Make sense?  

 

Here's a list of modules I was able to dig up

ECM, BCM, EBCM, SDM, TCM, ECC (HVAC), EPS, HPCM, IPC, and Radio

 

Best of luck

Posted

Here are some of the 20 plus videos of it happening. I believe it is one of the 2 control modules that control the system since the camera and light sensor have been replaced. Doubt it's the multi-function switch as you can see in the videos, sometimes the high beams either don't turn on or off when it should but the intellibeam system does stay activated. The dealer won't replace the control module unless they can duplicate the problem themselves and trace it to a control module.

 

Link to video

Link to another video

Link to yet another video

 

Posted
16 hours ago, G$$Money said:

The dealer won't replace the control module unless they can duplicate the problem themselves and trace it to a control module.

 

 

Maybe you need to start talking to them about the lemon law and returning the truck.  Of course you don’t want to have to actually do that, but maybe they’ll be more inclined to try a few more things like replacing some control modules.

 

Also, before it gets too much further into summer, see if you can get it to happen before the dealer closes on the days they stay open late, drive in there while it’s happening.  That “we can’t duplicate the issue” is BS.  Alternatively, have them give you a truck for a week while they drive yours.  Still a pain, but not too much of an inconvenience as long as you have transportation.

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Lol.. no.. they have replaced every module of the system with no change. They even replaced the camera 3 times. I worked daily directly with a GM field service engineer who took my truck several times. He witnessed the problem and confirmed it was not working right. Even captured data from the system to send to the engineers who designed the system. No resolution yet. After 3 years dealing with it and 32 trips to the dealer , I am trading it in next weekend for a new one. GM gave me a trade in credit to use towards the new vehicle for all of my problems. The engineer was able to find the issue I was having with loss of all the onstar data after remote starting it and theybsaid there is only one other vehicle with the same issue 8n the whole US. My luck! They have written a software update for that using several data downloads from truck and it is in the testing phase now, but by the time it is released I won't have the truck any more. Lol

  • 10 months later...
Posted

I guess you've traded it off by now.  I have a 2021 Silverado 1500 LTZ and I'm having the same issue with the intellibeam switch on turn signal stalk not being able to activate the system.  As well as, sometimes it turns itself off without touching the switch.  Thank God, when I do get it to turn on, the system works correctly and doesn't flash off/on like yours did.  I'm an electronics technologist and I know intermittent issues like this are the hardest to find.  I wish there was a known fix for this problem.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

More than just you and another having this issue. I have the same 2020 AT4. The automatic lights worked intermittently since I bought it. Like you said, when the system is on it works, but the system turns off I have no way to get it back on. The switch does nothing. Didn't happen much at first but they have been off for months now. I've never reported it to the dealership. Going in for an oil change next week. I was hoping they would have an update to fix it but judging from this thread, that's not likely. Maybe I'll trad e it in for one of those new Denali Ultimates. Just got to find $100k I'm not using!

Posted
4 hours ago, Grayson Pippin said:

More than just you and another having this issue. I have the same 2020 AT4. The automatic lights worked intermittently since I bought it. Like you said, when the system is on it works, but the system turns off I have no way to get it back on. The switch does nothing. Didn't happen much at first but they have been off for months now. I've never reported it to the dealership. Going in for an oil change next week. I was hoping they would have an update to fix it but judging from this thread, that's not likely. Maybe I'll trad e it in for one of those new Denali Ultimates. Just got to find $100k I'm not using!


please report back if they find anything!!

Posted

I have a 20 AT4 as well.  One thing I have found with intellibeam is that if you have inclement weather that is causing enough of an issue for the camera behind your windshield then it also seems to impact the auto high beam function.  It could simply be a little bit of condensation build up.  And sometimes it's accompanied with an adaptive cruise disabled message. I can normally wait a few minutes put my defroster on or use the wipers in conjunction with waiting and it often returns to normal.  Good luck.

Posted
28 minutes ago, calgator73 said:

I have a 20 AT4 as well.  One thing I have found with intellibeam is that if you have inclement weather that is causing enough of an issue for the camera behind your windshield then it also seems to impact the auto high beam function.  It could simply be a little bit of condensation build up.  And sometimes it's accompanied with an adaptive cruise disabled message. I can normally wait a few minutes put my defroster on or use the wipers in conjunction with waiting and it often returns to normal.  Good luck.

 

Exactly, if the camera is obstructed by snow or condensation and cannot 'see' it will disable.

Posted

On my '23 if the fog lights are turned on the auto high beams are disabled. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Anyone find a resolution? I have a 2022 Sierra Denali and (of course) right out of warranty and my intellibeam doesn’t always work. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...