Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an opportunity to get a take off set of Ranchos for pretty cheap. I know Billstein 5100s are the gold standard here, but how are the Ranchos compared to the standard black shocks? Any better?

Posted

In my opinion, the Z71 truck I drove for a week rode far worse than the base suspension. Very bouncy and uncontrolled. I wouldn’t waste the time on the Ranchos.

  • Like 1
Posted

i have the original "black" shocks on the front and upgraded the rear to 5100. Made a huge difference with the rear. i will only switch out the front to 5100 but money is a little tight. probably at 90kmiles i will swap both. 

Posted

Can’t imagine the Ranchos are worse than the standard black ones. I have a dealership offering new take offs installed for $150.

Posted (edited)

Bilsteins cost me less than $100 each on Summit. Not that huge of a difference in price assuming you can turn a few screws. Don’t even need a jack to do it. 30 minute job.

33 minutes ago, SilveradoRST said:

Does it matter if they are the Z71 Ranchos vs the Trail Boss/AT4 Ranchos?  

The Trail Boss ones are longer and also monotube. Far better than the normal Z71 shocks.

Edited by OnTheReel
Posted

I have an rst and my stepfather has a Sierra with the black shocks. His drive much better. I changed my rears to bilsteins. Eventually, I’ll do the fronts as well. I hate my ranchos, they are wayyy to bouncy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

ive had both and much prefer base black ac delcos over the twin tube ranchos i have currently in x31.....would be a waste imo to throw them on intentionally

Posted
11 minutes ago, Dunn said:

ive had both and much prefer base black ac delcos over the twin tube ranchos i have currently in x31.....would be a waste imo to throw them on intentionally

Thanks! Good to know! One of these days I’ll throw some money at some billsteins

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
    • Glad you had success with it. I did as well, but about 5-6 months later it returned. Tried again, same result. This was after the dealer made several attempts and never even got it to slow down.
    • 3.15 Kroger’s in Montgomery Tx
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...