Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Have a 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 crew cab 4x4, 5.3L, 6-speed trans, and 91k miles.

Has trailer brake controller, Z-71 pkg, All Terrain pkg,  transmission fluid cooler, high capacity air cleaner, auto locking rear differential, ultrasonic rear park assist, and trailering pkg.

 

Finally paid off truck so I could Afford a 34' Rockwood Travel Trailer, 7450 Lbs, which I purchased and towed home.

 

When I bought the truck used in December of 2015, I was shown a 2014 Owners Manual saying my truck Tow Capacity was 8500 Lbs., but it says 7200 Lbs on the door frame, does anyone know which is Correct?

 

Now I find out my truck has 3.08 gears. SERIOUSLY GM, you put in these Options on a Truck, then Install 3.08 Gears,

What is GM Thinking???

 

Now I have to worry if my truck is capable of towing our travel trailer any distance.

Hey All, looking for your thoughts,

Thank You!

 

Posted

Where does it say on the door frame how much you can tow? Are looking at the gvwr or something?

 

 

You should be referencing this guide.

 

http://letstowthat.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2014-GMC-Trailering-Guide.pdf

 

If you really have 3.08 gears then it sounds like your max trailer weight is 6600lbs.

 

 

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Thank You m3n00b,

I downloaded trailer guide, and took a picture on the trucks door frame.

20210417_112939.jpg

Posted
55 minutes ago, James Beyer said:

Have a 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 crew cab 4x4, 5.3L, 6-speed trans, and 91k miles.

Has trailer brake controller, Z-71 pkg, All Terrain pkg,  transmission fluid cooler, high capacity air cleaner, auto locking rear differential, ultrasonic rear park assist, and trailering pkg.

 

Finally paid off truck so I could Afford a 34' Rockwood Travel Trailer, 7450 Lbs, which I purchased and towed home.

 

When I bought the truck used in December of 2015, I was shown a 2014 Owners Manual saying my truck Tow Capacity was 8500 Lbs., but it says 7200 Lbs on the door frame, does anyone know which is Correct?

 

Now I find out my truck has 3.08 gears. SERIOUSLY GM, you put in these Options on a Truck, then Install 3.08 Gears,

What is GM Thinking???

 

Now I have to worry if my truck is capable of towing our travel trailer any distance.

Hey All, looking for your thoughts,

Thank You!

 

 

11 minutes ago, James Beyer said:

Thank You m3n00b,

I downloaded trailer guide, and took a picture on the trucks door frame.

20210417_112939.jpg

 

 

7200lbs is the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating or GVWR.  That is not the tow rating.  GVWR is the total allowable weight of the truck itself and payload that can't be exceeded.

 

Based on your VIN, yes you do have the standard 3.08 gearing in it.  

 

The owner's manual you saw is incorrect also.  GM had mis-published the tow ratings on trucks with the 3.08 gearing.  The correct tow rating for your truck CK15543 Crew Cab Short Box 4x4 with 5.3 and 3.08 gearing is 6,600lbs.  The Gross Combined Weight Rating or GCWR is 12,000lbs.  That is the total weight of truck and trailer that can't be exceeded.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Something is weird about that door jamb sticker meaning the imported by Bisbee Importing, Inc. I assumed this vehicle was first registered in Canada and you bought it used in Michigan?  The Bisbee Importing website is confusing as it appears they're only into corporate data. I assume you arrived at the 3.08 gear ratio by reading the rpo code on the glove box door?

Edited by garagerog
Posted
Just now, garagerog said:

Something is weird about that door jamb sticker meaning the imported by Bisbee Importing, Inc. I assumed this vehicle was first registered in Canada and you bought it used in Michigan?  The Bisbee Importing website is confusing as it appears their only into corporate data. I assume you arrived at the 3.08 gear ratio by reading the rpo code on the glove box door?

 

His VIN build shows RPO code Z49 Canadian Market so it was indeed an ex Canadian that was imported back as a used truck at some point.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank You Newdude and Garagerog!

So, I have a GM Truck not Capable of Towing the Rockwood that was made for Canada, wow.

And to think I sold my old 72 Ford that could have hauled just about anything, for this GM Truck, what a Shame.

 

Posted
Thank You Newdude and Garagerog!
So, I have a GM Truck not Capable of Towing the Rockwood that was made for Canada, wow.
And to think I sold my old 72 Ford that could have hauled just about anything, for this GM Truck, what a Shame.
 
I would think the dealer you bought the trailer from should have checked to see if your truck can handle it....unless it was private party.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Thanks m3n00b and Everyone,

I bought the trailer from a Private Party knowing that GM said I could tow 8500 pounds with my truck.

 

Not sure what I will do now. 

Not in the position to have another Truck payment and a trailer payment.

 

I bought the trailer because we are now raising 3 Grandchildren and thought Camping would be a good, positive experience from their sad past.

 

But, I Thank You All for your help.

 

Edited by James Beyer
Posted

Just reading through the thread and looked through the pdf on here and just spitballing here but wouldn't the problem be solved by throwing a new set of gears at it? 3.08s to 3.42s or even 3.73s would bump that rating up no? The ratios can be changed by swapping out gears in the front and rear differentials and the rest of the trucks are built the same...

Sent from my SM-G986U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
Just reading through the thread and looked through the pdf on here and just spitballing here but wouldn't the problem be solved by throwing a new set of gears at it? 3.08s to 3.42s or even 3.73s would bump that rating up no? The ratios can be changed by swapping out gears in the front and rear differentials and the rest of the trucks are built the same...

Sent from my SM-G986U1 using Tapatalk


This is a good idea but I'm not sure how the law would interpret this...if they even care.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Posted

Thank You VanguardK2,

That might be a great solution.

I read somewhere that the 5.3L with the 3.42 will tow 9000+, and 5.3L with 3.73 will tow 11,000+.  Not sure the cost, but cheaper than newer truck.

 

Posted

Just a thought and I know you just paid it off but the way the market is right now on trucks you might get a great deal on a trade.   

Posted
Thank You VanguardK2,

That might be a great solution.

I read somewhere that the 5.3L with the 3.42 will tow 9000+, and 5.3L with 3.73 will tow 11,000+.  Not sure the cost, but cheaper than newer truck.

 

Cost here in SoCal is about $2000 to have a shop regear a 4x4.

 

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted

Well a regear is much better than trying to resell and getting something with a bad history or underlying problems due to lack of maintenance.

Regear is the way to go and yeah my 5.3 with 3.42s is rated for 9600.

The law could care less about that because it has no ecological impact for them to legislate against cause its not like removing a muffler (loud noise, disturbing peace or whatever) or removing at catalytic converter (enables emissions).

Regearing is 100 percent legal everywhere in the states. Never saw anything ever against regearing a vehicle. Its legal to do a LOT of mods to any vehicle. Engine swaps, transmission swaps, all sorts of stuff. Just not airbags, cat converters in most states and other safety/emissions stuff.

Hope this helps (I'm a dealership technician)not bragging, just saying if your wondering where I get my info from.

Sent from my SM-G986U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,924
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    KirbyCo
    Newest Member
    KirbyCo
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,482 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I will be doing that for sure, but I need to solve who has/ where I can find a bidirectional scan tool that will support OBD 1.5. I'm kicking myself because I ebay'ed a Snap On MT2500 that I didn't think I'd ever need anymore. D'oh!! I'd rather not buy another, so I'll contact a few local shops to see if they have one and how much they'd want to do the procedure. I'd rather have the ability to do it myself... I wish there was a modern tool that could do it all, but I'd have no idea what to buy.   The theory with the pulled timing is that it mimics a rich condition. The delayed spark causes incomplete burn and the O2 sensor picks up low oxygen levels. That's interpreted as a rich condition so the PCM pulls fuel and that shows up in the deeply negative fuel trims.
    • An ultra wealthy man had the most beautiful daughter. But, there was a problem. Everything she touched would melt in her hands. No matter what, Metal, Wood, Stone. Anything she touched would melt. She could not feed herself. Because of this, men were afraid of her. Nobody would dare marry her. Her father was despaired. What could he do to help his daughter? He consulted doctors, scientists and anybody who could solve this problem. Finally one of them said, "If your daughter touches one thing that does not melt in her hands, she will be cured." He was overjoyed and came up with a plan. The next day, he held a competition. Any man who could bring his daughter an object that would not melt in her hands would be given billions of dollars to marry her. Three extremely intelligent and handsome young men took up the challenge. The first brought a very heavy steel rod, But alas, when the she touched it, it completely melted in a matter of seconds. He sadly went away. The second brought a beautiful diamond, knowing diamonds were one of the hardest substance in the world and would not melt. But alas, once she held it in her hand, it melted. He too was sent away disappointed. So now, there was one left He was very nervous & sweating. He approached the daughter & said, “put your hand in my pants pocket and feel what is in there." She did exactly what he asked. She felt something very hard. She held it in her hand, squeezing it as hard as she could. It did not melt & remained extremely hard. Her father was overjoyed. Everybody was overjoyed. She was finally cured. Nothing never, ever melted in her hand again. They married and they both lived happily ever after, raising a wonderful family. Question: What was in the the groom’s pants pocket??? Answer below ↓ M&Ms of course! They melt in your mouth, not in your hand. What on earth were you thinking?
    • There's a bunch of tea leaves that you've read, but in any case the delayed timing is unusual. Not sure how that relates to the rich at idle vs. 'normal' while driving.   If you're in this deep, might be worth investigating, and re-learning the sensor. What have you got to lose? Plus, it properly fixes the timing cover leak.
    • The only problem I have seen this cause is longer crank times. 
    • Injector is being sent off today for rebuild and I estimate I'll have it back in 10 days or so.   It may not be the injector...of course...now that I've torn down the intake again. But, let's rule out the injector and replace those spider legs that have been almost rubbed through.   The truck has always had negative timing and I'm reading "normal" timing at warm idle should be +16 or so. I'm negative 16 to 25 or more, and it's always been like that since I bought it.   A light turned on upstairs last night in the old noggin. Rare, I know...   This will be wild, if it turns out to be the cause!   In 2001, according to the old service documentation, the muffler was replaced. Why? I have no idea, it wouldn't have been rusted through by then. But they did a crappy job.   In 2019, another shop replaced it and noted the prior install was poorly done on the work order. "Exhaust system vibrates on crossmember". Except...I guess they just left it be? I believe the husband, the couple who were original owners, had passed by then. Maybe she said it's just not worth it to have the exhaust system fixed and declined repairs. Very few miles were driven between 2019 and 2025.   The exhaust system vibrates heavily on the crossmember and you can feel it and REALLY hear it, even today. Not always, but at idle, it gets going pretty good sometimes.   What if....   ....What if that's enough to trigger one or both of the knock sensors? Could it be tricking the sensors into sensing knock, so it's pulling timing aggressively? Pulling timing heavily means it's firing after the piston reaches full height which means incomplete burn which means the O2 sensor is sensing a rich condition, which means I've been chasing my tail, and what I thought was an inconsequential problem (janky exhaust) has been THE issue for this truck for 25 solid years?   That would be wild. Maybe it IS wild.   The service documentation thereafter, for years, shows visits for rough idle, replacing O2's, replacing the cat, replacing plugs and wires, a misfire condition, like they could never solve the issue. The injector has been replaced 4 times in 80k miles, that's just crazy.   The secondary theory....   The engine has clearly had a leak at the front seal for a very long time (the greasy trench...). I think the truck changed hands quickly ~2025 because there's Napa receipts from someone I don't recognize in the ownership history. They apparently replaced the timing cover seal, and they did a terrible job. There's RTV smeared all over and the leak I had reduced to a weep by snugging the front oil pan bolts is now a leak again.   HOWEVER....I read about replacing the crankshaft position sensor. Any time the ckp sensor is disturbed or timing cover is removed, the truck requires relearning, and that can only be done through a bi-directional scan tool. Skippy with the RTV probably didn't do the relearn procedure is my guess. His scan tool is lost in a pile of RTV goo somewhere.   So, it's very possible the sensor has been disturbed and the truck is just running on the old learn data but not setting a code for anything. The distributor has since been replaced and so has the camshaft position sensor, so all bets are off for that thing.   In the theme of one step forward, two steps back, I returned the accumulator for the AC. The gal I've been working with at O'Really's has been great. She refunded it under manufacturer's defect and we compared it to the replacement I ordered, and sure enough, the replacement is machined very differently (and a gauge actually fits on it!).   Got it home, installed it, started vacuuming it down.... and I couldn't get good vacuum.   The high side service port, where I replaced the old GM ball valve suspecting that was a source of the previous leak....well, I've clearly exposed whatever pre-existing crack in the line where the service port is welded, and made it much worse. Blessing in disguise? Except there goes another $25, now I'm waiting for a replacement AC line.   In 10-ish days ALL the parts will be here. Rebuilt injector, new exhaust system, new cat, new high pressure AC line.   Oh, did I mention the squeaking ISN'T coming from the AC pump? The truck still squeaks when started, and there were words after I started it with the new AC pump installed. But, there was more to replacing the AC pump for just a squeak. A truck with good working AC is something of value, for the comfort alone.   I've ordered a new harmonic balancer because, 30 years is a good run for one of those. Rule it out. The squeak may be something more sinister, though. I'm worried about that ckp sensor and if it was shimmed correctly, or if the timing set was installed correctly. The squeak may be coming from UNDER the timing cover.   At this point, once I get it put back together, I'm thinking I'll take a 50 mile victory lap and then promptly put it up for sale. This truck is cursed. Betty, from beyond the grave, doesn't want anyone messing with her Blazer. Or maybe she's getting revenge for 30 years of shop visits with that thing.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...