Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello y'all! Here's some info... I own a 2018 Silverado with 8" touch screen and use a Samsung S8 phone. When using navigation weather it be Google Maps or Waze my screen jumps around. Jumps ahead, to the far left and far right. It also stutters. It doesn't always do it but does it enough. It's very frustrating to say the least. Has anyone else had this issue and were you able to fix it? If so how? I'm at the end of my rope here.

Posted

I had exact problem with my Galaxy Note 8. It worked fine when I first got it but then began doing the same thing. I could sometimes toggle location and it would help for a little while but would end up doing it again. I complained on Android Auto forum and they blamed Samsung and Chevy. I complained on Samsung forum and they blamed Chevy and Waze. I complained on Waze forums and they blamed Android Auto. And IIRC, Chevy blamed both of them. I never did get it fixed. The only thing that worked was getting rid of the Note 8 and upgrading. I know have a Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5g and it pretty much solved the problem. I will occasionally get freezes but few and far between. One suggestion you could try is to uninstall Android Auto and Waze, restart the phone and install fresh copies of each. If that doesn't work, you may have to upgrade or go with a different brand. The problem did seem to happen a lot with the Samsung Galaxy S8 and the Note 8 for some reason...

Posted (edited)

I really hate to be "that person" aka Apple fan boy, but my iPhone, even running the IOS 15 Beta (I'm a developer), the only issue I've had is connectivity, on occasion, wherein the infotainment screen is still looking for the phone after plugging in the USB.
A simple unplug and replug always connects it.
I wish I had more experience with Android to help but this is all I can add ... sorry. :(

Edited by MikeBMW
Posted
5 hours ago, CrawlSlow said:

Try different cable, try different phone, if all fails try reprogram the HMI.

For whatever reason, Samsung Galaxy S8 phones as well as the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 like I had were known for problems with Android Auto. I dealt with it for a while and discovered that there were many others in the same boat. There was a lot of fingerpointing from all sides but no one seemed to want to or be able to solve it. The only solution I found was switching to a newer phone. And I am still using the same USB-C cable that I was originally using on my Note 8 on my Note 20 and it works just fine. 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, CrawlSlow said:

For note 8 or s8, enable developers mode and change usb type to MDI as default and see if that helps. If not, just use your note 20. 

I actually enable Developer Mode on all my phones as one of the first things I do after getting it. I went through all of that including even opening developer mode inside of Android Auto after the AA folks had me do it. That can be done by opening Android Auto on your phone, going into AA settings, tap on version info 10 times and then switching developer mode on and off by clicking on the 3 dots in upper right while in AA settings. Like I mentioned, for S8 and Note 8, it's a known problem that none of the involved parties including Android Auto, Waze, Samsung, or Chevrolet seem to be able to or want to solve. And now that both the S8 and Note 8 are basically obsolete, I think it's pretty much going to be ignored. 

Edited by mikeyk101
Posted
10 hours ago, mikeyk101 said:

For whatever reason, Samsung Galaxy S8 phones as well as the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 like I had were known for problems with Android Auto. I dealt with it for a while and discovered that there were many others in the same boat. There was a lot of fingerpointing from all sides but no one seemed to want to or be able to solve it. The only solution I found was switching to a newer phone. And I am still using the same USB-C cable that I was originally using on my Note 8 on my Note 20 and it works just fine. 

S8 was really not a great phone (compared to various other gens, like S7 was good). Samsung tends to have an every other version type of thing like Microsoft does.

 

Also too, the S8 is over 4 years old now so I wouldn't be surprised if people have issues with it still.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...