Jump to content

Ordering new 2022

mthree bmw

By mthree bmw
in Future GM News & Rumors

 Share

Recommended Posts

Frey23 New Member

Frey23

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Beastland said:

It means your dealer is waiting for allocation for your truck. They only get so many per week and every week its a different mix of trim and option constraints. They might get allocation for a lt trail boss but only with the 5.3l and so they put someone elses order into the system that week.

That makes sense. I’m just still confused why I was being told it was accepted but now it’s not. Wouldn’t they have had an allocation when it was initially accepted?

  • Replies 412
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

rascal71
rascal71

Sorry for the multiple posts. Don't know how to condense them in 1 post. I pick it up Friday. It's getting a Roll N Lock A series and Toyo Open Country A/T3's 275/70R18 put on it before I pick it up h

kbryant5
kbryant5

I got an allocation from the dealership on wed. Been waiting a month or so on a list. Dealer called wed morning and said by end of day it would be placed. Pretty simple truck, 22 custom 2500hd crew 4x

aptyp
aptyp

Found this ordering guide on the GMC site if someone want to check it out.   https://www.gmc.com/content/dam/gmc/na/us/english/index/vehicles/future-vehicles/sierra-ld-mcm/01-images/GMC_New_

Posted Images

UCF w00t Enthusiast

UCF w00t

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Frey23 said:

That makes sense. I’m just still confused why I was being told it was accepted but now it’s not. Wouldn’t they have had an allocation when it was initially accepted?

You sure it was actually "accepted" (code 2000) previously? I'm not a dealer and not an expert in the process but I wouldn't think it would move in reverse.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
On 2/22/2022 at 5:15 PM, goosehunter said:

Is there any one that has all wheels available on silverado 2022 refresh with there rpo codes???   Thanks!

 

 

Check out the order guide wheels section:

 

Chevy - Model Information - Online Ordering Guide (gmfleetorderguide.com)

 

GMC - Model Information - Online Ordering Guide (gmfleetorderguide.com)

 

If you then navigate to the "EXTERIOR" page in there, you can see the wheel RPO codes and the trims they are standard or optional on.  

  • Thanks 1
Frey23 New Member

Frey23

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, UCF w00t said:

You sure it was actually "accepted" (code 2000) previously? I'm not a dealer and not an expert in the process but I wouldn't think it would move in reverse.

Positive. My dealer even called to tell me it had been accepted. These screenshots are 3 weeks apart from each other 

FF1DA4F1-5D65-46AB-AFD8-FE5517F3C12F.png

DBCFAC53-8623-4A68-BE42-DEA1DDD02314.png

UCF w00t Enthusiast

UCF w00t

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Frey23 said:

Positive. My dealer even called to tell me it had been accepted. These screenshots are 3 weeks apart from each other 

FF1DA4F1-5D65-46AB-AFD8-FE5517F3C12F.png

DBCFAC53-8623-4A68-BE42-DEA1DDD02314.png

Very strange. I'd ask your dealer for an explanation. They can look up the order status history and send it to you. Will show all the status codes and dates it changed to each code. 

Ryan Tierney Enthusiast

Ryan Tierney

Posted
Posted (edited)

Placed an order with my dealer early January. Have a build date for the second week in March. 

 

Feel I've established a good working relationship with my dealer for an earlier purchase in 2021. There was no hesitation to get my custom truck ordered. Unfortunately those having problems are with dealerships trying to oversell their allocation and have you settle for something that just gets shipped from the factory. 

 

Unfortunately I was dragged through the coals trying to order my 2007 avalanche back in October 2006 like some of you guys are now. Best suggestion is to change dealerships ASAP. 

Edited by Ryan Tierney
obrien19 Enthusiast

obrien19

Posted
Posted (edited)

So something that I find very concerning, with the online configurators up. I went over to gmfamilyfirst.com to build out the exact AT4X I have on order. And a huge alert stating "This trim is not eligble for the employee discount". And it is listed for every single trim package on the new Sierra 1500.  So, if they are really not allowing an employee discount on the new trucks, there will be alot of people upset, including myself. Will be interesting to see what happens. 

Edited by obrien19
Dirk13 Enthusiast

Dirk13

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, obrien19 said:

So something that I find very concerning, with the online configurators up. I went over to gmfamilyfirst.com to build out the exact AT4X I have on order. And a huge alert stating "This trim is not eligble for the employee discount". And it is listed for every single trim package on the new Sierra 1500.  So, if they are really not allowing an employee discount on the new trucks, there will be alot of people upset, including myself. Will be interesting to see what happens. 


Same with Supplier Discount website. The Eligible vehicles page says that 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 is eligible, no mention of limited.

obrien19 Enthusiast

obrien19

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dirk13 said:


Same with Supplier Discount website. The Eligible vehicles page says that 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 is eligible, no mention of limited.

Says that the 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 "is" or "isn't" eligble.   When I check the 1500 Limited, I'm seeing an average of 6K off for employee discount. 

Dirk13 Enthusiast

Dirk13

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, obrien19 said:

Says that the 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 "is" or "isn't" eligble.   When I check the 1500 Limited, I'm seeing an average of 6K off for employee discount. 

It just says “Silverado” or “Sierra” under 2022. It doesn’t mention limited but we know that the limited is eligible.

 

All I’m saying is the eligible vehicles page doesn’t mention that the updated 22 doesn’t qualify. So either the build and price tool is wrong or the eligible vehicles page needs update.

anwoodward New Member

anwoodward

Posted
Posted

GMC live chat just indicated that my 2022 refresh denali has been produced.  I got acceptance of my order back on Dec 27th.  Any ideas on how long it should take for delivery from this stage?  The chat indicated that shipping is the next step and I haven't heard back from the dealership yet on the status of my order.   

 

 

Dirk13 Enthusiast

Dirk13

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, obrien19 said:

So something that I find very concerning, with the online configurators up. I went over to gmfamilyfirst.com to build out the exact AT4X I have on order. And a huge alert stating "This trim is not eligble for the employee discount". And it is listed for every single trim package on the new Sierra 1500.  So, if they are really not allowing an employee discount on the new trucks, there will be alot of people upset, including myself. Will be interesting to see what happens. 


FYI, today I called the number for the supplier pricing program. I spoke to a nice, but clueless guy who basically just read off the same website I was looking at and said no discount. 
 

I called the dealer I’ve been working with and he looked into it. Told me the discount would be available on a refreshed 22 and wasn’t sure why the website listed that it wasn’t. 
 

Im going in next week to order a 22 HC, so we will see then how they determine the supplier price. 

rascal71 Enthusiast

rascal71

Posted
Posted
On 2/26/2022 at 4:02 PM, rascal71 said:

Trail Boss Silver Ice Metallic STD bed 3.0 dmax

Ordered on 12/27

Order accepted two weeks later and given a build week of 2/21

The chat on Chevy's website as of yesterday said it still had this build week. Will check with my dealer Monday and see if it got built and report back.

 

Latest update is event code 3400 "broadcast" which means it didn't hit the TPW of 2/21. Don't know if it's because of constraints or just behind on production.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 475 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...