Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, obrien19 said:

So something that I find very concerning, with the online configurators up. I went over to gmfamilyfirst.com to build out the exact AT4X I have on order. And a huge alert stating "This trim is not eligble for the employee discount". And it is listed for every single trim package on the new Sierra 1500.  So, if they are really not allowing an employee discount on the new trucks, there will be alot of people upset, including myself. Will be interesting to see what happens. 

I am right there with you! I've had a 2022 GMC SLT 4x4 Crew Cab with the Duramax and pretty loaded on order since the end of Dec. Now seeing on GMFamilyFirst that there is no employee discount and when I build it out it is coming to just under $63K. As a GM employee this is somewhat disheartening to say the least. 

Posted

This is what I have ordered can't wait for the Duramax because gas in Canada with the stupid carbon tax on is out of control... $127 fill up today. I figure gas is going to cost $800 a month before this BS is over.

2022rrst1.jpg

Posted (edited)

Once your order is gone ( and accepted) is there a way to change a package.....or it is what it is???   Thanks for reading.

 

                        GH

 

Edited by goosehunter
Posted
16 hours ago, eddie046 said:

I am right there with you! I've had a 2022 GMC SLT 4x4 Crew Cab with the Duramax and pretty loaded on order since the end of Dec. Now seeing on GMFamilyFirst that there is no employee discount and when I build it out it is coming to just under $63K. As a GM employee this is somewhat disheartening to say the least. 


They fixed this on the supplier and employee discount websites. Trucks are eligible for discount. 

Posted

I have an AT4X reserved since the reveal in October. TPW of 3/7. Not sure if this is Mexico or Fort Wayne. Do we get to keep our MSRP locked in at the original rate?

Posted
5 minutes ago, TylerH said:

I have an AT4X reserved since the reveal in October. TPW of 3/7. Not sure if this is Mexico or Fort Wayne. Do we get to keep our MSRP locked in at the original rate?

The email gmc sent a while back indicated msrp would be locked in. Back in the day I ordered a new Camaro when it came out and GM upped some of the prices and GM indicated that the msrp was locked in at the order date but some dealers (including mine) tried to go back on it. The confusing thing in that situation was that the window sticker for when the car arrived was the new price so they wanted to go by that. After some back and forth I convinced them to honor the original price. Will be curious to see what happens with these.

Screenshot_20220306-114016.png

Posted

i finally got my 2022 gmc 3500 Denali diesel it was worth the wait its a beautiful ride picked it up Feb. 27 2022 

4736.jpg

4739.jpg

4735.jpg

Posted

Has anyone had their refresh order picked up with carbonpro? I ordered an AT4 back in January but the dealer is being told there is a material shortage. Still 1100. No word on if they are just taking like 1 or 2 carbonpro orders at a time or if they arent taking any

Posted
3 hours ago, Medic4552 said:

Has anyone had their refresh order picked up with carbonpro? I ordered an AT4 back in January but the dealer is being told there is a material shortage. Still 1100. No word on if they are just taking like 1 or 2 carbonpro orders at a time or if they arent taking any

 

2 hours ago, edgart said:

I ordered an AT4 carbon pro on 1/27/22, but it has not been accepted by GMC yet.

There might be a longer wait for allocation for those because of the denali ultimate getting the carbonpro bed. They are getting priority and gm cant make the beds as fast as regular production goes.

Posted

Has anyone seen this video before? Refreshed 2022 Sierra AT4 regular cab and AT4X out on the wild in another country... 

 

hope this post is not out of topic but I find this very interesting  

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Beastland said:

 

There might be a longer wait for allocation for those because of the denali ultimate getting the carbonpro bed. They are getting priority and gm cant make the beds as fast as regular production goes.


This is basically what my dealer told me as well. I ordered a carbon pro AT4 on 1/20 and it’s still at 1100. When I asked why, he said the carbon pros are slated to be a later build due to materials so it’s going to be held up for a long time. 

Posted

I’ve got an order in on a Denali with reserve package. And though it was only another $500 to get the carbonpro bed and Kicker system, dealer told me there was 0 allocation for the option and I was risking a major delay if I opted for it. Decided to leave it out.

Posted
15 hours ago, Beastland said:

 

There might be a longer wait for allocation for those because of the denali ultimate getting the carbonpro bed. They are getting priority and gm cant make the beds as fast as regular production goes.

Yeah i know why they are doing it, I was just curious if anyone other than the people who got the denali ultimate have gotten a build accepted. Figured maybe for every 10 ultimates they might build 1 of something else

Posted

My order for a Denali was accepted for production on 2/11. Not an ultimate though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,962
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    contrabombarde
    Newest Member
    contrabombarde
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 806 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
    • I forgot to answer the question as per what market mine is set to and yes I finally found that area on mine and yes its also set to America.   So here's something I realized as I wasn't looking at that part in the Sierra section until now, your right that what I see here as choice 3 under Sierra which says 07/2023-06/2026 ( 433 MHz 13542523 ) it has no choice 5 for tire pressure selection. Where as it does under the Chev choice. However I kept going down the list within the Sierra and I am really wondering if choice 9 will work for your truck as it has the same model number and hertz sensor as my truck. I would say try that choice first, if that doesn't work then jump over to the Chev section and again choose that same model and hertz choice as for some reason the Chev section gives the choice 5 of tire type/pressure selection for going back a number of years. Could very well be an Autel thing that they just didn't get the updates all done properly under Sierra but anyway first try that selection 9 I suggested under Sierra and then go from there. 
    • Looking for this piece that holds the hose clamp in place. I have the hose clamp just not that other piece. Dealers and wrecking yards in my area will not sell just that piece. They want you to buy the whole air tube $100 +/- to get that $5 part.  that piece isn't molded to the air tube as I looked at my friends truck. It's held on by a screw and nut. I'm trying to put the OEM parts on the truck as the previous owner butchered things up installing an aftermarket CAI. It really looked homemade. 🤣 Thanks
    • Ok I missed that part that yours is a GM. The strange part is that the choice for year ranges and within the year of 2026 is different on the Sierra then on the Chev for some reason as I am looking at my tool at the Sierra choices. Now I am guessing you see as to your sensor part number as it may be different on your truck for some reason and a call to GM should get you the part model number of the sensors you should have as well as which MHz your sensors are. I know mine are the ones as per what I listed but there are other choices in the Autel and got me wondering if by some chance they put different ones in your truck. Having said that, did you try using each of the choices starting from No 1 and going on down the list, not sure if that would mean shutting off the engine each time and resetting the tool and going at it again each time. Also I thought of something else which may sound retarded but if there was some stupid chance that the chev choice would work. The reason I say that is that the Sierra is showing a range up to 06/2026 for the various choices of sensors it could be where as the Chev has one choice that has that 12/2026. By the way it is possible to not run the truck and you may know that as per not pressing the brake but pressing and holding the start button for a few seconds and it lights up the dash ( its called service mode ) but that sucks battery power and if it were me doing it that way I would be throwing on a decent sized battery charger before doing it that way as killing your battery won't make you happy at me at all !.    Like I say, just a thought to try the Chev choices if you have already exhausted the Sierra choices but first it would be nice to know for sure what exact sensor model and hertz your truck uses as I assume only those choices that mention the sensor would work unless a choice that does not mention the sensor model would somehow work. Its frustrating when one is trying to use tools like this without the experience of the tool and the vehicle, as I am sure dealer techs themselves struggle with it when starting out or a new model year comes along that is slightly different. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...