Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, dfanzz01 said:

And these are Hankooks Dynapros at2’s. I saw that u asked specifically about these. They won’t sound louder, and won’t kill ur mpg. Decent tires for the price…. 

Excellent. Thank You.

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, dfanzz01 said:

Honestly, 1st time I’ve heard this. Now, I’m no pro here so… do u know why these are not recommended?

I think because the cone is too narrow for the stock wheel seats. At least that's what I was told when I inquired about using 3/8" spacers and spline ET lug nuts.

Edited by Diamond817
Posted
4 hours ago, Diamond817 said:

I think because the cone is too narrow for the stock wheel seats. At least that's what I was told when I inquired about using 3'8" spacers and spline ET lug nuts.

I misread the OP. I was thinking 305/40/22 being too wide with a 10" min. wheel width.  The 305/45/22 say a 9" min. wheel will work.

Posted
10 hours ago, Diamond817 said:

I think because the cone is too narrow for the stock wheel seats. At least that's what I was told when I inquired about using 3/8" spacers and spline ET lug nuts.

Interesting-I’ll make sure and ask next time I go in for tire rotation. I’m not really a fan of the spline anyways. They were way less expensive than OEM. Was already thinking about swapping them soon. But just to confirm, I haven’t had any issue’s whatsoever with them. Thanks again!

Posted (edited)
On 12/16/2021 at 8:05 PM, mafd2 said:

Yes, dealer installed. They were shipped with steel wheels. Why don't you go with the 275/50? Is that what you have now? You want wider? Or taller? 

Just so you know, all OEM 22's are dealer installed. Doesn't mean they are not factory OEM. It's the way they do it now so the wheels don't get stolen off the vehicles while in transit. Even my wife's 2019 Traverse OEM 20" wheels were shipped separately from the vehicle and dealer installed.

Edited by Diamond817
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Diamond817 said:

Just so you know, all OEM 22's are dealer installed. Doesn't mean they are not factory OEM. It's the way they do it now so the wheels don't get stolen off the vehicles while in transit. Even my wife's 2019 Traverse OEM 20" wheels were shipped separately from the vehicle and dealer installed.

Correct and true.  They are shipped with steel wheels but any OEM 22" wheel can be purchased through GM accessories and have the dealer or a shop install them.

Edited by mafd2
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 12/23/2021 at 12:30 AM, dfanzz01 said:

Yes! They fit, no rubbing and no modifications needed. I installed them on sierra elevation with OEM 22’s

2BBDA6DB-6F87-4505-9DFF-DF90D9E28473.jpeg

The truck looks great! Did you do any modifications for tire clearance? 

Im looking to either go 305/34/22 or 285/45/22

Posted
On 2/4/2024 at 2:58 PM, AvidR said:

The truck looks great! Did you do any modifications for tire clearance? 

Im looking to either go 305/34/22 or 285/45/22

I went with Firestone 285/45/22 A/T2 all terrain on my '22 LTZ Z71. Ride great, super quiet and balanced out perfect.

278568450_174025011635126_7385935080193504018_n (2).jpg

20220403_133322.jpg

Posted

I put a set of Michelin Defender LTX M/S in 305/45R22's on yesterday, they ride better than the Bridgestones, handle better and look much better! I did the same size upgrade on my 19 High Country but used Nitto TG's so I knew that I needed a wider and better tire than the OEM Bridgestone's as they were horrible in the snow and rain.  

Posted
On 2/6/2024 at 8:50 AM, eppieguy said:

I put a set of Michelin Defender LTX M/S in 305/45R22's on yesterday, they ride better than the Bridgestones, handle better and look much better! I did the same size upgrade on my 19 High Country but used Nitto TG's so I knew that I needed a wider and better tire than the OEM Bridgestone's as they were horrible in the snow and rain.  

 I'll be honest, I made this account just to ask you to post pictures of your setup.

 

I'm seriously considering sizing up to the 305/45/22 Defenders and would love to see how they look on a 1500 Denali.

Posted

Here's some Michelin Defender 305 45 22 on my 23 High Country.  Fuel 22x10 +10 offset.

I put these on when it was brand new so I can't compare to the Bridgestones but it rides pretty nice and quiet

20230504_185811.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...