Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, xtrythis1 said:

Interesting topic, shame this doesn't work. I have a Range OBD2 DFM disabler but for the first 5 to 10 miles it still allows DFM to activate which is annoying and not great for a cold engine.. I just leave my trans in L7 (8 speed) and keeps it from kicking on until i hit the 10ish mile mark on a drive. Once i hit around 10 miles or so I can put it in D and runs as it should on all 8 cylinders all the time... until i turn the truck off again then have to start the whole process over again. UGH

That's a bummer. I would be so happy if there was a way to make it so "D" was the same as "L7" on the gear selector so I wouldn't have to toggle up every single time.  I'd be even happier if cylinder deactivation never existed in internal combustion engines to begin with, but we have to set realistic goals, right?

 

Seriously, if the L84 and L87 had 1) regular non-collapsible lifters, 2) a single port fuel injector in addition to the GDI injectors to keep the valves clean, and 3) a friggin' belt tensioner, it would be such a good engine. I also realized I basically described an older LS engine. Hmm....

  • Like 3
Posted

I gave up and went pulsar. It was 100% worth it anyways. Just curious as to what these fuses do anyway. Sure it’s a complex electrical system. But I’m used to say if you pull your blower fan fuse your blower stops working. I think many would agree

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Deadstockpomp said:

I gave up and went pulsar. It was 100% worth it anyways. Just curious as to what these fuses do anyway. Sure it’s a complex electrical system. But I’m used to say if you pull your blower fan fuse your blower stops working. I think many would agree

 

Yes, You can pull a fuse to disable the ecm (engine control module).

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
9 hours ago, Deadstockpomp said:

I gave up and went pulsar. It was 100% worth it anyways. Just curious as to what these fuses do anyway. Sure it’s a complex electrical system. But I’m used to say if you pull your blower fan fuse your blower stops working. I think many would agree

Where is the best spot and price to get a pulsar? Also do you have to reprogram it every time you drive it to keep DFM off or does it save your setting and truck starts with it disabled every time..?

Thx

Posted
1 minute ago, xtrythis1 said:

Where is the best spot and price to get a pulsar? Also do you have to reprogram it every time you drive it to keep DFM off or does it save your setting and truck starts with it disabled every time..?

Thx

 Got mine from Diablosport $488 Once programed saves settings.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, xtrythis1 said:

Where is the best spot and price to get a pulsar? Also do you have to reprogram it every time you drive it to keep DFM off or does it save your setting and truck starts with it disabled every time..?

Thx

 

It's inline, you plug it in and leave it there; you're not reprogramming anything. Pulsar intercepts instructions from the computer and alters it to achieve the desired response.  

 

https://www.rangetechnology.com/products/pulsar_lt/parts/22451

https://documents.rangetechnology.com/pulsar_lt_manual.pdf

Edited by M1ck3y
  • Like 2
Posted

This is why I love these forums. here you have a group of folks that are all trying to decipher a circumstance with the sole reason of finding out much desired info for the greater good !  well done.

 

I'm VERY curious to know how many "Valve Lifter Failures" there has been, in engines that have the Pulsar units installed. Is it still happening?

 

A bit of background... My (potentially mine), '21 AT4, with, get this, a build date of 2/21... ***YIKES*** is supposed to be at the dealer by next week. It's a 5.3 with DFM and Auto Stop. Other than chip shortage issues, No idea why it has been sitting so long.

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, thekcwolf said:

This is why I love these forums. here you have a group of folks that are all trying to decipher a circumstance with the sole reason of finding out much desired info for the greater good !  well done.

 

I'm VERY curious to know how many "Valve Lifter Failures" there has been, in engines that have the Pulsar units installed. Is it still happening?

 

A bit of background... My (potentially mine), '21 AT4, with, get this, a build date of 2/21... ***YIKES*** is supposed to be at the dealer by next week. It's a 5.3 with DFM and Auto Stop. Other than chip shortage issues, No idea why it has been sitting so long.

 

 

I'm guessing this could be one reason: https://gmauthority.com/blog/2021/12/gm-releases-valve-lifter-service-update-for-v8-engines/

 

I would ask if they did the repair on that particular truck or not. I personally would not accept delivery of it until they have.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, voided3 said:

I'm guessing this could be one reason: https://gmauthority.com/blog/2021/12/gm-releases-valve-lifter-service-update-for-v8-engines/

 

I would ask if they did the repair on that particular truck or not. I personally would not accept delivery of it until they have.

 

Problem is, that doesn't work when trucks/vehicles are in high demand.

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
11 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

 

Problem is, that doesn't work when trucks/vehicles are in high demand.

 

The high demand and the fact that there is no "market adjustment" on the vehicle I am waiting for, makes me want sit tight on it. I've seen other MUCH LESS equipped AT4s on the Build and Price/ Dealer Locator pages, listed near or above what this guy quoted me.  That "build date", tho... 2/21... It's 2/22 now !!

Posted

Reviewing another article “It turns out the changes are entirely electrical. The ECM is being swapped while all of the hardware components of AFM/DFM will still be present inside the engines.” Wonder what ECM they are using for this change?

Posted
On 1/31/2022 at 2:27 PM, thekcwolf said:

This is why I love these forums. here you have a group of folks that are all trying to decipher a circumstance with the sole reason of finding out much desired info for the greater good !  well done.

 

I'm VERY curious to know how many "Valve Lifter Failures" there has been, in engines that have the Pulsar units installed. Is it still happening?

 

A bit of background... My (potentially mine), '21 AT4, with, get this, a build date of 2/21... ***YIKES*** is supposed to be at the dealer by next week. It's a 5.3 with DFM and Auto Stop. Other than chip shortage issues, No idea why it has been sitting so long.

 

 

Your truck will have a reissued title and it'll be a 22.

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, 20Denali21 said:

Your truck will have a reissued title and it'll be a 22.

I'm more "concerned" about the fact, that this thing has been sitting around somewhere since February/March of last year and will STILL have these major engine problems !!

 

 

Edited by thekcwolf
Added content
Posted
13 hours ago, thekcwolf said:

I'm more "concerned" about the fact, that this thing has been sitting around somewhere since February/March of last year and will STILL have these major engine problems !!

 

 

Dealers have been instructed to replace the lifters on affected vehicles before they can sell them. I guarantee you thats why all these trucks have been sitting. Not waiting on chips, they're waiting on lifter stock to hit the dealers. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, 20Denali21 said:

Dealers have been instructed to replace the lifters on affected vehicles before they can sell them. I guarantee you thats why all these trucks have been sitting. Not waiting on chips, they're waiting on lifter stock to hit the dealers. 

Yes, there's a TSB out there.  According to a request from  "[email protected]", this vehicle was in an intermediate delivery status in Ft. Wayne.   I hope you're right and I'm also hoping the dealer has something that tells me the work was performed, because that would ease my concerns.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...