Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just picked up a 2022 AT4 with 3.0 diesel and I want to undercoat my truck as I live on a dirt road and in Michigan, this means the truck will get copious amounts of salt/sodium chloride/brine/etc on it both on the dirt roads after resurfacing as well as all winter long on dirt and paved roads. I've been doing a lot of research into undercoating and it sounds like it is widely known now that hard undercoating, such as rubber undercoating products, lock in moisture and cause more harm than good and the new thing is "oil undercoating" which usually means Lanolin-based coating.

If anyone here has applied Fluid Film, WoolWax, or Blaster Surface Shield to their trucks please let me know if you applied over factory wax and if it caused factory wax to come off or if the wax stayed on fine. I saw one report of this in a single thread from long ago but I imagine more folks out there have to be using one of these products as well so trying to check how worried I should be about overspray on wax frame.  I'm also looking for any tips on particular nooks and crannies to keep an eye out for. Did anyone apply it to the drain holes in door? If so any rubber door seal swelling afterwards?  Any spots I should avoid spraying it?

Edited by JustinB60
Posted

I've used Fluid Film since new on my 16 and have no complaints. I try to avoid the waxed areas due to concerns I've read about it degrading the wax. So far so good.

Posted

I didn't get time to do the underneath fully, but I did behind the rear wheel wells when I installed the Husky Liner plastic liners and sprayed before and after I put the step boards on. I used Blaster Corrosion Stop. It's half the price of Fluid Film or others. I did some research of some people testing it on YouTube and it had as good or better results as the more expensive brands. It's safe for plastics/rubber and electronics.

Posted
7 minutes ago, GETGONE said:

I didn't get time to do the underneath fully, but I did behind the rear wheel wells when I installed the Husky Liner plastic liners and sprayed before and after I put the step boards on. I used Blaster Corrosion Stop. It's half the price of Fluid Film or others. I did some research of some people testing it on YouTube and it had as good or better results as the more expensive brands. It's safe for plastics/rubber and electronics.

 

 

Interesting, did you know Blaster just came out with something called surface shield?  I actually picked up a gallon of Blaster surface shield as well as Woolwax and Fluid Film, we have two vehicles and I have a tractor and ATV I plan to spray so it'll all get used one way or another.  The surface shield is getting some great reviews on youtube so I think I'll start with that, Blaster seems to make good stuff.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Blaster-128-SS-Surface-Shield-1-Gal/dp/B09HGL5R58/ref=sr_1_2?crid=S7RUFG4ZTLE1&keywords=Blaster+Surface+Shield&qid=1640054939&sprefix=blaster+surface+shield%2Caps%2C136&sr=8-2

Posted

When I got my truck in May that stuff was being tested and not out for retail sale. Someone on YouTube had a test quart or so of it but didn't have any information as to when it would be available at retailers. It's hard enough finding anything besides FluidFilm around here.

Posted (edited)

I would be interested to know how Blaster Surface Shield behaves on the factory wax.  The video review I saw was on a Colorado which have painted (e-coat?) on the frame.

 

I don't know if you are sticking with only FF, WW and BSS, but I use Corrosion Free 3000 on the wax and so far so good.  Did it since new, annual re-application.  I did find it slowly moves down to the bottom face of the frame.  Makes it look bumpy.  Had some wax fall off after being on a lift for service (at the lift points), but I touch those up with Nox-Rust X-121B the same day.  I also never pressure wash the frame.  I give it a garden hose rise if need be, done it twice to get the dandelion fluff off.

 

I don't drive much since COVID.  But I did drive, when I needed to, through our well seasoned salted and brine roads for 2 winters.  My spare has some salt on it.  Photos are from today, sorry for the bad angles.  Don't feel like getting on the cold ground.

 

 

Photo 2 2021-12-21 at 2.53.15 PM.jpg

Photo 1 2021-12-21 at 2.53.37 PM.jpg

Edited by SilveradoRST
Posted

The Blaster Corrosion Stop doesn't have any effect on the factory coating on the frame since it's a waxy substance anyways. There were a couple thin spots or where I had grabbed the frame and it came off when I was installing my running boards. I just covered the spots with the Blaster and have had no issues so far.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...