Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm going to be a little stubborn here. I'm not going to remove the car wash membership sticker.  I have removed all other RFID signals one by one.  and removing those didn't stop this from happening.  So I don't believe its getting confused with other signals. If it is then GM needs to fix truck.  I'm sure there are thousand of GM Cars/trucks working just fine with a easypass transponder stuck to the windshield.   

Posted

I would agree. It would seem logical that if the easypass was the cause, it would fail everytime.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, rlambert said:

I'm going to be a little stubborn here. I'm not going to remove the car wash membership sticker.  I have removed all other RFID signals one by one.  and removing those didn't stop this from happening.  So I don't believe its getting confused with other signals. If it is then GM needs to fix truck.  I'm sure there are thousand of GM Cars/trucks working just fine with a easypass transponder stuck to the windshield.   

Those transponders are passive (at least all the ones I have had) and are not the problem. They work like the chip on a credit card active only when put under a transponder reader.. I would be looking for something interfering with the remote to truck signal. Could be something on the truck or something in the area you live causing issues. Aftermarket wireless cameras have been known to cause issues with keyless entry/starting.

 

Jay

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Here is a update on this after happening 2 more times.  My dealer service rep. contacted GM cooperate for Tech support on this issue.  He sent them my videos and they took a few days and reviewed them.. The Technician at cooperate came back and suggested that the dealer replace the drivers door latch and locking mechanisms. The thought is that the drivers door is not communicating that its been opened and someone got in the truck, therefore the push button wouldn't work because it thinks no one is in the truck to push that button.  So 3 days in and so far the issues has not presented itself.   Time will tell. 

 

        Its no wonder these trucks need all these computer chips and cost so darn much. Who would have thought the drivers door tells the truck when its been opened?  I would rather just put a key in the dash and turn it. Than to have this ridiculous push button, And I never know what to do with the remote once I'm in truck.  then I always forget to take it with me after driving. and I get the 3 horn beeps reminding me....... 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Back to square one! 

   Went to get in the running truck Sat. morning and once again it wouldn't let me take control.  Had to take another vehicle to do what I set out to do, came home 7 hours later, tried truck and worked like nothing happened.  This is so frustrating  because the dealership can't get it to do it when it at the shop. Its been a little over 3 weeks since the last incident. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Any luck with this issue? Very similar issues happened to me about a month ago (2019 Silverado LTZ) chalked it up to a dead battery and switched to the spare fob. Replaced the battery in both to be safe, and this past week it has done it at least once every day. I can lock an unlock the truck, remote start, drop the tailgate.. everything but actually drive the thing. It will give me the same DIC message every time.. "Press Engine Start Button To Learn" (you cannot start the truck). The next message is "Remote Learn Pending Please Wait" and I have to go through the whole cycle as if I'm programming the fobs right out of the manual. I intentionally reprogrammed both fobs last night and everything worked until I tried to leave work. I have to wait for the 30 minute timeout before I can start the truck. Can't get into the dealership until Monday.

Posted

Hey Doug1234  

      They (GM) has not figured this out for my truck as of yet.  About a month ago they replaced my drivers door latch?  Telling me that it wasn't telling the computer that someone entered the truck So, it wasn't looking for the Start Button to be pushed. That didn't help. About a week later the truck acted up again and it spent over a week at the dealership.  They came back and said they were going to try a new drivers door window switch.  Telling me that everything loops through the door and that is what GM wants to do for the next troubleshooting idem?   So, I really have no faith that it will solve the issue but its been 5 days now without it happening.   

     Please update me here as to what they tell u.     My service rep actually told me that he was surprised that GM hasn't done a "buy back" on my truck.  I told him they won't because I'm the 2nd owner. I bought it as a GMC certified vehicle with 12K miles on it. He says yes being the 2nd owner I lose those rights.  Kind of stinks for me.  so I all I can do is be a pain in their side until this is fixed.  I have 20,000 more miles to get it right.  fingers crossed.  Hope u get better results. 

Posted

A couple of months ago I purchased a wireless charger for my iPhone to mount in the truck. Some kind of interference  was happening with the electronics as I started receiving the Remote Not Detected message almost immediately. The manufacturer of the charger sent me an older model (the previous model of the New & Improved version) and the problem went away.

Posted

Dejadoo, I wish my problem was as simple as interference lol Glad you got your issue figured out! My truck has no issue recognizing the fob, it just puts itself into key learning mode (which should only be possible through inserting the key in the driver's side door and turning CCW 5 times in 10 seconds) and I can't get out of it until 30 minutes is up, even holding the start/stop button for 12 seconds does nothing until that timer is up. No shot the dealer is going to be able to replicate, even with my videos.

Posted
On 4/20/2022 at 10:02 AM, rlambert said:

Hey Doug1234  

      They (GM) has not figured this out for my truck as of yet.  About a month ago they replaced my drivers door latch?  Telling me that it wasn't telling the computer that someone entered the truck So, it wasn't looking for the Start Button to be pushed. That didn't help. About a week later the truck acted up again and it spent over a week at the dealership.  They came back and said they were going to try a new drivers door window switch.  Telling me that everything loops through the door and that is what GM wants to do for the next troubleshooting idem?   So, I really have no faith that it will solve the issue but its been 5 days now without it happening.   

     Please update me here as to what they tell u.     My service rep actually told me that he was surprised that GM hasn't done a "buy back" on my truck.  I told him they won't because I'm the 2nd owner. I bought it as a GMC certified vehicle with 12K miles on it. He says yes being the 2nd owner I lose those rights.  Kind of stinks for me.  so I all I can do is be a pain in their side until this is fixed.  I have 20,000 more miles to get it right.  fingers crossed.  Hope u get better results. 

I can kinda see where they are coming from but if you have the same thing as me, it's not an issue of not recognizing the RKE, it's that it (the immobilizer or some related component) is putting itself into key learning when there's no way it should be, according to what the manuals states it requires to do so. I have been able to replicate the issue when entering through other doors, but it's completely random. 

Posted

Doug1234,   

    my truck does give me the "Learning remote please wait" message in the DIC when it acts up.  I've had the remote batteries replace twice now over the last year and had them reprogramed as well.  Did not solve the issue.  Its been a week now since the window switch has been replace and so far no issues. If its going to follow the previous patterns it should act up here soon. 

Posted

Dejadoo  the dealer did suggest that I might have something interfering.  I removed everything. The E-Z pass, the RFID chip to my house door and anything else I could think of and did not help my issues. 

 

Doug1234   sounds like you and I have the same issue going on.  when my issue come up my fob works for everything.  doors, tailgate, remote start but I would get the learning remote message and the trucks push start button won't let me go anywhere.  I wait and hour or so and come back to truck and everything is fine and works as it should until the next random time it decides to act up. 

Posted

rlambert, I got lucky (or unlucky) that I got to the dealership today before they opened and they asked me to bring it into the service bay, go out and it happened! Had a service tech come out and remote started it and he's like put it in drive and I'm like good luck, here's the fob, wait 30 minutes and you can move it 😂 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Keeping yall updated. Yesterday, the dealership gave me a new fob since they thought that was the issue (told them highly doubtful, but I'll take their word for it) and got stranded twice today to and from work using the new fob.. taking it back in next week when they have time to look at it again. I still believe it's whatever component/software that stores the RKE codes and authorizes new codes that's fubar. 

Posted

Doug1234  That is very interesting to me that it happened to them.  Please keep me updated as to what they do.  I am now a week and 5 days since they replaced my drivers window switch.  So far no issues but it has to work correctly for a few months before I say that fixed the problem.   Keep us updated. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...