Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 7X14 cargo trailer I use to move annually for my job.  I haul my apartment furiture and clothes, etc. so probably around 5,000 - 7,000 lbs total.  When I first bought the trailer, I had a 2015 LT with the 5.3/6-speed and it did very well, but mileage was probably 9.5 MPG and you definitely felt the trailer back there.  In 2019 I traded for a Trail Boss (5.3/8-speed) and towed a couple of years with that.  I have to say it was quite an improvement - probably due mostly to the 8-speed vs. 6-speed, but there were times going down the highway that I almost forgot there was a trailer back there.  Mileage was not as good as my previous truck though, coming in around 8.5 MPG.  I did have 33" BFG KO2's on it, so that probably didn't help. 

 Due to the 95% highway driving I do , I decided the Trail Boss wasn't really what I needed and sold it back to the dealer last year when they were offering cash for used vehicles and did pretty well.  I bought a 2021 LTZ with the 6.2/10-speed standard bed, but had to wait 6 months for it to arrive waiting on chips.  It was worth the wait though because it has everything except the technology package.  It even came with the rear heated seats.  I haven't had a chance to tow with it yet, but I imagine it will tow that trailer like a dream.  Bottom line the Trail Boss was a very capable towing vehicle and I would probably still be driving it if I was able to spend more time off the highway with it.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 3/15/2022 at 5:19 PM, Jrodpic said:


most people don’t recommend going much over about 80% of the max combined. I would say a 7,000 pound trailer is the max you would want to pull with a Trail Boss.

 

I guess its a bit different since you are talking about combined weight, including the truck. but the manual doesn't even recommend using the truck's towing mode until you're at 75% of the capacity or greater.

I always wonder about these rules of thumb. But then I don't do a ton of towing. But why stay limited to 80% of the rating? It should be perfectly safe to tow what its rated for shouldn't it? When engineers rate how much something can tow they probably do extensive testing to find out what the absolute maximum amount a vehicle can pull safely, then publish the max capacity as 75-80% of that number. (just a guess, I don't know what the industry standard for the factor of safety is on tow ratings)

 

I found this which was really interesting although it's discussing heavy duty trucks

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a29339668/how-truck-tow-rating-is-calculated/

 

Basically there is an SAE standard for several different performance characteristics. Acceleration tests, braking tests, handling tests etc. in order for a truck to be rated to tow 9200lbs, it must be able to meet or exceed the limits on each of those tests when loaded at 100% of the published rating.

 

I sure wouldn't want to tow that much because I'm not very experienced at it, but I don't see why anyone should be afraid to tow what the vehicle is rated to tow. Imagine the fall out for a car company if a truck was found (after say an accident) to be unsafe and unable to accelerate, brake, or corner safely at or under its published tow rating...that could be the end of them in the truck market.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, kodiakdenali said:

 

I guess its a bit different since you are talking about combined weight, including the truck. but the manual doesn't even recommend using the truck's towing mode until you're at 75% of the capacity or greater.

I always wonder about these rules of thumb. But then I don't do a ton of towing. But why stay limited to 80% of the rating? It should be perfectly safe to tow what its rated for shouldn't it? When engineers rate how much something can tow they probably do extensive testing to find out what the absolute maximum amount a vehicle can pull safely, then publish the max capacity as 75-80% of that number. (just a guess, I don't know what the industry standard for the factor of safety is on tow ratings)

 

I found this which was really interesting although it's discussing heavy duty trucks

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a29339668/how-truck-tow-rating-is-calculated/

 

Basically there is an SAE standard for several different performance characteristics. Acceleration tests, braking tests, handling tests etc. in order for a truck to be rated to tow 9200lbs, it must be able to meet or exceed the limits on each of those tests when loaded at 100% of the published rating.

 

I sure wouldn't want to tow that much because I'm not very experienced at it, but I don't see why anyone should be afraid to tow what the vehicle is rated to tow. Imagine the fall out for a car company if a truck was found (after say an accident) to be unsafe and unable to accelerate, brake, or corner safely at or under its published tow rating...that could be the end of them in the truck market.

 
Probably a few factors in play. My guess is while what you’re saying might be true, pushing a truck to the limits might be safe and feasible short term doesn’t mean it is in the long term. 

Posted
Just now, Jrodpic said:

 
Probably a few factors in play. My guess is while what you’re saying might be true, pushing a truck to the limits might be safe and feasible short term doesn’t mean it is in the long term. 

 

also a valid point. I always wonder with the kinds of tests they do to validate tow ratings...what happens when that vehicle is 15 years old with 200k on it. will it still meet the same specs? Especially tests like braking while fully loaded, that's a safety issue regardless of how old the truck is. I hope the tow rating standards isn't 'we promise it will do this...at least until the warranty runs out'

Posted

The car manufacturers aren't our nannies.  We have to use some horse sense here fellas.  If you maintain your vehicle and don't cheap out on parts it will be perfectly capable of handling those capacities 15-20 years later or more.  

 

As KodiakDenali stated, Tow/Haul isn't even recommended until we hit 75% or more of our GCWR.

  • Like 1
Posted

My boat wasn't 75% of capacity but I tow in the mountains so I used Tow/Haul every time. Shift point change was a better fit.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I'm towing a 24' enclosed car hauler with a combined weight of 8k when my Camaro is loaded. I run a 21 Elevation with a 5.3 and 10spd and a 9300 rated tow capacity. I run a Blue Ox WDH on link 9. It tows it pretty well. I got 10.3mpg the other day on a 220 mile round trip to New Jersey Motorsports Park. I pretty much stay in the right lane as much as possible and keep it around 65-70mph. Do I feel it? Yes. Is it unsafe? No. You have to be careful pulling something that's pretty much a box on wheels, but if you take your time and don't put yourself in dumb situations it's perfectly adequate. These new T1 trucks are plenty capable. 

Edited by kmeleon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,959
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Matt Parker
    Newest Member
    Matt Parker
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 870 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...