Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

JUst curious but is the USA able to produce its own Urea from Ammonia nitrate stockpiles that are being blocked from Russian imports, or will this be another point of weakness for Americas manufactuering

Anti-Russian sanctions may stop Finnish diesel cars – media — RT World News

 

what are some alternatives to using DEF fluids?? I heard human urin contains lots of Ammonia, could one safely piss in the DEF tank on a diesel to safely operate the catalytic converter system and not go into limp mode??? Anyone try this?

 

 

Edited by pokismoki
Posted

If-When we get through this I hope we bring all important manufacturing  back to America-Canada. Of course the current administration still is trying to get oil from our enemies. 

Posted

We can't find people who will work here now, how do you suppose we'll find that many more workers if some of jobs were to return to the US?

 

Posted

If'n you could mix your urine and water in the correct ratio, it might work.

 

I can't piss enough the way it is, to even make a dent in the tank capacity. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, unit said:

We can't find people who will work here now, how do you suppose we'll find that many more workers if some of jobs were to return to the US?

 

Quit giving away free stuff, people will work 

  • Like 1
Posted

Iirc, US+Can production of urea is more than russia. 

 

Indonesia and India are also huge producers.

  • Like 1
Posted

Finally a good reason to go visit the crazy cat lady.  Just have her collect the cat urine in plastic gallon jugs, and give it to the kids in the neighborhood.  Will save her money on kitty litter, and kids can sell urea instead of lemonade.

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

There is no shortage of DEF in North America. I work for the worlds largest producer of DEF and its in the US/Canada. All our plants are running and I have not heard of any issues with supply chains. The biggest problem is finding drivers to deliver it to bottling plants nobody want to work and there is a shortage of drivers. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...