Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Folks.. I am shopping for a new 2022 Refresh Locally and found a Dealer who has the Same Interior and exterior color LTZ LTD and LTZ Refresh... They Both have the same Stock Manufacture Photos so I opened Both but in different tabs... Then I made sure both Pics were the same View Point and I quickly Toggled back and Forth to see the Differences... Man, You can really see how much they changed on the Interior... I thought I would share and Hopefully its Useful... Here are the Links... LMK What you think..

 

New 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LTD LTZ Crew Cab in Warminster #L1262 | Patriot Chevrolet Of Warminster, Inc. (chevyofwarminster.com)

New 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LTZ Crew Cab in Warminster # | Patriot Chevrolet Of Warminster, Inc. (chevyofwarminster.com)

Posted

Yepp. They spent 90% of the refresh on the interior.  Which needed it badly.  Little disappointed to see they didn’t even touch the taillights.  But I get it guess.  Still a huge improvement.  

Posted

Got rid of the "sideburns" which will please a lot of people. Probably one of the most polarizing features on the T1.

Posted

New interior doesn't look like it was made from Lego blocks. That's better. Smoother more continuous look. I like the dash. Rest of the truck....yea.....not so much. 

  • Like 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

New interior doesn't look like it was made from Lego blocks. That's better. Smoother more continuous look. I like the dash. Rest of the truck....yea.....not so much. 

What if it had the almighty 4.3 ? Then maybe would you consider it ?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

When you look at what you get in a Hyundai or Kia today at 40-45k msrp.. The new Kia Sorento is a damn good looking ride inside and out imo. You would think at a average price of 50-55k you would get a bit more then what gm offers in it's truck line, even the redesign falls a bit short for what the cost of these trucks are today imo. 

 

 

2022-Kia-Sorento-interior.jpg

 

1629739441937.jpeg

2022-KIA-Sorento-interior.jpg

2022-Kia-Sorento-front.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, BIGDOGx said:

When you look at what you get in a Hyundai or Kia today at 40-45k msrp.. The new Kia Sorento is a damn good looking ride inside and out imo. You would think at a average price of 50-55k you would get a bit more then what gm offers in it's truck line, even the redesign falls a bit short for what the cost of these trucks are today imo. 

 

 

2022-Kia-Sorento-interior.jpg

 

1629739441937.jpeg

2022-KIA-Sorento-interior.jpg

2022-Kia-Sorento-front.jpg

 

 

Why dont you get one of those ? :) 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BIGDOGx said:

When you look at what you get in a Hyundai or Kia today at 40-45k msrp.. The new Kia Sorento is a damn good looking ride inside and out imo. You would think at a average price of 50-55k you would get a bit more then what gm offers in it's truck line, even the redesign falls a bit short for what the cost of these trucks are today imo. 

 

 

2022-Kia-Sorento-interior.jpg

 

1629739441937.jpeg

2022-KIA-Sorento-interior.jpg

2022-Kia-Sorento-front.jpg

 

 

That interior looks horrible. 
 

I wonder how good it will pull my dump trailer.

 

Apples to oranges comparison. 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, BIGDOGx said:

When you look at what you get in a Hyundai or Kia today at 40-45k msrp.. The new Kia Sorento is a damn good looking ride inside and out imo. You would think at a average price of 50-55k you would get a bit more then what gm offers in it's truck line, even the redesign falls a bit short for what the cost of these trucks are today imo. 

 

 

2022-Kia-Sorento-interior.jpg

 

1629739441937.jpeg

2022-KIA-Sorento-interior.jpg

2022-Kia-Sorento-front.jpg

 

 

I had the chance to buy a KIA Sorento, Telluride, and Hyundai Pallisade, but choose to go with a Traverse Redline Edition. Yes, the interiors are nice, IDK if that much nicer than the Traverse. I love how I can hide things behind my 8 inch touch screen on my traverse where the others had just a tablet slammed right in-front of your face. The new Explorer is the worst. The huge tablet just sits there hanging right in front of you. No thanks, I like an inlayed screen that flows with the vehicle.

 

I think these Traverse's are nice looking especially in redline edition. Rides amazing, has very good power (wish they would drop in a 5.3L for more power in an SS model),  and gets 25-27 mpgs depending on how aggressive "we" drive it! 
 

057001FA-F037-4026-8758-BBFB6A1C5B6A.jpeg

Edited by TNTSilverado
  • Like 2
Posted

I think the new re-fresh is a home run, both exterior and interior wise. They both look amazing! Only if GM would have spent a little time upgrading the V8 engines!!!! Then one would probably be in my driveway! 

 

Thanks @Mcarlo24 for the pictures and comparing the two. Appreciate it! 

Posted
1 hour ago, TNTSilverado said:

I think the new re-fresh is a home run, both exterior and interior wise. They both look amazing! Only if GM would have spent a little time upgrading the V8 engines!!!! Then one would probably be in my driveway! 

 

Thanks @Mcarlo24 for the pictures and comparing the two. Appreciate it! 

Whats there to update with the v8's? Just curious

Posted
59 minutes ago, Anon12345 said:

Whats there to update with the v8's? Just curious

A 20 or so bump in horsepower and torque would be nice. Especially on the 5.3L. Also, making the 10L90 standard across the board would be a welcomed change. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Anon12345 said:

Whats there to update with the v8's? Just curious

Considering the 2.7 turbo makes more torque than the 5.3, I’d say a power upgrade would be a good start.

 

Oh and idk maybe redesign that pesky lifter system that has been causing issues for years.

 

You know, just a few little things. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Dirk13 said:

Considering the 2.7 turbo makes more torque than the 5.3, I’d say a power upgrade would be a good start.

 

Oh and idk maybe redesign that pesky lifter system that has been causing issues for years.

 

You know, just a few little things. 

5.3 makes 383 lb ft of torque and the 2.7 is 348 lb ft of torque so try again on that one.  Plus, would you really give up a NA v8 making those numbers just to drive a boosted 4 banger?  4 bangers are trash and always will be, sad it needs boost to make only decent numbers.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Anon12345 said:

5.3 makes 383 lb ft of torque and the 2.7 is 348 lb ft of torque so try again on that one.  Plus, would you really give up a NA v8 making those numbers just to drive a boosted 4 banger?  4 bangers are trash and always will be, sad it needs boost to make only decent numbers.

You’re wrong.

It has 430 lb ft as of the 2022 refresh trucks.

 

E51848FC-49E2-442E-91F8-3BD214FD78F0.thumb.png.0ef0a619b8cc86c6464d72abaf423833.png

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...