Jump to content

2016 6L80 ATF analysis

16LT4
 Share

Recommended Posts

16LT4 Enthusiast

16LT4

Posted
Posted (edited)

My '16 5.3 CCSB 4x4 currently has 105,500 miles on it.  Back in September on a quick weekend trip NY-OBX, I noticed a slight 100 RPM hunt going up slight inclines at 68 mph in 6th gear and V8 mode.  I'd never noticed it before, but hadn't driven it down there with the new exhaust on the truck, either.  If it weren't for the slight change in exhaust note, I never would have noticed the slight tach needle movement.  I figured it was torque management, but to be sure, I performed a drain/fill when I got home at 104,750 and sent it in to blackstone.

 

I changed the filter and performed 3 drain-fills at 72k miles with Castrol D6, adding a bottle of Lubegard on the final fill.  At ~92k miles last summer, I performed a single drain-fill with Redline D6, again with a bottle of LG, and "flipped the pill" in the AT T-stat.  In January 2022 I installed the updated 70*F ATF T-stat at 99k miles.  This most recent time, I used AC Delco FS D6, a bottle of LG, and a tube of Shudder Fix for good measure.  The slight RPM hunt vanished immediately.

 

AFM is enabled, I always drive in "D" (never M5), and the truck spends probably half its life in V4 mode.  I occasionally tow and haul much more in the bed than the truck is rated for, loading firewood in the bed until it hits the bumpstops, and then keep loading. 😇  With very little exception, the truck is driven at least a half hour every time I start it, and has been used for my long distance (400 mile round trip work commute) at least a half dozen times since August due to fuel prices and is cheaper to run than anything else I own (E85 is a dollar cheaper per gallon than 87).  I seldom "floor it," I don't normally force a multi-gear downshift, never use remote start and don't let the vehicle idle to warm up.  Most of the truck's life has been on the highway, and is probably much of the reason for the report.  My curiosity piqued, I sent in the engine oil last week at its 5k mile oil change.

 

Here is the ATF Report.  I'm happy!  To continue the trend, I'll be keeping with drain-fills every 10-15k miles.

 

16 Silverado ATF UOA 10.20.22.jpg

Edited by 16LT4
  • Like 3
Eddie 70 Senior Enthusiast

Eddie 70

Posted
Posted

Been changing a gallon of fluid in my 2014 every 15k miles for the last several years. I use GM fluid because it is easy to get. The fluid looks new every time I check it now. I am currently at 120k miles and the truck seems to be doing fine. I agree with you that frequent changes helps. Blackstone seems to think it does.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
steelerdude15 Enthusiast

steelerdude15

Posted
Posted

I am also in this boat. I drained/refilled 3.5 quarts last weekend at 45,000 miles. I dropped the pan and changed the filter and six quarts at 30,000 miles. I plan on continuing to follow this schedule.

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

I do an 8 quart Red Line D6 drop and fill every 25K. (aftermarket pan). 

Ran a "pill flip" for years. Recently installed the new 70C thermostat and monitor temps like a hawk on spring rabbit. 

As mine is behind a 4.3 I don't have the problematic V8 JMBX torque converter. 

162K on the clock. Almost 3900 hours it now and it shifts flawlessly, hot or cold.

 

IMG_0103.JPG.9ce62ef68f36d5258dcb76429da795d0.JPG

  • Like 4
16LT4 Enthusiast

16LT4

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 10/26/2022 at 10:02 PM, steelerdude15 said:

I am also in this boat. I drained/refilled 3.5 quarts last weekend at 45,000 miles. I dropped the pan and changed the filter and six quarts at 30,000 miles. I plan on continuing to follow this schedule.

 

Only 3.5 quarts?  Every drain/fill I've ever performed on a 6L80 takes 6.5 quarts.  Even a 6L45 will take 4.5-5 quarts.

steelerdude15 Enthusiast

steelerdude15

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, 16LT4 said:

 

Only 3.5 quarts?  Every drain/fill I've ever performed on a 6L80 takes 6.5 quarts.  Even a 6L45 will take 4.5-5 quarts.

I should have been more clear about what I did. I extracted 3.5 quarts out of the dipstick tube and put the same amount back in. I didn’t drop the pan this time around. I plan on dropping the pan at 60,000 miles.

  • Like 2
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted

Good report, here are two of mine for comparison.  ACDelco Dexron VI only seems to last for about 40K miles.

Blackstone-Labs Report - 280076-TR-220905 - No Personal Data.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
16LT4 Enthusiast

16LT4

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 10/29/2022 at 1:01 AM, steelerdude15 said:

I should have been more clear about what I did. I extracted 3.5 quarts out of the dipstick tube and put the same amount back in. I didn’t drop the pan this time around. I plan on dropping the pan at 60,000 miles.

 

Ah, OK.  Shows how much "meat is left on the bone" sucking fluid out vs. a full drain.  3.5 quarts is only about 25% of the total fluid capacity.  I was on the fence about pulling the pan to change the filter this time, but figured I'd wait for the UOA to come back.  I'm glad I did; the filter can wait a while.  For the next several 10s of thousands of miles, I'll simply remove the drain plug and let'er go.  Pour in 6-6.5 quarts via the dipstick tube and drive away, couldn't be easier or quicker.  Much easier than my BMW which has a fill hole requiring pumping in fluid with the engine running above me while watching fluid temps on the scan tool (filling temp is 50* C colder than operating temp on that one) or my wife's old VW which didn't have a fill hole, only a drain hole, requiring filling via the drain.

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted (edited)

1865432247_GMCtranscrop.thumb.jpg.f8fb3fbb2ae26ddb4b82456da98bdea6.jpgYou have a drain plug?  I had to install my own.

 

Edited by Spurshot

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,532 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...