Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, beetle said:

I just wanted to know if anyone else had a dealer experience similar to mine, it was a fair question, ok?

Well you said almost certain. That may get you a conviction in New York. In most cases it’s called reasonable doubt. Honda sprays and cleans everything. If they change the filter and replaced the fluid from the pan drop. Your fluid will be diluted at best. And probably still dark.

Posted
29 minutes ago, beetle said:

I just wanted to know if anyone else had a dealer experience similar to mine, it was a fair question, ok?

 

Not a problem. I just didn't want to ramble on about how to make the job easier if you weren't interested. Just being cautious. 😉

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I am new here, my 2018 power train is up on June 27th, truck only has a little over 9k on the clock. I noticed the transmission was surging, and would shift harshly when I was in Arizona last week. I don't drive it much, didn't notice anything until it was over 110 outside, and I live in a cooler climate. I found this thread, found and printed out the TSB, took it to the dealer. The dealer told me they can't duplicate the issue, primarily because it doesn't get hot enough here, so they won't replace the TBV, they said there has to be other transmission issues before they will replace it, they don't replace them individually. It isn't the cost of buying it myself, or installing it, it's still under warranty, and with my son living in Phoenix, I will be driving in hot weather. Why does GM have to be so difficult?

  • 5 months later...
Posted

My 2014 Silverado’s tc just ****** the bed right after full front and rear end rebuild and has 172k miles on it. I’ve got a reman trans that can be shipped to my door for 2600$….question is should I spend a few extra hundred bucks or whatever and go for an upgraded tc or stick with the tc that comes with the reman trans(I’ll be happy if I can get another 50k outa truck so not trying to go overboard with spending but only want to fix ****** once if I can)

Posted
2 hours ago, BraydenH said:

My 2014 Silverado’s tc just ****** the bed right after full front and rear end rebuild and has 172k miles on it. I’ve got a reman trans that can be shipped to my door for 2600$….question is should I spend a few extra hundred bucks or whatever and go for an upgraded tc or stick with the tc that comes with the reman trans(I’ll be happy if I can get another 50k outa truck so not trying to go overboard with spending but only want to fix ****** once if I can)

I think a lot depends on the brand of rebuilt transmission you are buying and what kind of torque converter they put in it. Maybe reach out to the rebuilder?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, mikeyk101 said:

I think a lot depends on the brand of rebuilt transmission you are buying and what kind of torque converter they put in it. Maybe reach out to the rebuilder?

 

IMG_6885.png

IMG_6884.png

Posted
Just now, BraydenH said:

 

IMG_6885.png

IMG_6884.png

These seem like a solid deal but I’m not even sure the difference between these two

Posted
16 hours ago, BraydenH said:

These seem like a solid deal but I’m not even sure the difference between these two

I'm not sure either other than the visual differences of the green torque converter in one and the blue in other. It would be nice if the info was included in the description but a phone call may be necessary. They do have a decent warranty.

  • Thanks 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

I did the Superior Solutions install at about 35K and just changed the fluid on my 2015 for the first time at 101K.  The fluid was brown but didn't smell burnt (though I have no expereince with transmission work so I may just knwo the proper smell).  There was a lot of ine material in the pan and on the magnet.  I have not had any issues with my trans so far.

 

My question is on the amount of transmission fluid.  Dropping the pan resulted in 1 and a quarter-ish gallon milk jugs worth of fluid not including the spillage, which was not a huge amount.  I poured in a gallon and then drove it to get it up to 160 (which is hard with the Superior install) to see what the dipstick indicated.  Reading the dipstick with the new fluid is damn tough (yes the dipstick is clean).  The fluid is damn near clear in the small amount that comes up on the dipstick.  Best I could tell it was right at the bottom of the hot zone.  This made no sense to me.  I definitely took out more than a gallon.  I drove it home and checked it there and it looked a touch below Hot so I added about a quart.  It then read higher than HOT.  I checked it again much later when it was cool and the fluid level still looked about the same level as when the trans was hot.

 

Knowing that it is bad to run the trans with too much fluid I have been fretting over this issue.  I have been telling myself that the amount should be fine since I removed 1.25+ gallons and put back 1.25 gallons.  I did install a new pan with the drain plug so I can take alittle out that way or with a pump but the dipstick issue has me worried because I am just not comfortable that I will be able to use it to actually tell what the fluid level is. 

 

Any one have any wisdom to share?

Posted

Honestly it's fine. In the performance world everyone overfills the transmission by about 1 quart because the fluid level could drop under really heavy acceleration. Showing just above the hot mark is fine if you ask me.

 

But if it worries you, just suck out a pint of fluid from the dipstick tube or drain a tiny bit.

 

Without pulling the dipstick myself, I'm not able to see what you are seeing but I know the fluid level can be tough to read on the stick with new fluid sometimes. And getting the temps up to above 160 is kinda easy if you live out past the suburbs. Just do a bunch of full throttle launches and really work the transmission, you'll see temps in the 180-190's in no time.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/1/2022 at 12:12 PM, Western96 said:

My truck has 58k miles on it and I already have hard shifts pretty frequently with the 6L80. The torque converter swap is not something I'm capable of doing in my apartment parking space, but I do want to attempt some of these other recommendations. Already changed the fluid early this year which didn't seem to have a major effect.

How is it since your post 2.5 years ago? Have you done any preventative work to your tranny?

Posted
On 12/4/2024 at 9:22 PM, BraydenH said:

My 2014 Silverado’s tc just ****** the bed right after full front and rear end rebuild and has 172k miles on it. I’ve got a reman trans that can be shipped to my door for 2600$….question is should I spend a few extra hundred bucks or whatever and go for an upgraded tc or stick with the tc that comes with the reman trans(I’ll be happy if I can get another 50k outa truck so not trying to go overboard with spending but only want to fix ****** once if I can)

Can we get an update pls I’m really interested to hear about your situation

Posted
On 4/3/2023 at 3:16 PM, No Tyme said:

Well the trucks is getting the original pan dropped this week, filter change and I am having this pan with a drain plug installed. Hope the drain plug does not interfere with the filter.

Anyone put the plug in this area?

I have no idea how much clearance there is in this area

IMG_2993.JPG

I wish I was smart enough to install a drain plug in the pan when I had my tranny rebuilt last summer lol

  • Thanks 1
Posted

150k on my 14 all terrain and Im starting to get a little slippage. 

 

thinking of going back with a Circle D converter , anything out there better and more affordable?

 

i put the thermal bypass in there already

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 5/2/2025 at 3:29 AM, Chris krum said:

150k on my 14 all terrain and Im starting to get a little slippage. 

 

thinking of going back with a Circle D converter , anything out there better and more affordable?

 

i put the thermal bypass in there already

You can go with a CTSV converter, 24045127.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 281 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...