Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Took the new 6.6 gas on a heavy tow today.  Had to haul some 6 weight calves to the sale barn.  GCVW was just shy of 26K without me in it.  We were maxed out!  To give some perspective I live in Western Kansas and its pretty much flat.  Outside of a few climbs in where some dry rivers are, it's pretty easy towing (this isn't the Rocky Mountains out here).  I will say one thing I was impressed with how this thing did.  I still have my 15 LML and love that pickup but this new 6.6 gas ain't no slouch either.  I was mainly keeping it locked into 5th gear running between 65-70 and it did fine.  Only downshifted to fourth a couple times on some small grades.  One stretch I let it shift into 6th and it pulled it fine, but I kept in 5th most of the way just to keep tranny happy.  The attached picture of the gauges on that 6th gear run.  Never saw the trans temp go above 160 and had zero issues keeping speed.  I think the 6 speed is adequate but it's a little doggy in the mid-range.  The only flat spot in the power band is shifting into third and into fourth.  Just kind of a dead area of power/torque.  No issues on low end to get moving and once up to speed things are good.  I think the new 10 speed will correct this.  I do miss the exhaust brake though.  That's probably the biggest issue.  As far as mileage goes I was shocked.  I pulled the calves 80 miles and computer said just a touch over 10 mpg!!  Maybe I was just lucky today but that was impressive.  My LML usually only does about 11 with this type of load.  I have 5000 miles on now and seems like the engine is settled in as the mileage keeps getting better.  Lifetime mileage so far is 13 and my LML is 14.5.  Still love the diesel and plan to keep it around but I was smiling pretty big today with the performance of this 6.6.  Hope this real world experience might help someone wondering about the towing ability.  If GM got the hp up to 450 and the 10 speed there would be a lot more gassers being ordered I would imagine.  

IMG_1476.jpg

IMG_1477.jpg

IMG_1475.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, Pryme said:

How much do the calves weigh? How much is it per head in Kansas, for say 1k-1,200lb?

Had 21 calves on the trailer weighed 640 lbs avg.  I'd say 1000 lb steers would bring $1.70+ in this market.  Pretty hot right now.  If it ever gets to raining again out here be out of sight in 2024.  Massive herd liquidation out west past year.  We won't be able to hang on this summer if it doesn't rain/snow soon.  Driest I've seen it in a long while.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

My GCVW of my 2500hd is 24,000 and I don't ever see my truck up at that weight but it's nice to hear that 6.6 doing ok that heavy. I hate to compare it to my old 6.0 but man it pulls and tows so much better 😀

Posted
9 hours ago, 77xbody said:

My GCVW of my 2500hd is 24,000 and I don't ever see my truck up at that weight but it's nice to hear that 6.6 doing ok that heavy. I hate to compare it to my old 6.0 but man it pulls and tows so much better 😀

Yeah this 6.6 runs circles around my old 6.0 but it was also a 4 speed too.  But those things were pretty much indestructible.  I wouldn’t want to pull max GCWR all the time but it could do it.  I’d still prefer my diesel for the heavy loads but it’s reassuring the gas can get the job done if needed.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Doodle said:

Yeah this 6.6 runs circles around my old 6.0 but it was also a 4 speed too.  But those things were pretty much indestructible.  I wouldn’t want to pull max GCWR all the time but it could do it.  I’d still prefer my diesel for the heavy loads but it’s reassuring the gas can get the job done if needed.  

Great info.  I've got the gasser too and love it.  It's so easy to live with.  Just fire it up and go.  Strap on a heavy ass trailer or camper and off you go...thank you so much for this post.  I do love the diesels, don't get me wrong, I would love to have all that torque in waiting for my right foot to push down on the go pedal.....but this gasser is really something special....LOVE IT!!!

  • Like 2
Posted

I ordered a 24 gas AT4 yesterday. We built it today at my dealer and it'll get submitted on the 19th. 

 

I had a 21 L5P and it was nothing but check engine lights and I traded it on a 1500 6.2 while it was in the shop waiting on a def tank. My 2016 LML blew a HG, Coolant tank, 2 water pumps, and a DPF... I'll miss the raw power of a diesel but actually looking forward to the simplicity of the Gas truck with the 10 speed behind it.

 

I towed my 2755 Coleman travel trailer 800 miles and it was a white knuckle ride even with a WD hitch. I thought I could get away with it but it's just not safe. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/7/2023 at 6:27 PM, 20Denali22 said:

I ordered a 24 gas AT4 yesterday. We built it today at my dealer and it'll get submitted on the 19th. 

 

I had a 21 L5P and it was nothing but check engine lights and I traded it on a 1500 6.2 while it was in the shop waiting on a def tank. My 2016 LML blew a HG, Coolant tank, 2 water pumps, and a DPF... I'll miss the raw power of a diesel but actually looking forward to the simplicity of the Gas truck with the 10 speed behind it.

 

I towed my 2755 Coleman travel trailer 800 miles and it was a white knuckle ride even with a WD hitch. I thought I could get away with it but it's just not safe. 

Wow didn’t know the configurator was going yet.  My dealer told me they hadn’t seen anything yet, but I did read somewhere the order banks were supposed to open Jan 19th.  I was holding out for the refresh but when they switched to the 2024 I went ahead and bought the 23 last fall.  My plans were to probably trade it off early for a 24 if the prices are insane.  Did you ‘re dealer give yo any indication of pricing/options?  I figure my 23 used will be worth a decent amount in 2023 I would hope.  Guess we’ll see what the numbers look like and try to get some indication of when it could get built.  

Posted
On 1/8/2023 at 9:49 PM, Doodle said:

Wow didn’t know the configurator was going yet.  My dealer told me they hadn’t seen anything yet, but I did read somewhere the order banks were supposed to open Jan 19th.  I was holding out for the refresh but when they switched to the 2024 I went ahead and bought the 23 last fall.  My plans were to probably trade it off early for a 24 if the prices are insane.  Did you ‘re dealer give yo any indication of pricing/options?  I figure my 23 used will be worth a decent amount in 2023 I would hope.  Guess we’ll see what the numbers look like and try to get some indication of when it could get built.  

I told him what I wanted, he said I was good to go for the 19th. No pricing yet, just able to see the order guide and options on the dealers end right now. The configuration tool should be live any day now too

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Any update to this on pricing now that the 19th has come and gone?  Now that the 6.6 has the 10 speed, I'm about 90% sure that's my next truck.

 

@20Denali22regarding travel trailer with a half ton, there are some things you can do to make it a night and day different experience.  Half tons come with squishy P-metric tires.  Change to load range E.  Put Roadmaster Active Suspension on the rear end.  I spent the $3500 on a ProPride hitch too, which is pricey but worth every penny.  I did a 4000 mile round trip last summer towing my trailer from AZ to WI and back via some mountainous terrain and winds in the plains.  5.3L and 8 speed did shockingly well.  Super easy drive.  Only thing I'd have liked is another gear between 3 and 4 on the climbs.  If the 4k wasn't going to be an annual trip, I'd stick with half ton with the mods I mentioned.

PXL_20220129_154723641.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

While the 6.6 is rated more than capable for what I'm looking at, I also wouldn't complain if GM would develope that mystery big block that was rumored before COVID.

 

Especially not that Ford has the 6.8 and 7.3, and rumors are out there that Ram will have a 6.7L turbo gas Cummins.

Posted
16 minutes ago, nick112288 said:

While the 6.6 is rated more than capable for what I'm looking at, I also wouldn't complain if GM would develope that mystery big block that was rumored before COVID.

 

Especially not that Ford has the 6.8 and 7.3, and rumors are out there that Ram will have a 6.7L turbo gas Cummins.

The 6.6 gas already dynos right with the 7.3. So the 6.8 they are offering with the base truck, which is a dumb idea and only good for ford to boost higher trim sales, is not even close. I also read it doesn’t even have a forged crank. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Pryme said:

The 6.6 gas already dynos right with the 7.3. So the 6.8 they are offering with the base truck, which is a dumb idea and only good for ford to boost higher trim sales, is not even close. I also read it doesn’t even have a forged crank. 

I haven't read anything about the ford engine but I do know having an iron block, with 6 bolt mains, with a forged crank and forged rods is nothing but the best bottom end ever!!  That 6.6L is amazing.  I'm hoping GM ups it to 450hp and say around 510 torque.  That is well within what the 6L90E can handle and makes more sense using more of what the actual capabilities of that engine and drivetrain.  The 11.5" rear end will love it too.  I'm curious as to why they derated it so much, and all I can come up with is fuel mileage.  Because hyping it up making more hp and tq, will have no negative effect on the overall drivetrain.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I am hoping that GM finally does something about the weak torque converters they are using. I cant imagine a billet unit being all that much more expensive. If it was a lone problem, that would be one thing but a TC failure wipes out the rest of the trans. If I keep my 2021 past the 3/36 warranty I will likely bite the pillow and have a billet TC put in it. 

Of course this is the same company that cheaps out on tapping a 1/2" pipe plug hole into the bottom of the rear diff so a job that could take 15 minutes turns into an hour. 

Edited by 64BAwagon
  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...