Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

We're about 3200 miles into a 4000 mile round trip from Arizona to WI and back via Colorado.  I did this trip last year in my 2016 Denali half ton with the 5.3L and 8 speed for comparison.

 

I'd say the Allison and 6.6 gas combo is "just OK."  It REALLY loves to drop down into 6th gear and rev to about 3250-3500 RPM on almost any hill, and it struggles to stay in 8th gear on the flats if the headwinds are over 7 MPH.  Granted, I tow pretty fast around 70-72 MPH.  But I expected more out of the big gasser.  I know it's not a diesel, but I figured it'd race up the grades my old 5.3L did at 4500 RPM down around 3000 RPM or so.  Climbing the Mogollon Rim in AZ, this was not the case.  Maybe closer to 4500 RPM vs 4000 RPM.  Maybe I just had a really strong 5.3! :)

 

The chassis is great, and so is the tech.  The truck is certainly more composed than the half ton was handling-wise, and I barely run any weight distribution at all, which improves the ride.  It gets about 1 MPG better than the Denali did towing, but it's an absolute thirsty pig not towing.

 

I'm still happy with the decision.  I don't mind the sound of a V8 doing work, and the transmission stays cool even in AZ.  Just expected a bit more jam.  Feels like GM left a ton on the table with this engine.

Edited by UWSkier
Posted
13 hours ago, UWSkier said:

We're about 3200 miles into a 4000 mile round trip from Arizona to WI and back via Colorado.  I did this trip last year in my 2016 Denali half ton with the 5.3L and 8 speed for comparison.

 

I'd say the Allison and 6.6 gas combo is "just OK."  It REALLY loves to drop down into 6th gear and rev to about 3250-3500 RPM on almost any hill, and it struggles to stay in 8th gear on the flats if the headwinds are over 7 MPH.  Granted, I tow pretty fast around 70-72 MPH.  But I expected more out of the big gasser.  I know it's not a diesel, but I figured it'd race up the grades my old 5.3L did at 4500 RPM down around 3000 RPM or so.  Climbing the Mogollon Rim in AZ, this was not the case.  Maybe closer to 4500 RPM vs 4000 RPM.  Maybe I just had a really strong 5.3! :)

 

The chassis is great, and so is the tech.  The truck is certainly more composed than the half ton was handling-wise, and I barely run any weight distribution at all, which improves the ride.  It gets about 1 MPG better than the Denali did towing, but it's an absolute thirsty pig not towing.

 

I'm still happy with the decision.  I don't mind the sound of a V8 doing work, and the transmission stays cool even in AZ.  Just expected a bit more jam.  Feels like GM left a ton on the table with this engine.

I’ve read a lot of lackluster reviews on the new combo and have seen an alarming number of issues with the 24. It’s not really a “new” model so not sure why it would be having so many growing pains?

 

lots of comments stating things like “my 20-23 was great or plenty good “ etc. 

 

 

Posted

Just curious, what gear ratio is your truck? 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Pryme said:

I’ve read a lot of lackluster reviews on the new combo and have seen an alarming number of issues with the 24. It’s not really a “new” model so not sure why it would be having so many growing pains?

 

lots of comments stating things like “my 20-23 was great or plenty good “ etc. 

 

 

All new electrical architecture on several components.


I have the trailer brake/solar issue, which annoys me greatly, but everything else electronically has been OK so far.  I did have one instance where my driver's side blindspot monitor was seeing ghosts, but that resolved on its own on the next time out.

 

Things I thought I'd like but am somewhat disappointed in:

  • Trailering electronics: I needed to buy a stupid pigtail for the 7 way so my cameras would work because GM can't just supply a steady 12v to the lights for some dumb reason.
  • Engine power: I guess it's a punched out 6.2 basically, and that engine likes to rev too, so I shouldn't be surprised by the weak low RPM power.  I had about a 12 MPH crossing headwind in the grassy plains of NE Colorado today and it wouldn't shift past 7th gear and would drop to 6th and rev about 3250 RPM at the slightest incline running 68-70 MPH.
  • Transmission gear spacing.  It goes from 8th to 6th far too often when towing.  I don't need 5 gears below 6th but I would love another one between 6th and 8th.
  • Adaptive cruise for towing: I thought I'd like this, but it's really not very useful at all.  You'll be tooling along at 70 MPH or so with your cruise on and someone will pass you, then do the right thing and get out of the passing lane, but if they are only going 3-5 MPH faster than you, when they pull in front of you, the cruise hits the brakes.  This always seems to happen at the bottom of a hill you're about to climb.  After using it for about a thousand miles on the way east last month, I disabled it and am using regular cruise.
  • Touch screen lag and sensitivity when using Android Auto.  Seems like you need to long press each location to get a response when trying to play a text or play/pause music.

Things I really like:

  • The cameras.  I don't use the transparent trailer since I already have a Haloview with a mirror-mounted display, but the built-in cameras are awesome.  The trailer blind spot camera has come in handy dozens of times.  Flip on the indicator, look at the blind spot cam, then the haloview cam.  If it's the same vehicle in both, clear to move over.  The hitch cam is excellent for hooking up.
  • Wireless Android Auto.  Nice to not have a cable.
  • Wireless charging.  I had this on my old truck but the pad was too small for modern phones.
  • The handling when towing.  I did all the mods I could to make the half ton tow well, but this tows better.
  • Rubber floor liners.  I have a Golden Retriever.  'nuff said.
  • The power tailgate. I dig being able to push a button and walk away, or use the keyfob to raise or lower.  The DW loves this feature too.
  • Like 1
Posted

The 6.6 is not a diesel, and it's not a turbo. It actually puts out less power than the 6.2 does, and its in a much bigger and heavier truck. It's absolutely going to rev high when its working, just like every other N/A gasser in existence.

 

If you just wanted more towing power than your old 5.3, the 6.2 or 3.0 diesel would be the natural upgrade.

 

But as you noted, the 2500 platform itself is really a whole different truck, and the 6.6 is a cast iron block with much stronger internals, it will take a bigger beating every day without any issue. The 5.3 and 6.2 are aluminum blocks, not really meant for daily abuse.

 

If you want to compare apples to apples, check out "automotiv inc" on YT where he puts the 6.6 vs the Ford 7.3, you'll see they both rev very high when working hard, and the 6.6 actually goes up the eisenhower quicker though the Ford was running with damaged lifters/cam so there's that.

Posted
9 hours ago, UWSkier said:

All new electrical architecture on several components.


I have the trailer brake/solar issue, which annoys me greatly, but everything else electronically has been OK so far.  I did have one instance where my driver's side blindspot monitor was seeing ghosts, but that resolved on its own on the next time out.

 

Things I thought I'd like but am somewhat disappointed in:

  • Trailering electronics: I needed to buy a stupid pigtail for the 7 way so my cameras would work because GM can't just supply a steady 12v to the lights for some dumb reason.
  • Engine power: I guess it's a punched out 6.2 basically, and that engine likes to rev too, so I shouldn't be surprised by the weak low RPM power.  I had about a 12 MPH crossing headwind in the grassy plains of NE Colorado today and it wouldn't shift past 7th gear and would drop to 6th and rev about 3250 RPM at the slightest incline running 68-70 MPH.
  • Transmission gear spacing.  It goes from 8th to 6th far too often when towing.  I don't need 5 gears below 6th but I would love another one between 6th and 8th.
  • Adaptive cruise for towing: I thought I'd like this, but it's really not very useful at all.  You'll be tooling along at 70 MPH or so with your cruise on and someone will pass you, then do the right thing and get out of the passing lane, but if they are only going 3-5 MPH faster than you, when they pull in front of you, the cruise hits the brakes.  This always seems to happen at the bottom of a hill you're about to climb.  After using it for about a thousand miles on the way east last month, I disabled it and am using regular cruise.
  • Touch screen lag and sensitivity when using Android Auto.  Seems like you need to long press each location to get a response when trying to play a text or play/pause music.

Things I really like:

  • The cameras.  I don't use the transparent trailer since I already have a Haloview with a mirror-mounted display, but the built-in cameras are awesome.  The trailer blind spot camera has come in handy dozens of times.  Flip on the indicator, look at the blind spot cam, then the haloview cam.  If it's the same vehicle in both, clear to move over.  The hitch cam is excellent for hooking up.
  • Wireless Android Auto.  Nice to not have a cable.
  • Wireless charging.  I had this on my old truck but the pad was too small for modern phones.
  • The handling when towing.  I did all the mods I could to make the half ton tow well, but this tows better.
  • Rubber floor liners.  I have a Golden Retriever.  'nuff said.
  • The power tailgate. I dig being able to push a button and walk away, or use the keyfob to raise or lower.  The DW loves this feature too.

Nice write up. The adaptive cruise scenario is exactly why I don’t use it in my daily driver. It’s so annoying. A car slides back in front of you and your car hits the brakes. Also if someone you’re coming up on is going ever so slightly slower, your vehicle will slow slightly and before you know it you’re going 4-5 under the limit ha. 
 

why does the truck skip 7th? You said you would like something between 6-8. 

Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, the wanderer said:

The 6.6 is not a diesel, and it's not a turbo. It actually puts out less power than the 6.2 does, and its in a much bigger and heavier truck. It's absolutely going to rev high when its working, just like every other N/A gasser in existence.

 

If you just wanted more towing power than your old 5.3, the 6.2 or 3.0 diesel would be the natural upgrade.

 

But as you noted, the 2500 platform itself is really a whole different truck, and the 6.6 is a cast iron block with much stronger internals, it will take a bigger beating every day without any issue. The 5.3 and 6.2 are aluminum blocks, not really meant for daily abuse.

 

If you want to compare apples to apples, check out "automotiv inc" on YT where he puts the 6.6 vs the Ford 7.3, you'll see they both rev very high when working hard, and the 6.6 actually goes up the eisenhower quicker though the Ford was running with damaged lifters/cam so there's that.

True, but my priority when shopping was to get something with excessive payload and increased safety margin when towing in the mountains and needing to stop, swerve, etc.  The HD blows away the half tons in that regard.  And that's why I'm happy with the truck overall.  It meets the primary objective in spades.

 

35 minutes ago, Pryme said:

Nice write up. The adaptive cruise scenario is exactly why I don’t use it in my daily driver. It’s so annoying. A car slides back in front of you and your car hits the brakes. Also if someone you’re coming up on is going ever so slightly slower, your vehicle will slow slightly and before you know it you’re going 4-5 under the limit ha. 
 

why does the truck skip 7th? You said you would like something between 6-8. 

Running roughly 70 MPH, 8th gear is around 2250 RPM.  7th is just around 2600 RPM.  6th is 3250 RPM.  Just my seat of the pants feel, but it feels like the engine would be happy around 2900-3000 RPM for the times it drops to 6th.  The reason I say that is if you are using cruise, on an incline, you lose MPH in 8th, and in 7th, but it accelerates right back up to set speed in 6th.

Edited by UWSkier
Posted
8 minutes ago, UWSkier said:

True, but my priority when shopping was to get something with excessive payload and increased safety margin when towing in the mountains and needing to stop, swerve, etc.  The HD blows away the half tons in that regard.  And that's why I'm happy with the truck overall.  It meets the primary objective in spades.

 

Running roughly 70 MPH, 8th gear is around 2250 RPM.  7th is just around 2600 RPM.  6th is 3250 RPM.  Just my seat of the pants feel, but it feels like the engine would be happy around 2900-3000 RPM for the times it drops to 6th.  The reason I say that is if you are using cruise, on an incline, you lose MPH in 8th, and in 7th, but it accelerates right back up to set speed in 6th.

Will it not cruise in 9-10 unloaded? I find it odd they didn’t do more with 4 extra gears when top gear rpm is concerned. You would think it would loaf around 1,550-1,600 rpm at 70 but I’ve seen that’s not the case. 

Posted
1 hour ago, UWSkier said:

Running roughly 70 MPH, 8th gear is around 2250 RPM.  7th is just around 2600 RPM.  6th is 3250 RPM.  Just my seat of the pants feel, but it feels like the engine would be happy around 2900-3000 RPM for the times it drops to 6th.  The reason I say that is if you are using cruise, on an incline, you lose MPH in 8th, and in 7th, but it accelerates right back up to set speed in 6th.

 

NA gas motors are always going to fall into the class of 'managed expectations". When towing at a set speed torque, not horsepower, is doing the work. When it slows down it does not have enough torque to hold that request so it increases its mechanical advantage by a gear change, multiplying the torque, and will do so until there is enough axle torque to manage that speed with a bit of excess to spare. 

 

Could it do this with more throttle in a hgher gear? Perhaps. But that method relies on increased cylinder pressure (load) which has its own problems when reliability and fuel economy are a concern and they both are. That motor is less stressed at 3,000 rpm at partial throttle that it is at 2,200 at WOT. 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Pryme said:

Will it not cruise in 9-10 unloaded? I find it odd they didn’t do more with 4 extra gears when top gear rpm is concerned. You would think it would loaf around 1,550-1,600 rpm at 70 but I’ve seen that’s not the case. 

unloaded it'll cruise in 9-10 no problem.  It'll cruise at 75 MPH towing my ski boat in 9 no problem.  The travel trailer has the aerodynamics of a container ship is the problem...

Posted (edited)
On 8/9/2023 at 7:02 PM, UWSkier said:

We're about 3200 miles into a 4000 mile round trip from Arizona to WI and back via Colorado.  I did this trip last year in my 2016 Denali half ton with the 5.3L and 8 speed for comparison.

 

I'd say the Allison and 6.6 gas combo is "just OK."  It REALLY loves to drop down into 6th gear and rev to about 3250-3500 RPM on almost any hill, and it struggles to stay in 8th gear on the flats if the headwinds are over 7 MPH.  Granted, I tow pretty fast around 70-72 MPH.  But I expected more out of the big gasser. 

 

 

Sounds like its working as intended.  The 6 speed HDs would spin way more RPM in your scenario most likely.  

 

6.6 Diesel is the only step up here if towing fast is a goal.  

 

Also also.  1/2 ton ~ 5500lbs, HD crew cab gas ~ 7000lbs.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

Back home having towed around 4600 miles with the new 6.6L/Allison combo.

 

The comments I've made so far still hold true.  I expected a bit more power in the hills, but the biggest learning of the last 1000 miles or so is that the cruise control on the 2024 is not well suited to towing with this engine/transmission combo.  It absolutely abuses the drivetrain.  Driving through CO, NM, and AZ, I started driving manually in the big hills and it worked much better with less screaming high RPM.

Posted

Great comments and feedback.  I have not towed with my 24 much yet, but I actually do like the transmission compared to the 23 6 speed I traded in.  In my opinion the two transmissions are totally opposite.  The Allison gets a heavy load moving easier, but seems to get real busy once up to cruising speed.   The 6 speed was doggy to me getting started but would hold power better once up to speed IMO.  With the 6 speed i generally never saw it shift much out of fifth with a load, the 10 speed will shift all the time and I really don’t know what gear it’s in.   But the Allison does perform well, it’s just a different driving experience.  The Allison is butter smooth so if you aren’t paying attention to the rpm’s you really don’t know it’s shifting much.  I would not fear pulling up to 26K in my area with the gas, its just mileage is gonna be 6-7.  I still have a 2015 LML so most of the time under heavy tows I’ll just use it but the 6.6 gas can do it.  I do feel like GM left some on the table with this engine.  I know whipple came out with a new supercharger, but it’s like $7500 so that make no sense, might as well get the diesel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...