Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi all,

 

First real issue on my 2018 Suburban 5.3L at 86k miles. On a road trip over Thanksgiving, I noticed it wasn't holding operating temps. It has always stayed dead nuts on at 210F indicated no matter what (hot/cold/towing), but on this 900 mile trip it was fluctuating between about 190 to 205F indicated. It would touch 210F and never go above that going up a long grade or if I had to get on it to pass someone, but otherwise kept fluctuating between 190-205 indicated. My thoughts. Thermostat stuck open, and will open as much as it needs to to avoid overheat, but won't close up for whatever reason resulting in a mild underheat and very slow warm-ups.

 

Took to dealership (I hate these guys), they offered to throw a temp sensor at it (???). Saw here on the forum that these can go bad too, so said okay but was wondering. Honestly, I just wanted to throw money at it and make the problem go away also, but sure enough it's doing the same exact thing today so just wasted a bunch of money for nothing. 🤬

 

Digging in now, and apparently NOBODY has the OE thermostat in stock??

 

GM GENUINE PARTS WATER PUMP OUTLET ASSEMBLY WITH THERMOSTAT
GM Part # 12674639
ACDelco Part # 15-11125

 

Not online parts sources (RockAuto, O'Reilly, NAPA, etc.), and not local dealerships either, hence offering to throw a temp sensor at it and hoping it would fix it, since they apparently didn't have any thermostats (GM Parts online says no for all area dealership, but still trying to get in touch with the parts counter guy to confirm.)

 

What gives?? Is there any place you can get the OE thermostat from these days? 

 

Summit Racing listing actually showed an estimated shipping date of MARCH 2024? What the actual f*??

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/ado-15-11125

 

Rock Auto had these MOTORAD thermostats available? Are these any good? I searched and found one thread here where someone who got the stock 207 degree t-stat reported the engine running too hot, and actually had to get the cooler one and then it was fine. No idea if that's the norm or just a fluke? What else is there? 

https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/chevrolet,2018,suburban,5.3l+v8,3438969,cooling+system,thermostat,2200

 

Also, for those of you that have scan tools, if the gauge is showing 190-205F indicated, do you know what the actual coolant temps are for that? I'm assuming the gauge stays parked at 210F across a wider range. Just wondering. Going to be putting 2-3k miles on the truck over the next month, so want to get this sorted ASAP without getting ripped off again, or having to put a flakey part in.

 

Thanks for the help! 

 

Screenshot2023-11-29234657.thumb.png.f580c9083aad74b24aba07a6b9a46728.pngScreenshot2023-11-30084803.thumb.png.fcfd4bd7e0a2e32b3b26e262f98484b6.png

Edited by K2xxSteve
Posted

UPDATE finally got through to the parts counter guy at my dealership. He confirmed the parts are "massively backordered" and that they have 8 on backorder right now, but no idea when they're coming in. FFS.

Posted

Is it really going to be like this to get parts for a 2015-2020 Suburban?  Ours is barely 3 years old and knock on wood we've not had any issues except for sluggish automatic side steps.  And we'll be making our last payment before spring of next.  But is a parts shortage just going to be part of the ownership experience?

Posted
On 12/2/2023 at 6:06 PM, CarFan1 said:

Is it really going to be like this to get parts for a 2015-2020 Suburban?  Ours is barely 3 years old and knock on wood we've not had any issues except for sluggish automatic side steps.  And we'll be making our last payment before spring of next.  But is a parts shortage just going to be part of the ownership experience?

I think it's due to the strikes, to be honest! Saw this on a parts website. I might just have to put the questionable MOTORAD in it for now.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.0320b9e34d2501673fa033f80c9b7cd2.jpeg

Posted (edited)

Additional troubleshooting steps over the weekend, and trying to 100% confirm the issue and that it wasn't something else before I dump more money into this. Got an OBD2 reader and a new laser temp gun, and monitored reported coolant temp sensor data vs. head temp (should match), thermostat inlet temp, and then thermostat outlet temp on the radiator hose in 1 minute intervals on a cold start. Saw thermostat opening way early at 160F. Not sure when the stock is supposed to open, but either way it's opening early, and staying open below where it should, thus the truck is not maintaining temperatures. Done deal it's the thermostat, which is what I had thought it was in the first place! The coolant temp sensor was probably always fine!  

 

Screenshot 2023-12-02 130445.png

Edited by K2xxSteve
Posted

Next problem has been finding where I can get a genuine GM thermostat assembly from. It appears this is a very common issue, which combined with the GM strike, has lead to widespread parts unavailability.

 

A couple days getting run around and ripped off by the dealership, and then a couple days genuinely trying to be helpful run around by a local shop asking legit questions making sure I wasn't fixing the wrong problem before I dump more money into it, and the two that had been found are gone. The local shop (good guys) had found an OEM part last Thursday but now gone, and a part my buddy had found at a parts store down in GA (I'm in MD) was also gone. F me! 

 

Sooo.... off to eBay I go. I'm not sure where and if this is the same seller or not, but I'm 99% sure I had seen a post somewhere about these being legit. Someone here had ordered one somewhere. Per the description, they're new OEM thermostats off of the water pump assemblies. After reading a lot of bad reports here about the MOTORAD's being unreliable and/or not maintaining the correct temperatures, I feel safer buying this than the MOTORAD, so will see how it goes and report back! 

 

Listing link is here. There were 6 left, now 5 after I purchased. 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/115727184809

Screenshot 2023-12-04 122404.png

Posted

This is off that listing. Has GM and correct part number stamped into the housing. I bought another one that was listed as a Genuine GM part from another seller just in case. If the first one works out and I don't end up needing the backup, will either return it or re-sell it here in the FS forum.

 

What a CF!!!!image.thumb.jpeg.d0fbdfa7028b968d03629a7c892ea3c8.jpeg

Posted
1 minute ago, Grumpy Bear said:

More Information for GM GENUINE 1511113 (rockauto.com)

 

One left when I looked. This is the 194 F GM from the Cadilac and Corvette V8. 

 

Thank you, Grumpy Bear! Have seen your posts in a bunch of the other thermostat related threads here, which were very helpful! Good lead. So I have two of the 207 F OEM on the way (15-11125), but this might be helpful to someone else reading. I wasn't sure what the OEM prices were, but figured what I was paying on eBay was about on target.

 

Just curious, but which Cadillacs do the -13 PN / 194 F rated go into?

Posted
1 hour ago, K2xxSteve said:

Just curious, but which Cadillacs do the -13 PN / 194 F rated go into?

 

2014-2017 CTS-V 6.2 Supercharged. [2016 shown]

 

image.thumb.png.0892f281c547666583d1eeb864a5be3c.png

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

So the new thermostat came in on Thursday and took it to a good local shop on Monday. Just short trips on Monday, but finally had a nice 40 minute drive today and it seems solid. Mostly stays dead-on at 207F actual in light driving and 50 degree outside temps. Forgot to take a photo of the one that came in, but it was a genuine GM part complete with GM and part number stamping, taken from a full water pump assembly as described in the eBay listing.


What a freaking hassle, but glad it's finally fixed!  

 

The guy on eBay still has plenty of these if anybody needs them. $199 is a ripoff (I paid $149) but it is what it is when you can't get them elsewhere: https://www.ebay.com/itm/115727184809

 

You can get the full water pump assembly from which he's taking those from for only $50 more from Rock Auto, and elsewhere. Just remove the thermostat if that's all you need, and sell the water pump or keep it as a spare.

https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=10622996&cc=3438969&pt=10178&jsn=492

 

40 minute drive log attached. It's working as it should so not going to do another cold start test and waste more gas.

2018 Suburban Thermostat Replacement.png

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Just to piggy back in case anyone is searching and finds this post.

2015 suburban with temp gauge not going above 170 degrees and heat blowing warm only.  Outside temp was 0 degrees.  Went to autozone and picked up a thermostat for $55, installed in less than 30 minutes and temp back at 210 degrees with heat blowing very hot.  Not OEM, but so far so good.

 

image.thumb.png.6fa637e7fc1502311bbd73099fc74c61.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...