Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2024 Silverado 3500 Crew Cab short box 4x4.

Any idea how much weight the sides of the box are rated to carry? Or where I can look to find a rating?  My searches are failing.  The dealer is clueless.

I want to add racks for carrying ladders, pipe, boards, kayaks, etc. Probably no more than 300 lbs. Racks I've read about list a weight capacity for the racks but in the fine print say not to go over the trucks capacity. Which makes sense, I just have to find the trucks capacity....

There are also different mounting options. Some use the stake pockets, some sit on top the side and have a flange that goes down and clamps to the inside bed rail, some have a rail that mounts on top the bed side and the rack mounts to the rail. Any experience with which is best? I also want to add a tonneau cover so if anybody can recommend a cover and racks that play well together I'd love to hear about them.

Posted
10 minutes ago, sno1 said:

2024 Silverado 3500 Crew Cab short box 4x4.

Any idea how much weight the sides of the box are rated to carry? Or where I can look to find a rating?  My searches are failing.  The dealer is clueless.

I want to add racks for carrying ladders, pipe, boards, kayaks, etc. Probably no more than 300 lbs. Racks I've read about list a weight capacity for the racks but in the fine print say not to go over the trucks capacity. Which makes sense, I just have to find the trucks capacity....

There are also different mounting options. Some use the stake pockets, some sit on top the side and have a flange that goes down and clamps to the inside bed rail, some have a rail that mounts on top the bed side and the rack mounts to the rail. Any experience with which is best? I also want to add a tonneau cover so if anybody can recommend a cover and racks that play well together I'd love to hear about them.

 

 

BEDDD.thumb.png.593fa9baa4f9011e3249a5559c39378f.png

Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

BEDDD.thumb.png.593fa9baa4f9011e3249a5559c39378f.png

Thank you very much for this.  Don't know how I missed it but there it is right in the owners manual....I'm an idiot

Posted
1 hour ago, sno1 said:

Thank you very much for this.  Don't know how I missed it but there it is right in the owners manual....I'm an idiot

 

 

They don't print the "full" manual like they used to so you might not have seen it in yours.  They now just print like a get to know your truck booklet.

 

Full owners manual can be found from Chevy online, in the radio or the MyChevrolet app, or can be purchased from Helm Inc.  

Posted
35 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

They don't print the "full" manual like they used to so you might not have seen it in yours.  They now just print like a get to know your truck booklet.

 

Full owners manual can be found from Chevy online, in the radio or the MyChevrolet app, or can be purchased from Helm Inc.  

I don't actually own the truck yet so I'm looking at the online manual, just failed to see it.  I saw the page # in your post so I checked and sure enough, there it is.

 

I'm trying to decide between GM and Ford🤮.  Each truck has things I like and things I don't like.  For what these things cost now I want to make sure it'll do what I want and hopefully some day I can get over the price and enjoy using it.

 

Thanks again for your assist, I do appreciate it

Posted
5 minutes ago, sno1 said:

I don't actually own the truck yet so I'm looking at the online manual, just failed to see it.  I saw the page # in your post so I checked and sure enough, there it is.

 

I'm trying to decide between GM and Ford🤮.  Each truck has things I like and things I don't like.  For what these things cost now I want to make sure it'll do what I want and hopefully some day I can get over the price and enjoy using it.

 

Thanks again for your assist, I do appreciate it

 

 

No problem.  

 

What are some of the pros/cons you are debating on for GM vs Ford for your decision?  

Posted
1 minute ago, newdude said:

 

 

No problem.  

 

What are some of the pros/cons you are debating on for GM vs Ford for your decision?  

I prefer the GM IFS over the Ford monobeam front axle.

Prefer GM bed, it's a little bigger, straighter sides, seems more "usable"

This is a generalization, but GM trucks tend to be easier to work on.  I'm just talking about the easy stuff that I can do myself; oil changes, brakes, replacing a starter, etc

The thing that I find most appealing about the Ford is driving it.  I like the seating position better, the feel of the seat, and the view out the windshield.  The GM hood is too high and seat too low.  Now this is very subjective and only applies to me.

I prefer the 7.3 in the Ford, not a fan of direct injection in GM. (gas engines)

 

I'm ready to be swayed one way or the other.........

Posted
6 minutes ago, sno1 said:

I prefer the GM IFS over the Ford monobeam front axle.

Prefer GM bed, it's a little bigger, straighter sides, seems more "usable"

This is a generalization, but GM trucks tend to be easier to work on.  I'm just talking about the easy stuff that I can do myself; oil changes, brakes, replacing a starter, etc

The thing that I find most appealing about the Ford is driving it.  I like the seating position better, the feel of the seat, and the view out the windshield.  The GM hood is too high and seat too low.  Now this is very subjective and only applies to me.

I prefer the 7.3 in the Ford, not a fan of direct injection in GM. (gas engines)

 

I'm ready to be swayed one way or the other.........

I was deciding between the F250 and 2500 and I was even in talks with a known dealership on the ford truck forum but I also preferred the ifs. It rides much better day to day and also I saw and still see many more engine problems and absolute failed on the 7.3 vs 6.6. I have yet to see more than a few oil use posts but no failures of the 6.6 (mine uses none, most don’t here) and I like the look of the Chevy. IMO the ford looks too soft with the totally round wheel wells and that sloping side window. I prefer the shape of the Chevy wells(I did not like the older ones that were totally square) and also like the normal side windows on the Chevy. 
 

Also like the Chevy still has hydro boost brakes. Ford doesn’t. 
 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Pryme said:

I was deciding between the F250 and 2500 and I was even in talks with a known dealership on the ford truck forum but I also preferred the ifs. It rides much better day to day and also I saw and still see many more engine problems and absolute failed on the 7.3 vs 6.6. I have yet to see more than a few oil use posts but no failures of the 6.6 (mine uses none, most don’t here) and I like the look of the Chevy. IMO the ford looks too soft with the totally round wheel wells and that sloping side window. I prefer the shape of the Chevy wells(I did not like the older ones that were totally square) and also like the normal side windows on the Chevy. 
 

Also like the Chevy still has hydro boost brakes. Ford doesn’t. 
 

 

Granger Ford?  I'm also on a Ford forum trying to get as much info as possible.  There are some extremely smart and helpful people on these forums.....as well as some less pleasant

 

I was nervous about the oil usage, but there are so few reports I decided not to worry about that, anything mass produced is going to have a few duds.  I am VERY concerned about Fords quality control and high number of recalls.

 

When I talk about GM I'm referring to both GMC and Chevrolet.  As far as appearance I like the GMC but of course that's just personal opinion and we all like different things.  Appearance isn't at the top of my priority list, I put function first.  If the best functioning is also the best looking then that's a win-win.

 

I've only driven one Chevy and one Ford, and they were a couple weeks apart, but I really preferred driving the Ford.  I need to make time to go drive a couple more on the same day....

 

Good point about the brakes

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, sno1 said:

Granger Ford?  I'm also on a Ford forum trying to get as much info as possible.  There are some extremely smart and helpful people on these forums.....as well as some less pleasant

 

I was nervous about the oil usage, but there are so few reports I decided not to worry about that, anything mass produced is going to have a few duds.  I am VERY concerned about Fords quality control and high number of recalls.

 

When I talk about GM I'm referring to both GMC and Chevrolet.  As far as appearance I like the GMC but of course that's just personal opinion and we all like different things.  Appearance isn't at the top of my priority list, I put function first.  If the best functioning is also the best looking then that's a win-win.

 

I've only driven one Chevy and one Ford, and they were a couple weeks apart, but I really preferred driving the Ford.  I need to make time to go drive a couple more on the same day....

 

Good point about the brakes

Yes granger. I still peek at the ford truck forum but there is so much bickering and blabbing on there I rarely do anymore. This forum is more adult imo. 
 

another thing I remember reading is a very high amount of leaking truck threads over there, as in water leaking into the cab. Sounds terrible. I’m very happy with my truck choice though. 

Edited by Pryme
Posted
1 minute ago, Pryme said:

Yes granger. I still peek at the ford truck forum but there is so much bickering and blabbing on there I rarely do anymore. This forum is more adult imo. 
 

another thing I remember reading is a very high amount of leaking truck threads over there, as in water leaking into the cab. Sounds terrible. I’m very happy with my truck choice though. 

Some of the bickering is like a bunch of 6 year olds, makes it hard to follow some of the threads, much prefer this forum.  Another plus for GM

 

Very glad to hear you're happy with your truck!  Hope I will be just as happy one of these days.....

Did I mention I'm having a hard time adjusting to current prices?

 

I think I may have messed up with my original post.  Wondering if I should re-post the second portion asking for advice on racks in the mods portion of this forum?

Posted

 Just to jump in here, I’m a Chevy truck guy but…..

I spend a lot of time underneath my truck. I will spend an inordinate amount of time and money directed toward the transmission. I did the same with my 2018.

I bought this truck to tow my boat and travel trailer. So far, so good but…..

I only have 4500 miles on it. Still, it rides better than  my 2003 Duramax. The engine appears to be built (6.6l gas) for towing rather than speed and that’s what I wanted. Slow but reliable. 

Good luck with your search!

Posted
1 hour ago, Capt Bob said:

 Just to jump in here, I’m a Chevy truck guy but…..

I spend a lot of time underneath my truck. I will spend an inordinate amount of time and money directed toward the transmission. I did the same with my 2018.

I bought this truck to tow my boat and travel trailer. So far, so good but…..

I only have 4500 miles on it. Still, it rides better than  my 2003 Duramax. The engine appears to be built (6.6l gas) for towing rather than speed and that’s what I wanted. Slow but reliable. 

Good luck with your search!

Reliable is my #1 concern. 

What are you doing to your transmission?  The trans is another concern I have about the Ford, they use a plastic pan that I am not fond of.

Posted
45 minutes ago, sno1 said:

Reliable is my #1 concern. 

What are you doing to your transmission?  The trans is another concern I have about the Ford, they use a plastic pan that I am not fond of.

The ford also went to non serviceable everything that I’m aware of. They have one time use no zerks

Posted
14 minutes ago, Pryme said:

The ford also went to non serviceable everything that I’m aware of. They have one time use no zerks

Good point.  I believe GM still does?  I looked under the Ford I test drove and didn't see a single zerk.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sad thing is that this doesn't have to be the case. LSPI can be solved without a reduction in TBN. Swap Ca for Mg.  Cats are not a issue if the OEM can get a ring and valve guide seal even at SN levels of SAPS. Dizzy is purring like a kitten with a bowl of warm milk. 200K of Full SAPS oil and zero detonation issues and nice a clean inside and out. This shouldn't be an issue. It isn't 1920.    Tell ya what AMSOIL SS is excellent at, internal cleanliness. The new formula is even a step up from their already outstanding cleanliness levels. Can't say the OEM offering is quite that clean. There marketing suggest the SS is cleaner.     That is the only defense with at shelf oil. Nothing wrong with them if you ignore the marketing and OEM 'recommended' OCI and use a thimble full of common sense. 😉 You go sir. 
    • I started with a folding cover by BAK PAC on my 2500. It went bad after close to 5 years. Bent and vinyl coming loose. Contacted BAK and they gave me a very good discount on a Revolver. Had it a number of years. Mostly outdoor storage. Some garage storage. Vinyl started to come loose. Still under warranty so they replaced to cover. Sold the 2500, bought the 1500 and got another revolver for it. Had it a couple years now and no issues. I store it indoors. Got a bit of discount when buying it as well. If you are seeing problems, contact BAK or real truck and let them know. Customer service was pretty good. But I think they changed their warranty.
    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
    • Its possible you never had the joy of the crappy boat launches we tend to have around here or really some of them are just grades down to the river if its a river scenario and the conditions change all the time with the river levels and silt deposits. Some of the lakes we went to years ago, there was no such thing as a cement pad that went down into the water that the trailer stayed on, it was gravel maybe up to the water line and then duck crap much beyond that so sinking the boat tires into mud. Of course some of the more established lakes had a cement bar type boat ramp but sometimes it was covered in green slime closer and certainly within the water and a two wheel drive had all sorts of fun if one had to touch that slime with the rear tires.    A neighbor of mine had made a comment years back with his chev truck that was probably about the same year as yours but a half ton extended cab 4x4 and he a a fiberglass boat with an inboard so it wasn't a feather weight and he had gone out to one of the large popular lakes in the area and don't ask me how this happened but he was in two wheel drive as he figured he didn't require four wheel drive for that boat ramp and somehow upon pulling the boat out he twisted one of his drive axles. I suspect it must have spun and then grabbed on the cement ramp and shocked it to the degree of twisting it. He would have had the standard 8.5 or whatever it was axle housing as the 9.5 ring gear like my truck has also has larger drive axles as far as I know. Anyway he was feeling a vibration driving home and had it checked out and a shop found that the tire/hub was wobbling because of the axle had twisted so in went a new drive axle. After that bad experience he said he made sure to put it into four wheel drive to lower the stress on the rear axle. Of course that is where an HD truck can handle a lot more stress and no doubt these newer half tons with their larger ring gears probably have larger drive axles as well to match vs back in the day. 
    • Desirable - as in does someone WANT one, aspire to have one. Could reasonably buy any car they want and CHOOSE these instead.    I didn't watch the video, why did they win?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...