Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My dealership submitted my order for a 2025 Sierra 2500-Gas Engine, Fifth Wheel package, Value package, convenience package, and running boards in early March. They advised the order still hasn't been accepted. The GM called the factory and is getting no response. He escalated it to the District Manager, and he hasn't received a response either.

 

Has anyone else had this problem recently? Is there any way to contact someone who can give me an answer? Any suggestions or similar experiences?

 

TY,

 

MJC

 

Posted

that type of truck was being built in oshawa ontario, which has a big problem of parts 

shortage due to tarriffs. it might be why they won't accept the build

Posted (edited)

Your dealer DOES NOT have an allocation or the order would be picked up.   The factory is not going to take a call from the dealer. They have no interaction with dealers, their orders come from GM.

 

They might be BS'ing in hopes you will not walk out and go find another dealer with allocations.  

 

GM dealer allocations determine how many vehicles a dealer can order from the factory each month. This system is based on the dealer's previous sales performance and their ability to sell vehicles quickly. Larger dealerships that sell more vehicles tend to receive larger allocations, while smaller dealerships receive fewer allocations. The allocation process helps GM manage production and ensure that vehicles are distributed efficiently across its dealer network.

Allocation System:

    GM assigns allocations to dealers based on factors like their previous sales figures, inventory turnover, and market demand.

    Impact on Dealers:

    If a dealer doesn't have an allocation for a specific vehicle, they cannot order it that month, regardless of how much demand they have.

    Customer Experience:

    This system can sometimes create confusion for customers, who might want to order a specific vehicle but find that their dealer cannot fulfill it due to lack of allocation.

    Dealer Inventory Management:

    Allocations help dealers manage their inventory and avoid overstocking or shortages of certain vehicles.

    Production Scheduling:

    GM uses the allocation data to schedule production and ensure that vehicles are built and shipped according to demand.

 

Edited by Z45
  • Like 2
Posted

your dealer does not have an allocation to build that unit, which is why it wasn't accepted. Your dealer is now stringing you along....

Posted
7 hours ago, ktl5005 said:

your dealer does not have an allocation to build that unit, which is why it wasn't accepted. Your dealer is now stringing you along....

Try a different dealer. I only use dealers to get the best price.

Posted (edited)

Additional replies look to be futile. Seems like the OP is another one hit wonder. He hasn't been back since he made the post. 

Edited by Jus Cruisin

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...