Jump to content

Ole Reliable

Grumpy Bear

By Grumpy Bear
in The Off-Topic Bar

 Share

Recommended Posts

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Atlas said:

 

A lot of people think that... But the Chevy SS / Pontiac G8 are not the same car as the Caprice pictured above. The Caprice was bigger. Also from our old Holden friends down in Australia.

 

I do like the SS / G8 though. Can't believe what they're still selling for, it's crazy.

 

 

Same platform, just longer wheelbase.  Both are the GM Zeta platform.  SS, G8 and Commodore VE and VF are SWB Zeta, Caprice (Holden and Chevrolet) and Buick Park Avenue were LWB Zeta. 

 

5th Generation Camaro was Zeta as well, and the only one actually produced in North America and was somewhat specific to Camaro.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

PunchT37
PunchT37

I’m really not too afraid of this thing either. 1971 Pontiac LeMans I bought in 1985. It WILL drink gas though as it’s around 630 hp and 610 tq with a 3 speed trans.     

OnTheReel
OnTheReel

What about owning multiples of the same vehicle & generation? Had FOUR 1986-1992 Toronados. This 92 was the last one I owned and the only one that I have a picture of since they pre-date the digit

newdude
newdude

Same platform, just longer wheelbase.  Both are the GM Zeta platform.  SS, G8 and Commodore VE and VF are SWB Zeta, Caprice (Holden and Chevrolet) and Buick Park Avenue were LWB Zeta.    5th

Posted Images

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Modern Camaros are my obsession...even I don't understand it! I've had too many to list. I love them all, the LT1's LS1's, V6's, the manuals, the automatics.... I'm also a huge third-gen fan too. I've always got my eyes peeled for low-mileage IROC-Z's.

I don’t care for them with the V6. Had a 95 Firebird 3.8 and 5 speed. Cheap impulse buy. Maybe kept it 3 months, it just didn’t speak to me. Too practical maybe.

 

I probably have the rose colored glasses on today because at the time even the 96 SS wasn’t really fast enough to scratch my itch. So yeah, the V6 version shouldn’t have ever been in my driveway.

3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Rear drive big cars were my favorite. Especially from GM. 

Before my time to own one but my dad’s schtick was to buy full size GM cars with the junk diesel motors for peanuts and swap gassers into them. Did it with an early 80s LeSabre and an Olds 98. I remember them being very comfortable rides for sure.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

I don’t care for them with the V6. Had a 95 Firebird 3.8 and 5 speed. Cheap impulse buy. Maybe kept it 3 months, it just didn’t speak to me. Too practical maybe.

 

I probably have the rose colored glasses on today because at the time even the 96 SS wasn’t really fast enough to scratch my itch. So yeah, the V6 version shouldn’t have ever been in my driveway.

Before my time to own one but my dad’s schtick was to buy full size GM cars with the junk diesel motors for peanuts and swap gassers into them. Did it with an early 80s LeSabre and an Olds 98. I remember them being very comfortable rides for sure.

We had 4 of those, nightmare. Two of them were converted. My thing was lmpalas. I had a few up to the 94. I went extreme on a 74 Impala custom. A 454, 700r4 transmission with a 373. It was my wife’s daily driver until she started working. Then my toy for a while. 14.2 in the quarter mile. Not bad for the 80s The I put the engine in a 76 Nova. Put the Impala back stock. I picked up a second with the Nova. 

Edited by KARNUT
  • Like 2
txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted

Ahh the A6 AC compressor. Rock solid and they lasted well, in my experience. Still running one in my 45 year old 1/2 ton. Front seal is easy to replace. Still all R-12. I can hang meat in the cab.

 

I think I had a neighbor down the street that drove a Tempest

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

My 92 Chevy truck had the original compressor when I sold it 5 years ago. Just before I sold it I had the Freon converted. He had R-12 it was costly. The conversion was easy and worked well.

Atlas Senior Enthusiast

Atlas

Posted
Posted

I was aware of the Tempest but not the Trophy 4-cylinder (195 cubic inches/almost 3.2 liters!) or rear transmission.

 

Most of my experience with GM AC compressors are the R4's of the 80's and early 90's. WIth a good R12 charge they will freeze you out. Still very good with a proper 134a conversion (including the orifice tube). However, the newer compressors running 1234yf are no joke..

 

I've been considering adding a classic bordering antique to my collection. Collectors might consider my interest trite, but I think I'd like an earlier Advanced Design pickup 3100 or 3600. They're still fairly affordable if one intends to drive it occaisonally, say a few hundred to thousand miles per year, and parts are not yet impossible to find. I like the simplicity, 216 or 235 engine.

 

Speaking of "reliable" I recently learned about the 2025-2026 LZ0 "crankshaft end play" issues. Great. What I (still) hope to be a reliable engine in my new pickup is apparently plagued by catastrophic failure in some instances, under 10k miles. I was planning on taking it to Thanksgiving this year (about 1,000 mile trip), but now I'm thinking twice and maybe we'll take something else - hard to believe an EV is the next logical choice but here we are!

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • newdude
      Magnetic ride struts

      By newdude · Posted

      Got part #s of what you ordered vs what you got?  
    • Tommy 1960
      Magnetic ride struts

      By Tommy 1960 · Posted

    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      Well if you insist.
    • diyer2
      OCI, not when but why?

      By diyer2 · Posted

      You have to have the last word. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am sure that was quite the pass experience and not a great place to experience during the winter when the conditions are not good. I've seen video of that pass and also more detailed information and pictures about the wrecks at that one hair pin turn where tractor trailers have flown right off the cliff and I am sure from all the warning signs that you know the exact curve that was !. After all there is a reason why a song was made about Wolf Creek Pass !. By the way and I didn't realize this either when I bought my truck as its nothing I even thought of that would be programmed into the cruise control and this occurs in either the basic or the more advanced cruise that controls your distance behind a vehicle and that is the brakes going down a hill are being applied as soon as the vehicle goes a certain speed over the set cruise speed. While it certainly does force downshifts in the transmission as you found out with cruise on while going down hill, its also dragging the brakes as needed to keep the speed controlled to what the cruise was set to. For me, I find that unsettling simply because I have no concept then as to how MUCH brake input is being used a and just how hot are those brakes getting and the wear factor as well. I can see that system getting a person into trouble on long mountain grades while pulling a trailer as it would not only be standing on the brakes of the pickup without any driver input, it would also be automatically applying the trailer brakes and it could cause a run away unit by overheating the brakes. Its one thing on a shorter hill and if the driver allows it to do its thing but on a long mountain grade is where things could get so out of hand. As someone a while back on this forum said, they had someone following them at night I believe on a down grade and had the cruise set and the person behind them could see the brake lights being energized all the way down the hill. I figured when I saw your comment that you didn't know and would have no way of knowing that your truck was applying the brakes and that you would and rightfully so assume you only used the brakes when you pressed on the pedal to slow down more than the cruise set speed for the slower sharp curves. So its good knowledge to know this about the newer GM trucks, certainly when doing any descending on long mountain grades. In the future try kicking off the cruise and use the the manual mode on a pass to see what that is like as I know myself when I first experienced it I thought no way can this engine be holding me back this well and tried the same hill in manual mode and sure enough the engine was revving way up and still could not hold the trucks speed down like it could in cruise mode.    Fuel mileage, that is where a really low sleek type of car can do better at higher speeds, certainly it starts sucking fuel too but a tall pickup is pushing massive amounts of air and also allowing a lot more air under it and the tow mirrors as in elephant ears pushing through the wind  as well. Driving like grandpa is about as good as one can do when driving one of these if trying to get the best fuel economy they can. I bet these trucks would get the best mileage they can if driven on a freeway in Florida if not busy traffic at a sedate speed and that sea level elevation without hills, vastly different then Colorado !. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...