Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Atlas said:

 

A lot of people think that... But the Chevy SS / Pontiac G8 are not the same car as the Caprice pictured above. The Caprice was bigger. Also from our old Holden friends down in Australia.

 

I do like the SS / G8 though. Can't believe what they're still selling for, it's crazy.

 

 

Same platform, just longer wheelbase.  Both are the GM Zeta platform.  SS, G8 and Commodore VE and VF are SWB Zeta, Caprice (Holden and Chevrolet) and Buick Park Avenue were LWB Zeta. 

 

5th Generation Camaro was Zeta as well, and the only one actually produced in North America and was somewhat specific to Camaro.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Modern Camaros are my obsession...even I don't understand it! I've had too many to list. I love them all, the LT1's LS1's, V6's, the manuals, the automatics.... I'm also a huge third-gen fan too. I've always got my eyes peeled for low-mileage IROC-Z's.

I don’t care for them with the V6. Had a 95 Firebird 3.8 and 5 speed. Cheap impulse buy. Maybe kept it 3 months, it just didn’t speak to me. Too practical maybe.

 

I probably have the rose colored glasses on today because at the time even the 96 SS wasn’t really fast enough to scratch my itch. So yeah, the V6 version shouldn’t have ever been in my driveway.

3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Rear drive big cars were my favorite. Especially from GM. 

Before my time to own one but my dad’s schtick was to buy full size GM cars with the junk diesel motors for peanuts and swap gassers into them. Did it with an early 80s LeSabre and an Olds 98. I remember them being very comfortable rides for sure.

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

I don’t care for them with the V6. Had a 95 Firebird 3.8 and 5 speed. Cheap impulse buy. Maybe kept it 3 months, it just didn’t speak to me. Too practical maybe.

 

I probably have the rose colored glasses on today because at the time even the 96 SS wasn’t really fast enough to scratch my itch. So yeah, the V6 version shouldn’t have ever been in my driveway.

Before my time to own one but my dad’s schtick was to buy full size GM cars with the junk diesel motors for peanuts and swap gassers into them. Did it with an early 80s LeSabre and an Olds 98. I remember them being very comfortable rides for sure.

We had 4 of those, nightmare. Two of them were converted. My thing was lmpalas. I had a few up to the 94. I went extreme on a 74 Impala custom. A 454, 700r4 transmission with a 373. It was my wife’s daily driver until she started working. Then my toy for a while. 14.2 in the quarter mile. Not bad for the 80s The I put the engine in a 76 Nova. Put the Impala back stock. I picked up a second with the Nova. 

Edited by KARNUT
  • Like 2
Posted

Ahh the A6 AC compressor. Rock solid and they lasted well, in my experience. Still running one in my 45 year old 1/2 ton. Front seal is easy to replace. Still all R-12. I can hang meat in the cab.

 

I think I had a neighbor down the street that drove a Tempest

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

My 92 Chevy truck had the original compressor when I sold it 5 years ago. Just before I sold it I had the Freon converted. He had R-12 it was costly. The conversion was easy and worked well.

Posted

I was aware of the Tempest but not the Trophy 4-cylinder (195 cubic inches/almost 3.2 liters!) or rear transmission.

 

Most of my experience with GM AC compressors are the R4's of the 80's and early 90's. WIth a good R12 charge they will freeze you out. Still very good with a proper 134a conversion (including the orifice tube). However, the newer compressors running 1234yf are no joke..

 

I've been considering adding a classic bordering antique to my collection. Collectors might consider my interest trite, but I think I'd like an earlier Advanced Design pickup 3100 or 3600. They're still fairly affordable if one intends to drive it occaisonally, say a few hundred to thousand miles per year, and parts are not yet impossible to find. I like the simplicity, 216 or 235 engine.

 

Speaking of "reliable" I recently learned about the 2025-2026 LZ0 "crankshaft end play" issues. Great. What I (still) hope to be a reliable engine in my new pickup is apparently plagued by catastrophic failure in some instances, under 10k miles. I was planning on taking it to Thanksgiving this year (about 1,000 mile trip), but now I'm thinking twice and maybe we'll take something else - hard to believe an EV is the next logical choice but here we are!

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,782
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Newest Member
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 5,019 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was around and remember that era very well, so I'm calling b/s on that statement. If they were that bad no police department or taxi company would've bought a single one ... but they were used in both services (and fire) for DECADES. They were bulletproof and proven. Even the early 21st century ones weren't too bad! The early models were legendary.   Mine is proof, but people like atlas are blinded by agenda and refuse to believe facts right before their very eyes.   Even decades after they were built, a new generation started driving them, posting all their builds and shenanigans on Grandmarq.net and Crownvic.net. The failures would show up then, since they all were deep past 100k-150k miles by that point, and younger drivers tend to be a little aggressive, especially with vehicles than can lay a one-tire fire for as long as you hold your foot in it. They've more than proven themselves over the decades.   The only thing that'll really take them out is road salt. The bodies and sheet metal were garbage. A victim of the cheapout FoMoCo and GM have been partaking in before then, and since.   Today it's the stuff that counts - the undercarriage that rots away first!    GMs Caprice was no slouch either. Reliable as a stone ax - the opposite of what they build now.    
    • Let me know how your vehicles do in 10 years. You don't know ******, kid. 😂    There's a reason that Panther platform was used as police, fire, and taxi service for DECADES ... long before you were born, apparently.
    • If your connector also has a big lever to get the connector on and off, you don't want to force the lever either way, as it becomes a bigger problem if you bust the lever or the mechanism it works.
    • It's just useful to disconnect the battery to prevent odd shorting out when unplugging/plugging stuff together.  I also  touch the two cable ends together (after disonnecting) to drain the small amount of stored battery energy in various modules.   I believe the main system where you need to be more concerned with, so you need to do the above and then wait some time, iss when you are working on the air bag system, to prevent inadvertent firing of the air bags.   The in-cab switches are just that, plain switches, it's generally not a problem to swap them in/out.  For my '12, I'll get an error message on the dash if I power up the truck w them unplugged, but that's it (power up= turn the ignition on).   The ITBC located above the spare tire is a computer that manages the trailer brake system.  That is probably more important to have the battery disconnected.  It does have to be programmed to the truck, either before or after it's installed, for it to work.  For my '12, I had a very hard time reinstalling the main connector to it (IDK if yours is the same or not), it turned out the silicon seal was jamming up, preventing it from going on all the way.  I finally got it fully installed by lubing the seal with a bit of dielectric grease, then it slid on and latched in place easily.
    • JR ! I just got the truck back from the Dealership today . The technician did a cold remote start on the truck this morning and it made the noise . It was determined that it was a starter issue and replaced it under warranty . Of course   it did not make the sound after a new starter was put in because the truck was not cold . We will we see what happens tomorrow morning when I start the truck cold  . Keep tuned !   Oh I found a video on YouTube of a cold start and it did the same thing your truck and mine do , I will see if I can find it and post it up
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...