Jump to content

PPE Transmission Pan Install

darleyhavidson
 Share

Recommended Posts

darleyhavidson Enthusiast

darleyhavidson

Posted
Posted

Installed the PPE transmission pan today when changing fluid and filter.  Pretty nice piece.  Although the gasket they supply is laughable compared to the factory gasket.  I cleaned and reused the factory gasket.  For the cost, supplying the factory gasket (or gasket of similar quality) would be prudent.  I did not replace the filter seal, mainly due being uncertain how to effectively get a tool up there without damaging machined surface.  If I wasn't laying on my back doing the installation, I may have tackled it.

 

I also purchased their thermal bypass as well and installed it.  Pretty straightforward install.  I like that is has a magnetic trap that can be periodically removed and cleaned.

 

I also installed the dipstick in the transmission as well.  Finally, a suitable setup and am very happy to be able to easily check the fluid level and condition.

Vehicle in question: 2022 GMC Sierra 2500HD with 6.6l gas

 

Picture attached to show size difference between factory and aftermarket pan.

 

20260314_081932(1).jpg

  • Like 2
bruceb58 Enthusiast

bruceb58

Posted
Posted

Why not just use

26 minutes ago, darleyhavidson said:

I also installed the dipstick in the transmission as well.  Finally, a suitable setup and am very happy to be able to easily check the fluid level and condition.

 

 

 

The level plug that the transmission pan comes with is not sufficient?

  • Haha 1
darleyhavidson Enthusiast

darleyhavidson

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 hours ago, bruceb58 said:

Why not just use

The level plug that the transmission pan comes with is not sufficient?

I suppose the level plug in the pan in sufficient.  I would rather not get the creeper out and roll under the truck each time to check fluid.  I'd rather have the capability in the engine bay when I am checking the other fluid levels/conditions.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, darleyhavidson said:

I suppose the level plug in the pan in sufficient.  I would rather not get the creeper out and roll under the truck each time to check fluid.  I'd rather have the capability in the engine bay when I am checking the other fluid levels/conditions.  

That’s just Bruce being Bruce. He’s jealous he doesn’t have a transmission dipstick. 
 

His question didn’t even require an answer. 
 

having the dipstick is nice, youre right. 

  • Like 2
topdj Enthusiast

topdj

Posted
Posted

I got both ppe bypass and pan with extra quart. So you reused pan gasket?

Temp drops a fair amount with bypass. 

darleyhavidson Enthusiast

darleyhavidson

Posted
  • Author
Posted
31 minutes ago, topdj said:

I got both ppe bypass and pan with extra quart. So you reused pan gasket?

Temp drops a fair amount with bypass. 

 

I did reuse the pan gasket.  One of the better designed parts by GM.  Same style as the rear differential gasket.  

It is hard to tell if the temp decreased, because where I live the ambient temperature has been in the single digits.  But I have noticed a 20 degree decrease in trans operating temperature based on my 45 mile highway commute.  When the weather warms up I will have a better idea.

bruceb58 Enthusiast

bruceb58

Posted
Posted
On 3/15/2026 at 6:12 AM, darleyhavidson said:

I suppose the level plug in the pan in sufficient.  I would rather not get the creeper out and roll under the truck each time to check fluid.  I'd rather have the capability in the engine bay when I am checking the other fluid levels/conditions.  

You do it once when you fill the transmission. Unless you have a leak, the ATF level will never change!

Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, bruceb58 said:

You do it once when you fill the transmission. Unless you have a leak, the ATF level will never change!

Same with the engine oil. You should remove your oil dipstick. Just don’t comment if you don’t like it Brad, I mean Bruce. 

bruceb58 Enthusiast

bruceb58

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Pryme said:

Same with the engine oil. You should remove your oil dipstick. Just don’t comment if you don’t like it Brad, I mean Bruce. 

The big difference is your engine consumes oil Dick!

 

The 10 speed uses the same style fill check as the 6 speed...works just fine. 

 

You recheck your diffs and transfer case after you fill them too?

Edited by bruceb58
Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted
On 3/19/2026 at 9:11 PM, bruceb58 said:

The big difference is your engine consumes oil Dick!

 

The 10 speed uses the same style fill check as the 6 speed...works just fine. 

 

You recheck your diffs and transfer case after you fill them too?

You know it’s obviously better to be able to check the trans fluid from up above then going under the truck. You’re just being obtuse. 
 

Maybe a guy just towed a heavy load up though the mountains and wants to see and smell his fluid. Sure a guy could go lay under the truck and go through that silly process or he could open his hood and pull the stick. Really tough choice. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
On 3/14/2026 at 11:04 PM, bruceb58 said:

Why not just use

The level plug that the transmission pan comes with is not sufficient?

 

On 3/15/2026 at 9:12 AM, darleyhavidson said:

I suppose the level plug in the pan in sufficient.  I would rather not get the creeper out and roll under the truck each time to check fluid.  I'd rather have the capability in the engine bay when I am checking the other fluid levels/conditions.  

 

 

Devil's advocate here...

 

Who says the dipstick is going to have the level correct?  GM didn't build it with one to begin with and engineered the pan to have the level set/check plug and the tube in the pan to the correct fluid level.  

 

The fact that even PPE engineered it to have a level set/check plug like the OEM plug also tells me that the plug is the most accurate measure.  

  • Like 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

 

Devil's advocate here...

 

Who says the dipstick is going to have the level correct?  GM didn't build it with one to begin with and engineered the pan to have the level set/check plug and the tube in the pan to the correct fluid level.  

 

The fact that even PPE engineered it to have a level set/check plug like the OEM plug also tells me that the plug is the most accurate measure.  

Same difference. I’ve never had a transmission leak and burn up. But after a hard pull I liked pulling the stick and take a whiff and look at the color. I’d pull the fluid out of the stick tube measure out put that amount in. Then I check the stick cold or hot on level ground. Easy peasy. I could do it wearing a suit. Now craw under the vehicle. No!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

 

Devil's advocate here...

 

Who says the dipstick is going to have the level correct?  GM didn't build it with one to begin with and engineered the pan to have the level set/check plug and the tube in the pan to the correct fluid level.  

 

The fact that even PPE engineered it to have a level set/check plug like the OEM plug also tells me that the plug is the most accurate measure.  

It’s accurate. Mine reads the proper amount unless it’s filled wrong from GM which I wouldn’t say is impossible. But it will also lend itself to easier fluid changes from up top. 
 

 

  • Haha 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Pryme said:

It’s accurate. Mine reads the proper amount unless it’s filled wrong from GM which I wouldn’t say is impossible. But it will also lend itself to easier fluid changes from up top. 
 

 

 

 

Have you compared the check plug method vs the dipstick?  As in still have the stock pan and then added the stick to verify this?  

  • Like 1
Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

Have you compared the check plug method vs the dipstick?  As in still have the stock pan and then added the stick to verify this?  

I have a 22. It has the stock pan in it still. I just added the trans the and stick. 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...